Another killer driver smashes a shop and kills a boy.
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: David Hansen on 17 May 2010 03:10 On Sun, 16 May 2010 13:25:44 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be McKevvy <vicko_zoomba(a)hotmail.com> wrote this:- >I hope you find out personally the destructive force of a car. >Preferrably by having your head squashed against the car bumber and a >stone wall. Noted. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/ukpga_20000023_en_8#pt3-pb3-l1g54
From: Brimstone on 17 May 2010 04:01 "Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message news:e821dd39-7f23-4dd0-ac67-9b4a35c0f9e3(a)r9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com... > On 16 May, 19:26, webreader <websiterea...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> On May 16, 6:33 pm, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >> >> > Once again demonstrating the sheer deadly destructiveness of a car >> > compare to that of a bicycle. Nowhere is safe from these terrorists. >> >> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/8684999.stm >> >> > "Boy trapped between car and shop front dies >> <news report snipped> >> >> Yet again Doug changes his saved text slightly & tells us that a car >> can do more damage than a bicycle. >> Doug the person who does not understand physics has actually hit on >> something that is mostly true, cars can cause more damage than >> bicycles due to their extra weight & speed. >> >> No doubt Dougs usual followers will be along to quote some lie that >> people have said otherwise. >> >> But to help Doug get the message accross here are a few of his posts. >> <list of Doug's repetitions snipped> >> > Wow! Someone has been doing thier research. OK then, as long as the > physics is widely accepted it should be obvious why cars should be > much more restricted than bicycles. ~In what way are cars not more restricted than bicycles Doug? > Incidentally, what if the dead boy had been riding a bike on the > pavement? More to the point, if the boy had been killed by a cyclist would you be shouting quite so loudly Doug?
From: Doug on 17 May 2010 04:43 On 17 May, 09:01, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > "Doug" <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote in message > > news:e821dd39-7f23-4dd0-ac67-9b4a35c0f9e3(a)r9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com...> On 16 May, 19:26, webreader <websiterea...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> On May 16, 6:33 pm, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > > >> > Once again demonstrating the sheer deadly destructiveness of a car > >> > compare to that of a bicycle. Nowhere is safe from these terrorists. > > >> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/8684999.stm > > >> > "Boy trapped between car and shop front dies > > <news report snipped> > > >> Yet again Doug changes his saved text slightly & tells us that a car > >> can do more damage than a bicycle. > >> Doug the person who does not understand physics has actually hit on > >> something that is mostly true, cars can cause more damage than > >> bicycles due to their extra weight & speed. > > >> No doubt Dougs usual followers will be along to quote some lie that > >> people have said otherwise. > > >> But to help Doug get the message accross here are a few of his posts. > > <list of Doug's repetitions snipped> > > > > > Wow! Someone has been doing thier research. OK then, as long as the > > physics is widely accepted it should be obvious why cars should be > > much more restricted than bicycles. > > ~In what way are cars not more restricted than bicycles Doug? > > > Incidentally, what if the dead boy had been riding a bike on the > > pavement? > > More to the point, if the boy had been killed by a cyclist would you be > shouting quite so loudly Doug? > Why do you always confine yourself to asking questions, Brim? Is it because you are scared of revealing your own opinions here? -- UK Radical Campaigns. http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill.
From: Derek C on 17 May 2010 04:43 On 16 May, 18:33, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > Once again demonstrating the sheer deadly destructiveness of a car > compare to that of a bicycle. Nowhere is safe from these terrorists. > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/8684999.stm > > "Boy trapped between car and shop front dies > > The crash scene in Cape Hill, Smethwick > > The boy was trapped between the car and the shop > > A 15-year-old boy who was trapped against a shop front in Smethwick by > a crashed car has died of his injuries. > > The crash happened on Saturday morning in Cape Hill, police said. > > The boy was airlifted to hospital where he died at 1730 BST. A female > was also taken to hospital with serious injuries, West Midlands Police > said. > > The driver, a 28-year-old man from Evesham, Worcestershire, was > arrested and bailed. Anyone with information has been asked to call > the police." > > -- Typical posting from Dugh, who now that he is no longer able to drive and is reduced to riding an electric bike, takes every opportunity and every excuse to attack those who are going about their lawful business by driving cars and other vehicles! Terrorists are people who set off bombs and deliberate shoot people, BTW, although many pedestrians regard speeding and aggressive cyclists who ride on footpaths as terrorists. Derek C
From: Brimstone on 17 May 2010 05:04
"Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message news:b573019c-3c3e-487a-82f4-25459bbdc5ce(a)y21g2000vba.googlegroups.com... > On 17 May, 09:01, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> "Doug" <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote in message >> >> news:e821dd39-7f23-4dd0-ac67-9b4a35c0f9e3(a)r9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com...> >> On 16 May, 19:26, webreader <websiterea...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >> On May 16, 6:33 pm, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >> >> >> > Once again demonstrating the sheer deadly destructiveness of a car >> >> > compare to that of a bicycle. Nowhere is safe from these terrorists. >> >> >> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/8684999.stm >> >> >> > "Boy trapped between car and shop front dies >> >> <news report snipped> >> >> >> Yet again Doug changes his saved text slightly & tells us that a car >> >> can do more damage than a bicycle. >> >> Doug the person who does not understand physics has actually hit on >> >> something that is mostly true, cars can cause more damage than >> >> bicycles due to their extra weight & speed. >> >> >> No doubt Dougs usual followers will be along to quote some lie that >> >> people have said otherwise. >> >> >> But to help Doug get the message accross here are a few of his posts. >> >> <list of Doug's repetitions snipped> >> >> >> >> > Wow! Someone has been doing thier research. OK then, as long as the >> > physics is widely accepted it should be obvious why cars should be >> > much more restricted than bicycles. >> >> ~In what way are cars not more restricted than bicycles Doug? >> >> > Incidentally, what if the dead boy had been riding a bike on the >> > pavement? >> >> More to the point, if the boy had been killed by a cyclist would you be >> shouting quite so loudly Doug? >> > Why do you always confine yourself to asking questions, Brim? Is it > because you are scared of revealing your own opinions here? > So that's a "No, I would not be shouting if this poor boy had been killed by a cyclist" is it Doug? |