From: BrianW on
On Apr 4, 7:18�am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
> And the motorists here have the barefaced cheek to keep banging on
> about cyclists on pavements!
>
> "Man dies as car hits Birmingham bus shelter

Good wank, was it Doug? I guess it brightened up your Easter Sunday -
after all, you are not allowed to go shopping, as you keep on
reminding us.
From: Derek C on
On Apr 4, 8:53 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
> On 4 Apr, 08:46, Tony Dragon <tony.dra...(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

> > Doug wrote:
> > > And the motorists here have the barefaced cheek to keep banging on
> > > about cyclists on pavements!
>
> > > "Man dies as car hits Birmingham bus shelter
>
> > > A pedestrian was killed when a car crashed into a bus shelter in
> > > Birmingham.
>
> > > Emergency services were called to the scene in Stratford Road, Hall
> > > Green, on Friday morning.
>
> > > West Midlands Ambulance Service said a car appeared to have hit the
> > > bus shelter and also hit another car. The dead man was found in the
> > > shelter.
>
> > > A spokeswoman said the man was declared dead at the scene. Two women,
> > > both motorists, were unhurt."
>
> > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/8600977.stm
>
>
> > And in what way was this a deliberate action Doug, unlike footway cycling.
>
> > Oh I must have missed your report about your Christmas bin collection,
> > could you repost it.
>
> On the exceedingly rare occasions when a cyclist kills on a pavement
> that is not deliberate either.
>
> --
Point of order. The motorist(s) left the road and mounted the pavement
after some sort of accident, so they were not deliberating driving on
the pavement. Many cyclists routinely and deliberately ride on the
pavement, often at quite high speed and in a manner that is risky to
vulnerable pedestrians. There is a difference!

Derek C
From: Derek Geldard on
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 23:18:03 -0700 (PDT), Doug <jagmad(a)riseup.net>
wrote:

>
>"Man dies as car hits Birmingham bus shelter
>
>A pedestrian was killed when a car crashed into a bus shelter in
>Birmingham.
>

Doug says - "Everybody Party, Party, Party !

Derek

From: Marie on
On Apr 4, 8:53 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
> On 4 Apr, 08:46, Tony Dragon <tony.dra...(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> > Doug wrote:
> > > And the motorists here have the barefaced cheek to keep banging on
> > > about cyclists on pavements!
>
> > > "Man dies as car hits Birmingham bus shelter
>
> > > A pedestrian was killed when a car crashed into a bus shelter in
> > > Birmingham.
>
> > > Emergency services were called to the scene in Stratford Road, Hall
> > > Green, on Friday morning.
>
> > > West Midlands Ambulance Service said a car appeared to have hit the
> > > bus shelter and also hit another car. The dead man was found in the
> > > shelter.
>
> > > A spokeswoman said the man was declared dead at the scene. Two women,
> > > both motorists, were unhurt."
>
> > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/8600977.stm
>
> > > --
> > > UK Radical Campaigns
> > >www.zing.icom43.net
> > > A driving licence is a licence to kill.
>
> > And in what way was this a deliberate action Doug, unlike footway cycling.
>
> > Oh I must have missed your report about your Christmas bin collection,
> > could you repost it.
>
> On the exceedingly rare occasions when a cyclist kills on a pavement
> that is not deliberate either.
>
> --
> UK Radical Campaignswww.zing.icom43.net
> A driving licence is a licence to kill.

Good answer Doug, but nothing to do with the questions asked.
But there is no change there then.

You post a stupid link about an accident & try to equate it with
pavement cycling

Are you saying that this motorist drove on the pavement on purpose
like many cyclists do?

If so you are even more stupid than I thought, but you knew that there
was no connection & were just trying to score points like a spoilt
brat.

Then when you are asked a question about your answers you avoid/evade
answering because you have been caught out.

When are you going to do anything constructive about your aims,
instead of just whinging on & on?

The only effect you have in posting to NG's is to win the prize for
the most rubbish posted in the shortest time

You are without doubt the biggest hypocrite that I have ever seen,
your knowledge of the real world is so small it could be written on
the back of a first class stamp.
The only good use your posts are is to convince people that CM is
antisocial & that ART's are criminals.

Marie
From: Tony Dragon on
Marie wrote:
> On Apr 4, 8:53 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>> On 4 Apr, 08:46, Tony Dragon <tony.dra...(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Doug wrote:
>>>> And the motorists here have the barefaced cheek to keep banging on
>>>> about cyclists on pavements!
>>>> "Man dies as car hits Birmingham bus shelter
>>>> A pedestrian was killed when a car crashed into a bus shelter in
>>>> Birmingham.
>>>> Emergency services were called to the scene in Stratford Road, Hall
>>>> Green, on Friday morning.
>>>> West Midlands Ambulance Service said a car appeared to have hit the
>>>> bus shelter and also hit another car. The dead man was found in the
>>>> shelter.
>>>> A spokeswoman said the man was declared dead at the scene. Two women,
>>>> both motorists, were unhurt."
>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/8600977.stm
>>>> --
>>>> UK Radical Campaigns
>>>> www.zing.icom43.net
>>>> A driving licence is a licence to kill.
>>> And in what way was this a deliberate action Doug, unlike footway cycling.
>>> Oh I must have missed your report about your Christmas bin collection,
>>> could you repost it.
>> On the exceedingly rare occasions when a cyclist kills on a pavement
>> that is not deliberate either.
>>
>> --
>> UK Radical Campaignswww.zing.icom43.net
>> A driving licence is a licence to kill.
>
> Good answer Doug, but nothing to do with the questions asked.
> But there is no change there then.
>
> You post a stupid link about an accident & try to equate it with
> pavement cycling
>
> Are you saying that this motorist drove on the pavement on purpose
> like many cyclists do?
>
> If so you are even more stupid than I thought, but you knew that there
> was no connection & were just trying to score points like a spoilt
> brat.
>
> Then when you are asked a question about your answers you avoid/evade
> answering because you have been caught out.
>
> When are you going to do anything constructive about your aims,
> instead of just whinging on & on?
>
> The only effect you have in posting to NG's is to win the prize for
> the most rubbish posted in the shortest time
>
> You are without doubt the biggest hypocrite that I have ever seen,
> your knowledge of the real world is so small it could be written on
> the back of a first class stamp.
> The only good use your posts are is to convince people that CM is
> antisocial & that ART's are criminals.
>
> Marie

Don't worry Marie, Doug will answer the questions either today or
tomorrow, but the answers will have nothing to do with the questions.

--
Tony Dragon