Accident update
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Brown bin day!
Next: Bridge 1:0 Bus
From: Judith M Smith on 11 Dec 2009 02:47 On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:49:56 +0000, Phil W Lee <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote: >Marc <initial.surname(a)btintenret.com> considered Thu, 10 Dec 2009 >22:25:26 +0000 the perfect time to write: > >>Tim Dunne wrote: >>> On 10/12/2009 8:05PM, NM wrote: >>> >>> 8<... bollox. >>> >>> Liar. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> >>It was a bit obvious wasn't it? The idea that he had a friend! > >I'm not sure - didn't he say she'd written and demanded money from the >cyclist? >Given her previously noted record of crashing into the cyclist by >driving at him on the wrong side of the road, the menaces part is >obvious, so I don't think him having friends like that is all that >unlikely. > >The idea that the cyclist admitted liability is well up to his usual >standards though. >Unless that was after she "sent some of the boys 'round"? There is of course another possibility: What he has said is totally accurate. Did you find what he said unpalatable - is that your problem?
From: NM on 11 Dec 2009 03:22 On Dec 11, 5:49 am, Phil W Lee <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote: > Marc <initial.surn...(a)btintenret.com> considered Thu, 10 Dec 2009 > 22:25:26 +0000 the perfect time to write: > > >Tim Dunne wrote: > >> On 10/12/2009 8:05PM, NM wrote: > > >> 8<... bollox. > > >> Liar. > > >> Tim > > >It was a bit obvious wasn't it? The idea that he had a friend! > > I'm not sure - didn't he say she'd written and demanded money from the > cyclist? > Given her previously noted record of crashing into the cyclist by > driving at him on the wrong side of the road, the menaces part is > obvious, so I don't think him having friends like that is all that > unlikely. Thay 'previous record' is total fantasy on your part. > > The idea that the cyclist admitted liability is well up to his usual > standards though. > Unless that was after she "sent some of the boys 'round"? In fact your entire post is fantasy, you are one bitter twisted fucker, you need help.
From: JNugent on 11 Dec 2009 03:51 Se�or Chris wrote: > NM wrote: >> Some of you may recall about three weeks ago I posted about an >> accident my friend had where a cyclist collided with her car in >> Catford and ended up draped across the bonnet his bike still strapped >> to his feet. >> >> Numerous posts followed intimating I was liar, my friend should have >> her driving privilidges revoked, loads of personal abuse from cyclists >> who, with much wailing and gnashing of teeth, proclaimed that there >> was no way Johnny Cyclist could have been in any way to blame it was >> obviously the evil car driver. >> >> I was at her house on Monday evening and the subject came up, >> apparantly she had written to the cyclist in an attempt to gain >> settlement for the damage (I wasn't aware of this I had assumed she >> went throught her insurance as she said she was going to) >> >> He wrote a very nice letter back apologising for going too fast and >> explaining he hadn't seen her until too late and his foot was trapped >> in the clip so that was why he was lying on her bonnet. He admitted >> full responsibility before going on to explain his financial >> restraints and why he would not be able to pay for the damage except >> by drip feed payments. > You do have some strange fantasies. Why is that when he mentioned the positions of the vehicles on the road (among other things), you (or others) seized on that as though Holy Writ, but when he types the above, it must be "fantasy"? Does his credibility vary depending only on whether it chimes with what you wish to believe? Surely not?
From: Silk on 11 Dec 2009 04:05 On 10/12/2009 22:20, Tim Dunne wrote: > On 10/12/2009 8:05PM, NM wrote: > > 8<... bollox. > > Liar. > > Tim I remember you from the Blueyonder internal newsgroups. You were a complete knob then and I see nothing's changed.
From: Adrian on 11 Dec 2009 04:19
Judith M Smith <judithmsmith(a)live.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: > There is of course another possibility: > > What he has said is totally accurate. Which bit? His story changed about five times. |