From: Raymond Keattch on
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:50:42 +0100, David Taylor <davidt-news(a)yadt.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 2007-04-17, Raymond Keattch <ray(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>> I start a 14 month training programme in May, starting with a nine week
>> residential course either in Watford or Leeds. This is followed by 12
>> months training with a mentor at Kings Cross.
>
> Congratulations.
>
>> So, if you are travelling to Kings Cross after July, it may be me
>> pressing the buttons - be scared!!!
>
> Having (for some reason) attempted to run Kings Cross for a day using
> SimSig (http://www.simsig.co.uk), it is perhaps you that should be
> scared!

I have used that software for a while, and as you may know it is the
software used in the Kings Cross control room (although SimSig for public
use is not the full blown software)!


--
MrBitsy
From: Daytona on
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:50:42 +0000 (UTC), David Taylor
<davidt-news(a)yadt.co.uk> wrote:

>Having (for some reason) attempted to run Kings Cross for a day using
>SimSig (http://www.simsig.co.uk), it is perhaps you that should be scared!

When I saw that yesterday, I decided to try Royston <g> !

Fascinating how a bunch of signalers manage to build a piece of
simulation software for a hobby that Network Rail themselves consider
is so realistic that they use it for training. Good on 'em, I hope
they made good money out of it.

Daytona
From: Raymond Keattch on
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:58:31 +0100, Daytona <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:50:42 +0000 (UTC), David Taylor
> <davidt-news(a)yadt.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Having (for some reason) attempted to run Kings Cross for a day using
>> SimSig (http://www.simsig.co.uk), it is perhaps you that should be
>> scared!
>
> When I saw that yesterday, I decided to try Royston <g> !
>
> Fascinating how a bunch of signalers manage to build a piece of
> simulation software for a hobby that Network Rail themselves consider
> is so realistic that they use it for training. Good on 'em, I hope
> they made good money out of it.

I will use Simsig as part of my training. As I understand it, I will have
to learn everything from manual signal boxes right up to computer
controlled (Simsig) - should be fascinating!



--
MrBitsy
From: Clive George on
"Raymond Keattch" <ray(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:op.tqzue6zlb0v0sj(a)fsmain...

> I will use Simsig as part of my training. As I understand it, I will have
> to learn everything from manual signal boxes right up to computer
> controlled (Simsig) - should be fascinating!

You going to come up here and use the proper signal boxes we still have,
complete with huge great levers? :-)

cheers,
clive

From: john doe on

"Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1hwqnl7.12wytrb1xraw8fN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk...
> Raymond Keattch <ray(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps you can expand on that - how does a signaller stop you from
>> working (be nice to know your job)?
>
> With that attitude, he's a trackside worker of some sort.

sorry, i didn't mean it to sound it that way, should have put a smiley.

i do work trackside and most of my dealings with signallers is whilst taking
a temporary block for engineering work.

this can be a problem nowadays because there are so many firms involved in
any job that trying to get the proper authorisation no's so the signaller
will let us go on track can be a real nightmare, as i said some signallers
realise its like this and will try to help us sort things out, some will do
anything to throw a spanner in the works, although, as a agency employee its
better for me if the job gets cancelled because it means i get another shift
out of it! :-)

i've often thought it looks like quite an interesting job, hope you enjoy
it.

james