From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:32:48 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:43:27 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
> wrote:
>
>>TCM tonight featuring movies that have no sound track whatsoever.
>>
>>I think it's 10PM, one of my favorties: Fail Safe. A cold war movie taken
>>from a cold war novel, and the same book "Dr. Strangelove" was made from!
>>
>>Two different movies based on the same story.
>
>
> no sound track??????????

Er, I mean, no musical score! Ooops!

The ones with no sound track are run Sundays (Actually, Monday morning) at
midnight!

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:00:45 +0000, MasterBlaster wrote:

>
> "Ashton Crusher" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:43:27 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >TCM tonight featuring movies that have no sound track whatsoever.
>> >
>> >I think it's 10PM, one of my favorties: Fail Safe. A cold war movie taken
>> >from a cold war novel, and the same book "Dr. Strangelove" was made from!
>> >
>> >Two different movies based on the same story.
>>
>>
>> no sound track??????????
>
> Probably means (quote from a poster on IMDb).........
>
> - This is a good movie - and there is a sense of immediacy to it because there are
> - no special effects, funny lights, odd sound effects, there's no background music,
> - nothing but what goes on. It's like watching a play in your own home.

I remember when I was about 13-14 they did (I think it was CBS) "Fail Safe
Live", as it was written for the stage. Wanna talk realism?

They redid the Live version again just a few years ago (10? )



From: chuckcar on
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
wrote in news:4c50c0e0$0$74750$afc38c87(a)read01.usenet4all.se:

> TCM tonight featuring movies that have no sound track whatsoever.
>
> I think it's 10PM, one of my favorties: Fail Safe. A cold war movie
> taken from a cold war novel, and the same book "Dr. Strangelove" was
> made from!
>
> Two different movies based on the same story.
>
Are you *sure* it's the same book? The stories are quite different and
then there's this:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057012/fullcredits#writers

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058083/fullcredits#writers

"Red Alert" for Dr. Strangelove and naturally "Fail Safe" for the
other.


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: Scott Dorsey on
In article <Xns9DC78773DB14Achuck(a)127.0.0.1>, chuckcar <chuck(a)nil.car> wrote:
>=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>wrote in news:4c50c0e0$0$74750$afc38c87(a)read01.usenet4all.se:
>
>> TCM tonight featuring movies that have no sound track whatsoever.
>>
>> I think it's 10PM, one of my favorties: Fail Safe. A cold war movie
>> taken from a cold war novel, and the same book "Dr. Strangelove" was
>> made from!
>>
>> Two different movies based on the same story.
>>
>Are you *sure* it's the same book? The stories are quite different and
>then there's this:

The story clearly changes, but Fail Safe was directly based on the book
of the same name, and Dr. Strangelove is in many ways a parody of that
book.

Watch the two back to back for severe brain-twist.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
From: chuckcar on
kludge(a)panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote in
news:i34uqo$qp7$1(a)panix2.panix.com:

> In article <Xns9DC78773DB14Achuck(a)127.0.0.1>, chuckcar
> <chuck(a)nil.car> wrote:
>>=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>>wrote in news:4c50c0e0$0$74750$afc38c87(a)read01.usenet4all.se:
>>
>>> TCM tonight featuring movies that have no sound track whatsoever.
>>>
>>> I think it's 10PM, one of my favorties: Fail Safe. A cold war movie
>>> taken from a cold war novel, and the same book "Dr. Strangelove" was
>>> made from!
>>>
>>> Two different movies based on the same story.
>>>
>>Are you *sure* it's the same book? The stories are quite different and
>>then there's this:
>
> The story clearly changes, but Fail Safe was directly based on the
> book of the same name, and Dr. Strangelove is in many ways a parody of
> that book.
>
> Watch the two back to back for severe brain-twist.

Have you *read* both *books*? Hollywood has a long history of changing
stories to meet their competition at the box office among other reasons.
I have doubts whether the master would do it, And they both came out in
the exact same year.

I see your point, but you're challenging direct proof with logical
argument. Show me a link that shows *your* point.

--

(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )