Another car damages another house.
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Tony Dragon on 27 Mar 2010 16:11 Mrcheerful wrote: > Doug wrote: >> On 27 Mar, 16:41, "Mrcheerful" <nbk...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >>> Doug wrote: >>>> On 27 Mar, 10:58, Tony Dragon <tony.dra...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >>>>> The Medway Handyman wrote: >>>>>> Doug wrote: >>>>>>> On 26 Mar, 09:03, "The Medway Handyman" <davidl...(a)no-spam- >>>>>>> blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>> Doug wrote: >>>>>>>> You claim to have been rammed in this video - >>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg4WOmrwXPg >>>>>>>> The video is 26 seconds long. Could you specify exactly when you >>>>>>>> were rammed? >>>>>>> When the video cuts off and causing my thumb to slip on the >>>>>>> camera button. Try reading the text that accompanies the video. >>>>>> How could you be rammed by the taxi you were filming? >>>>> And why was he preventing the taxi's right to pass & repass? >>>> I wasn't. >>>> As the video shows the taxi had been corked as it was about to turn >>>> right, with a queue of traffic behind it, by other riders to prevent >>>> the remaining CM riders from being blocked. I was situated so as to >>>> leave a gap for the taxi to exit right but it drive deliberately at >>>> my back wheel instead and the driver then gave me the finger. >>>> It is extremely difficult trying to video a ramming as it takes >>>> place, partly because of its quick unexpectedness and partly to get >>>> a full view of the point of contact as it occurs. >>> must have been a very minor contact since there is no apparent >>> movement of the bike >>> >> Can't you read? The camera went off at the instant of ramming also the >> text accompanying the video explains. Duh! > > You need to make the text clearer, duh! > > I thought it was a video of you being rammed, the text does not make it > clear that you are filming someone else and then get rammed (not in shot at > all) I had assumed (as most people would )that the cycle in front of the > taxi is you and is the one that is rammed) > So there is no evidence on video at all that anyone was 'rammed'. Glad that > is cleared up. > > Doug has been touting that video as being proof that he was 'rammed' for some months now. -- Tony Dragon
From: Theo's Trio on 27 Mar 2010 20:24 On 27 Mar, 10:07, FrengaX <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: > On Mar 26, 6:53 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > > > <The usual drivel> > > And ...? > > Driver crashes into house, is arrested. Enquiries under way. So what? "Man arrested after car hits house in Ilford ........He was taken to hospital but was later discharged and arrested on suspicion of failing to provide a breath test and failing to stop for police." How can some one be arrested on suspicion of failing to provide a breath test??? what did the police say, "excuse me sir, we suspect you didn't provide us with a breath test, you are under arrest". Is this comment accurate?
From: Ian Jackson on 28 Mar 2010 03:43 In message <02c3e0d9-e39b-4ca2-bd9c-151ff4292451(a)l36g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, Theo's Trio <theos.trio(a)googlemail.com> writes >On 27 Mar, 10:07, FrengaX <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 26, 6:53�am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >> >> > �<The usual drivel> >> >> And ...? >> >> Driver crashes into house, is arrested. Enquiries under way. So what? > >"Man arrested after car hits house in Ilford ........He was taken to >hospital but was later discharged and arrested on suspicion of failing >to provide a breath test and failing to stop for police." > >How can some one be arrested on suspicion of failing to provide a >breath test??? what did the police say, "excuse me sir, we suspect >you didn't provide us with a breath test, you are under arrest". > >Is this comment accurate? > Maybe they forgot to ask him for one? -- Ian
From: The Medway Handyman on 28 Mar 2010 06:03 Mr. Benn wrote: > "Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message > news:da3d944d-23ba-42a8-817e-472f13fc2ad1(a)t23g2000yqt.googlegroups.com... >> On 27 Mar, 10:58, Tony Dragon <tony.dra...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >>> The Medway Handyman wrote: >>>> Doug wrote: >>>>> On 26 Mar, 09:03, "The Medway Handyman" <davidl...(a)no-spam- >>>>> blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>> Doug wrote: >>> >>>>>> You claim to have been rammed in this video - >>> >>>>>> ? >>> >>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg4WOmrwXPg >>> >>>>>> The video is 26 seconds long. Could you specify exactly when you >>>>>> were rammed? >>> >>>>> When the video cuts off and causing my thumb to slip on the camera >>>>> button. Try reading the text that accompanies the video. >>> >>>> How could you be rammed by the taxi you were filming? >>> >>> And why was he preventing the taxi's right to pass & repass? >>> >> I wasn't. >> >> As the video shows the taxi had been corked as it was about to turn >> right, with a queue of traffic behind it, by other riders to prevent >> the remaining CM riders from being blocked. I was situated so as to >> leave a gap for the taxi to exit right but it drive deliberately at >> my back wheel instead and the driver then gave me the finger. >> >> It is extremely difficult trying to video a ramming as it takes >> place, partly because of its quick unexpectedness and partly to get >> a full view of the point of contact as it occurs. > > I hope you enjoyed it. I presume you wanted to be rammed. I think he does. Its this psycolists "I have rights" bollox. They think they have the right to deliberately hold up traffic. -- Dave - the small piece of 14th century armour used to protect the armpit.
From: Tony Dragon on 28 Mar 2010 06:41
Doug wrote: > On 27 Mar, 10:58, Tony Dragon <tony.dra...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >> The Medway Handyman wrote: >>> Doug wrote: >>>> On 26 Mar, 09:03, "The Medway Handyman" <davidl...(a)no-spam- >>>> blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >>>>> Doug wrote: >>>>> You claim to have been rammed in this video - >>>>> ? >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg4WOmrwXPg >>>>> The video is 26 seconds long. Could you specify exactly when you were >>>>> rammed? >>>> When the video cuts off and causing my thumb to slip on the camera >>>> button. Try reading the text that accompanies the video. >>> How could you be rammed by the taxi you were filming? >> And why was he preventing the taxi's right to pass & repass? >> > I wasn't. > > As the video shows the taxi had been corked obstructed > as it was about to turn > right, with a queue of traffic behind it, by other riders to prevent > the remaining CM riders from being blocked. Can't have CM stopped in trafic can we? > I was situated so as to > leave a gap for the taxi to exit right but it drive deliberately at my > back wheel instead and the driver then gave me the finger. > > It is extremely difficult trying to video a ramming as it takes place, > partly because of its quick unexpectedness and partly to get a full > view of the point of contact as it occurs. > > -- > Critical Mass London > http://www.criticalmasslondon.org.uk > "Get out of my way you f*ing cyclist" > As you have told us 'ramming' takes place all the time on CM, you should have no problem videoing it. Any comments on the lawbreaking that you have filmed? -- Tony Dragon |