From: JNugent on
Ian Dalziel wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:49:46 +0000, JNugent
> <JN(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
>
>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> In message <ws-dnYXDL5tSMvPWnZ2dnUVZ7rVi4p2d(a)giganews.com>, Ray Keattch
>>> <r.keattch5050(a)btinternet.com> writes
>>>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I rarely 'invite' undertakers! However, if they can't resist the urge
>>>>> to undertake you, all for the sake of one or two hundred yards of
>>>>> sliproad, just let them. You'll soon catch them up - sitting
>>>>> immediately in front of you, waiting to enter the roundabout.
>>>> There is a much chance they will find a gap to use when they get to
>>>> the roundabout that you miss. If someone can pass you on the left,
>>>> you are in the wrong lane.
>>>>
>>> Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear....
>> Why the sarcasm?
>>
>> *If* there are two lanes, and if they both lead to the same place in the same
>> direction, and if you are in a right-hand lane such that someone can pass you
>> whilst using the left-hand lane, you are in the wrong lane, as the PP observed.
>>
>
> So if you're approaching a roundabout intending to turn right you
> should be in the left-hand lane? I think not.

In that case, those lanes don't "lead to the same place". I worded my post
carefully.
From: JNugent on
Ian Dalziel wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:00:44 GMT, Harry Bloomfield
> <harry.m1byt(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Ian Dalziel explained :
>>>>
>>>> *If* there are two lanes, and if they both lead to the same place in the
>>>> same
>>>> direction, and if you are in a right-hand lane such that someone can pass
>>>> you
>>>> whilst using the left-hand lane, you are in the wrong lane, as the PP
>>>> observed.
>>>>
>>> So if you're approaching a roundabout intending to turn right you
>>> should be in the left-hand lane? I think not.
>> He said BOTH lanes leading to the same direction.
>
> Both lanes approaching a roundbout lead to the roundabout.

But one is the correct lane for turning right and the other is the correct
lane for turning left.

The original "argument" was about a slip road joining a grade-separated road,
not a carriageway approaching a roundabout.
From: Ian Dalziel on
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:12:39 +0000, JNugent
<JN(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:

>Ian Dalziel wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:00:44 GMT, Harry Bloomfield
>> <harry.m1byt(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Ian Dalziel explained :
>>>>>
>>>>> *If* there are two lanes, and if they both lead to the same place in the
>>>>> same
>>>>> direction, and if you are in a right-hand lane such that someone can pass
>>>>> you
>>>>> whilst using the left-hand lane, you are in the wrong lane, as the PP
>>>>> observed.
>>>>>
>>>> So if you're approaching a roundabout intending to turn right you
>>>> should be in the left-hand lane? I think not.
>>> He said BOTH lanes leading to the same direction.
>>
>> Both lanes approaching a roundbout lead to the roundabout.
>
>But one is the correct lane for turning right and the other is the correct
>lane for turning left.
>
>The original "argument" was about a slip road joining a grade-separated road,
>not a carriageway approaching a roundabout.

"The exit slip road is two lanes as you leave it leads to a
roundabout"

From: Ian Dalziel on
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:10:42 +0000, JNugent
<JN(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:

>Ian Dalziel wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:49:46 +0000, JNugent
>> <JN(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>>> In message <ws-dnYXDL5tSMvPWnZ2dnUVZ7rVi4p2d(a)giganews.com>, Ray Keattch
>>>> <r.keattch5050(a)btinternet.com> writes
>>>>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I rarely 'invite' undertakers! However, if they can't resist the urge
>>>>>> to undertake you, all for the sake of one or two hundred yards of
>>>>>> sliproad, just let them. You'll soon catch them up - sitting
>>>>>> immediately in front of you, waiting to enter the roundabout.
>>>>> There is a much chance they will find a gap to use when they get to
>>>>> the roundabout that you miss. If someone can pass you on the left,
>>>>> you are in the wrong lane.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear....
>>> Why the sarcasm?
>>>
>>> *If* there are two lanes, and if they both lead to the same place in the same
>>> direction, and if you are in a right-hand lane such that someone can pass you
>>> whilst using the left-hand lane, you are in the wrong lane, as the PP observed.
>>>
>>
>> So if you're approaching a roundabout intending to turn right you
>> should be in the left-hand lane? I think not.
>
>In that case, those lanes don't "lead to the same place". I worded my post
>carefully.

They most certainly do, unless a roundabout can be in more than one
place at the same time. I think you should have worded it a little
more carefully.

From: JNugent on
Ian Dalziel wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:12:39 +0000, JNugent
> <JN(a)noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
>
>> Ian Dalziel wrote:
>>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:00:44 GMT, Harry Bloomfield
>>> <harry.m1byt(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ian Dalziel explained :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *If* there are two lanes, and if they both lead to the same place in the
>>>>>> same
>>>>>> direction, and if you are in a right-hand lane such that someone can pass
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> whilst using the left-hand lane, you are in the wrong lane, as the PP
>>>>>> observed.
>>>>>>
>>>>> So if you're approaching a roundabout intending to turn right you
>>>>> should be in the left-hand lane? I think not.
>>>> He said BOTH lanes leading to the same direction.
>>> Both lanes approaching a roundbout lead to the roundabout.

>> But one is the correct lane for turning right and the other is the correct
>> lane for turning left.

>> The original "argument" was about a slip road joining a grade-separated road,
>> not a carriageway approaching a roundabout.

> "The exit slip road is two lanes as you leave it leads to a
> roundabout"

OK.