Accident update
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Brown bin day!
Next: Bridge 1:0 Bus
From: mileburner on 12 Dec 2009 15:21 "NM" <nik.morgan(a)mac.com> wrote in message news:3bd687f4-d076-4001-8e8d-3e1c53712ec9(a)k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > On 12 Dec, 18:22, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >> NM wrote: >> > Try the words 'we are sorry we made a mistake', it's not too hard to >> > do. >> >> Sorry, I thought you were being serious. > > Not man enough? Trite remarks as a substitute. Bless. No seriously, when you first asked "who's fault is it?" I really was taken in and thought you actually wanted opinion. As time progressed (and you did not get the opinion you were seeking) it became obvious you were not being serious at all. Especially since you were chopping and changing the story daily.
From: mileburner on 13 Dec 2009 01:04 "Phil W Lee" <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote in message news:trf8i59ehkt2m6og964qe5jr9p7pii8ud7(a)4ax.com... > "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> considered Sat, 12 Dec 2009 > 20:21:16 -0000 the perfect time to write: >> >>No seriously, when you first asked "who's fault is it?" I really was taken >>in and thought you actually wanted opinion. >> >>As time progressed (and you did not get the opinion you were seeking) it >>became obvious you were not being serious at all. >> >>Especially since you were chopping and changing the story daily. >> > Oh come on now - I don't think he ever waited a whole day before > changing his story :) Fair point, I was (as usual) being generous.
From: mileburner on 13 Dec 2009 01:05 NM wrote: > > Case proved and closed, only the empty baseless claptrap of the > resident idiots left to disturb the peace. "Baseless claptrap" eh, reminds me of that little story NM posted...
From: Happi Monday on 13 Dec 2009 05:42 NM wrote: > On Dec 12, 2:27 pm, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: >> NM wrote: >>> On 12 Dec, 09:00, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: >>>> NM wrote: >>>>> On 11 Dec, 17:33, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: >>>>>> I think you are talking total bollox! (ie. you are making it up). >>>>>> And only a total idiot would admit liabilty. >>>>> Well he is a cyclist so the pattern fits. >>>> I do more motoring than cycling - in hour terms, not miles. >>>> I still say you are bullshitting or simply totally self-deluded. >>> As I said to your friend, The cyclist has admitted it, case closed, so >>> it matters little how you care to view the facts. >>> Even when blindingly obvious you still will not admit the cyclist was >>> wrong, you would rather accuse me of lying than admit that. >> The problem is, the way you originally presented the "facts", it was >> totally obvious the driver was responsible. Even after you massaged the >> facts, it was ambiguous, at best. >> >> Of course, it doesn't matter what I think about it, but the fact that >> you came back asking for an apology tells me you do care what I and >> others think. >> I stick to my original assertion that you are lying about the cyclist >> admitting liability. > > I would expect nothing else. it goes to underline just how bigoted > cyclists can be when one of their own is called into question. Why do you insist on calling me a cyclist?
From: Happi Monday on 13 Dec 2009 05:42
The Medway Handyman wrote: >> I would expect nothing else. it goes to underline just how bigoted >> cyclists can be when one of their own is called into question. > > Its quite incredible isn't it? Like some kind of zombie belief system. > > Not one of the posts from cyclists has contained anything but childish > personal attacks on you. > > Maybe its something to do with those half a melon helmets affecting their > brains? I don't wear a melon. |