From: Dingo on 25 Jul 2010 05:39 On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:27:43 +1000, "Blue Heeler" <osd351(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >Spent the weekend on the Atherton tableands and this morning I went for >a walk on part of a disused railway line. > > >Just off the pathway was this - anyone interested? > >http://img39.imageshack.us/i/p7250009k.jpg NB "Not found" - URL incorrect? >Just in case anyone in interested, here is the Yungaburra rail bridge. >Built 1958, disused 1964. I did think about walking across, there is a >convenient hole in the fence on both sides, but a look in the creek >reveals a very large amount of metal work that has fallen from the >bridge as the steel rivets rust away. > >Decided that discretion was the better part of valour today..... > > >http://a.imageshack.us/img717/7821/p7250001.jpg
From: OzOne on 25 Jul 2010 05:41 On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:27:43 +1000, "Blue Heeler" <osd351(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Just off the pathway was this - anyone interested? > >http://img39.imageshack.us/i/p7250009k.jpg What in a Yahoo search??? Nah not me I've got my own little doggy loon to toy with OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: hippo on 25 Jul 2010 09:21 Blue Heeler wrote: > > > Spent the weekend on the Atherton tableands and this morning I went for > a walk on part of a disused railway line. > > > Just off the pathway was this - anyone interested? > > http://img39.imageshack.us/i/p7250009k.jpg > > > Just in case anyone in interested, here is the Yungaburra rail bridge. > Built 1958, disused 1964. I did think about walking across, there is a > convenient hole in the fence on both sides, but a look in the creek > reveals a very large amount of metal work that has fallen from the > bridge as the steel rivets rust away. > > Decided that discretion was the better part of valour today..... > > > http://a.imageshack.us/img717/7821/p7250001.jpg > > > Got the bridge shot; 404 Not Found on the first link though. -- Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: hippo on 25 Jul 2010 19:17 Blue Heeler wrote: > > hippo wrote: > > > > > Got the bridge shot; 404 Not Found on the first link though. > > Sorry. > > > Try > > http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/9928/p7250009k.jpg > Ta - got it now. It'd definitely need new wiper blades & something doing about the headlight alignment for rego hey? -- Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: Noddy on 25 Jul 2010 22:57 "Blue Heeler" <osd351(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:xn0gx33dxjxxy000(a)news.individual.net... > http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/9928/p7250009k.jpg Looks like it needs a bucketload of work. I've seen cars in worse condition than that put back on the road, but I don't know if anyone would be willing to go to the trouble for a '54 Chev. -- Regards, Noddy.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Clarkson pits 395hp GT40 against 420hp Nobel Next: Local Electric Car Shunned by Government |