From: thirty-six on
On 25 May, 07:12, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> "The Medway Handyman" <davidl...(a)no-spam-blueyonder.co.uk> gurgled
> happily, sounding much like they were saying:
>
> > Do push bikes require type approval?  No.
>
> Yes, actually.

If you mean British standards they are applied at point of sale
(supposedly) so are not 'type approval'.
From: Adrian on
thirty-six <thirty-six(a)live.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

>> > Do push bikes require type approval?  No.

>> Yes, actually.

> If you mean British standards they are applied at point of sale
> (supposedly) so are not 'type approval'.

<little check>
No, you're right. My bad.

However, they are most certainly subject to the Construction & Use regs.
From: Dr Zoidberg on

"Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message
news:96bc7102-785b-4b10-8e7a-42515ed88e9f(a)a16g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
> On 24 May, 06:20, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>> No cyclist could do this much damage which clearly proves how much
>> more dangerous cars are.
>>
>> "Driver flees when car hits house near Norwich
>>
>> Car embedded in side of bungalow, near Norwich
<snip>
>>
> Update
>
> A man has been charged with drink driivng.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/8700583.stm

So he was drunk and speeding when he crashed, and has been charged.

He has broken the law and is being dealt with appropriately.

What's the problem?

--
Alex

From: Derek C on
On May 25, 7:46 am, "Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOOO!!!...@drzoidberg.co.uk>
wrote:
> "Doug" <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote in message
>
> news:96bc7102-785b-4b10-8e7a-42515ed88e9f(a)a16g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On 24 May, 06:20, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
> >> No cyclist could do this much damage which clearly proves how much
> >> more dangerous cars are.
>
> >> "Driver flees when car hits house near Norwich
>
> >> Car embedded in side of bungalow, near Norwich
> <snip>
>
> > Update
>
> > A man has been charged with drink driivng.
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/8700583.stm
>
> So he was drunk and speeding when he crashed, and has been charged.
>
> He has broken the law and is being dealt with appropriately.
>
> What's the problem?
>
> --

I wish that a few more law breaking, red light jumping, footpath
riding, drunken, dangerous, speeding cyclists could be dealt with
appropriately by the law?

Derek C

From: Conor on
On 24/05/2010 06:20, Doug wrote:

...nothing as usual.

--
Conor I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.