From: chuckcar on 1 Apr 2010 16:56 Scott in Florida <MoveOn(a)Outa.here> wrote in news:imj9r55goq490uofk37hgv0gihfq0cptkn(a)4ax.com: >>> They go thru the movies and cut out all the curse words. Hey we are >>> big kids now and can handle it. >>> >>That's The US Government regulations. It has nothing to do with the >>station. > > It is NOT! > No? who stopped them from having any nudity in films from the 1930's until the 1970's then? Who created the comic book code in the 1950's? The precedent was set by those. There *may* not be any actual laws governing it (something I am virtually certain is nonsence - otherwise Ibsons' and Howard Sterns' radio stations/networks wouldn't have got fines from guess who? Stern isn't even *allowed* on broadcast radio anymore *because* of it. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: chuckcar on 1 Apr 2010 16:56 Tegger <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in news:Xns9D4D4C27CBE66tegger(a)208.90.168.18: > chuckcar <chuck(a)nil.car> wrote in > news:Xns9D4CE3DD3950Dchuck(a)127.0.0.1: > > An editorial that comments on a very real action by the Canadian > government. You never read the editorial, that's plain. Do you > think NP invented the idea of Rob Nicholson and his report? > > You're like most Usenet posters who, when faced with facts they > dislike, denounce the poster of the facts, and then refuse to do > their own research to refute the poster's assertions. > No, just that editorials can have exageration for effect and don't have to contrain to the "standards of truth" that other articles have. Therefore stretching of the facts and outright lies occur in them. That's all I meant. Look, I have serious problems with the way Can Con works. I have from the start. But I think it comes down to them not getting and keeping bright enough people in government to do the job properly. A point that was proved quite clearly when Patrick Watson quit as the head of the CBC. The bureaucrats under him wouldn't follow his orders. That's straight from his mouth. > >> >>> The cops have been allowed to use DUI spot-checks as >>> fishing-expeditions since the '80s. Ask any cop. >> >> And if you aren't impared and have your licence and insurance with >> you, you go on after ten minutes. what's your point and your froth >> coming from? Get caught using a cell phone? > > If you can't see the authoritarian damage that the new law will do, > and the authoritarian damage that the old spot-check ruling does, > then you're another reason I want to leave this country. > I don't want to live in a country where people are happy to live > in a straitjacket. > > There's a huge reason that Canadian cops were under much more > restrictive constraints until the '70s than they are now. > I *do* see the authoritarian results thereof, but that's part and parcel of what some cops are all about. I'd bet money that a *large* chunk of cops become police *because* they can throw their weight around. As for the effect on traffic stops, that point I made about the flashlight wasn't just made up, I was in a car when it happened - outside of Smith Falls. It was a DUI stop. The driver happened to not have his insurance. Exactly the same as a cop opening a drawer when he's in your house: he wouldn't know that the insurance wasn't in the car unless he stopped without cause. They *only* fined him for not having his insurance in the car. Nothing other action was taken. I even mentioned at the time that I didn't think it was a valid stop or chase - and they *did* chase us and several other cars. With lights flashing. I just put it down to some people are aholes and like to push others around. So they give them a whistle to shut them up. That sort of thing happens *everywhere*. Here's the most recent famous one IMHO. In Australia this past weekend. And you'll find that it's far more a right wing tendency than left. Something *far* more prevalent in the US than in Canada. I don't say this due to dislike of the (overmanipulated IMHO) citizens of the US, but from dislike of the people *doing* that manipulation. <http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Australia-F1-Driver-Lewis-Hamilton-Has-Car-Towed-By-Police-For-Motoring-Offence/Article/201003415583778?lpos=World_News_Carousel_Region_4&lid=ARTICLE_15583778_Australia%3A_F1_Driver_Lewis_Hamilton_Has_Car_Towed_By_Police_For_Motoring_Offence> Really, I'm not trolling you, I'm just trying to make some points I think may have missed. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: cuhulin on 1 Apr 2010 23:39 Sometimes I watch Trailer Park Boys, on the T101 channel.Only on DirecTV. It comes on tv tonight at midnight.I don't stay awake that late anymore. cuhulin
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 2 Apr 2010 00:20 On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:56:02 +0000, chuckcar wrote: > But I think it comes down to them not getting and keeping bright > enough people in government to do the job properly. Isn't this the basic problem in most countries? Shoot, look at Pelosi. She's the poster girl for Term Limits.
From: chuckcar on 2 Apr 2010 01:36
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in news:hp3rb5$rfe$2(a)news.eternal-september.org: > On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:56:02 +0000, chuckcar wrote: > >> But I think it comes down to them not getting and keeping bright >> enough people in government to do the job properly. > > Isn't this the basic problem in most countries? Shoot, look at Pelosi. > She's the poster girl for Term Limits. > No, that would be Max Mosely - changed the regulations so he could go beyond what they said and then changed them back again before he quit. Pelosi was elected despite some very badly tampered with polls. It just means she got her seat that much more legitimately. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) ) |