Another killer driver smashes a shop and kills a boy.
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Doug on 24 May 2010 02:07 On 24 May, 06:51, Tony Dragon <tony.dra...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > Tom Crispin wrote: > > On Sun, 23 May 2010 23:27:17 +0100, Tony Dragon > > <tony.dra...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > > >> You mean I can kill someone on the pavement & get away with it? > > > In many cases, yes. > > You mean I can't do it all the time? > No your licence to kill has conditions and is restricted only to certain circumstances, particularly if the victim is allotted full blame for their own death. Another is if there are no witnesses. The killing has to be on a road or pavement though. Anywhere else doesn't apply and it has to be done with a vehicle weapon. It is no use expecting your licence to kill to cover any other type of weapon or location. One possibility currently under consideration is if you are using, say, a Toyota which has faults which causes it to lose control, in which case you might still be fully licenced to kill even though the victim has no blame. -- UK Radical Campaigns. http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill.
From: Tom Crispin on 24 May 2010 02:34 On Mon, 24 May 2010 06:51:01 +0100, Tony Dragon <tony.dragon(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >Tom Crispin wrote: >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 23:27:17 +0100, Tony Dragon >> <tony.dragon(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >> >>> You mean I can kill someone on the pavement & get away with it? >> >> In many cases, yes. > >You mean I can't do it all the time? No. The evil Dr Harold Shipman might have got away with killing one or two of his patients. But when the slaughter reached triple digits people started to be suspicious. Likewise, you might get away with killing one or two pedestrians, but if the numbers got into triple digits even the least suspicious of police investigators might consider homocide as a cause.
From: GT on 26 May 2010 04:47
"Tom Crispin" <kije.remove(a)this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote in message news:q67kv5puu2ut9o0uitjd9119ut6d2pf5i8(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 24 May 2010 06:51:01 +0100, Tony Dragon > <tony.dragon(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > >>Tom Crispin wrote: >>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 23:27:17 +0100, Tony Dragon >>> <tony.dragon(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >>> >>>> You mean I can kill someone on the pavement & get away with it? >>> >>> In many cases, yes. >> >>You mean I can't do it all the time? > > No. > > The evil Dr Harold Shipman might have got away with killing one or two > of his patients. But when the slaughter reached triple digits people > started to be suspicious. > > Likewise, you might get away with killing one or two pedestrians, but > if the numbers got into triple digits even the least suspicious of > police investigators might consider homocide as a cause. You have a very strange grasp of british law and are talking out of a hole in your rear. |