From: Happi Monday on
mileburner wrote:

> Sheesh!

Lamb or chicken?
From: Happi Monday on
BrianW wrote:

>
> Hey, Nik, did you pass to your friend the free legal advice I
> generously gave in the original thread?

Why would she need legal advice when the cyclist rammed her then
admitted liability?
From: Keitht on
The Medway Handyman wrote:
> NM wrote:
>> On 12 Dec, 01:32, Se�or Chris <u...(a)domain.invalid> wrote:
>>> JNugent wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does his credibility vary depending only on whether it chimes with
>>>> what you wish to believe? Surely not?
>>> No, his credibility is permanently stuck at zero. The entire episode
>>> is a complete fantasy.
>> Evidence for this assertion?
>
> Cyclists are not good at evidence or any other rational thought.
>
>

That's ALL cyclists then?

Are we to believe then that all people who label themselves as
'handyman' (ie, not having a proper job but pretending to know things
about building trades) are all bigots behind the wheel?

It's your terminology -- not mine.
Your rules, no-one else's.

--
Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle
From: The Medway Handyman on
Keitht wrote:
> The Medway Handyman wrote:
>> NM wrote:
>>> On 12 Dec, 01:32, Se�or Chris <u...(a)domain.invalid> wrote:
>>>> JNugent wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does his credibility vary depending only on whether it chimes with
>>>>> what you wish to believe? Surely not?
>>>> No, his credibility is permanently stuck at zero. The entire
>>>> episode is a complete fantasy.
>>> Evidence for this assertion?
>>
>> Cyclists are not good at evidence or any other rational thought.
>>
>>
>
> That's ALL cyclists then?

All of the ones around here.

> Are we to believe then that all people who label themselves as
> 'handyman' (ie, not having a proper job but pretending to know things
> about building trades) are all bigots behind the wheel?

Believe what you like pal. In your twisted cyclists mind anything can
become the truth.


--
Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist


From: Just zis Guy, you know? on
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:36:02 GMT, "The Medway Handyman"
<davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

>Believe what you like pal. In your twisted cyclists mind anything can
>become the truth.

Ah, bigotry. Unlike the things you ascribe to cyclists, that
genuinely does appear to be an inherent behaviour among drivers:

"A key finding which should be noted was that, when commenting on the
scenarios it was usually the behaviour of the cyclist that was
criticised � no matter how small the misdemeanour. Few links were
made between the cyclist�s behaviour and any external influences
that could be affecting their choice of behaviour; i.e. the
respondents� comments indicated that they thought the cyclist�s
actions were inherent and dispositional behaviours. In contrast, the
motorists� misdemeanours were excused or justified in terms of the
situational influences. As this tendency seemed to continue across
the groups and the individual depth interviews and was unprompted,
it is unlikely that group dynamics had any significant effect on
this finding. [...] This aligns with the psychological prediction of
targeting of members of an �out group�.."

Transport Research Laboratory research report 549, 2003

Nice to know that TRL's work was accurate in this case.

Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/urc
GPG public key at http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public-key.txt
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: Brown bin day!
Next: Bridge 1:0 Bus