From: Eeyore on


clifto wrote:

> samstone(a)aol.com wrote:
> > The change industry are the ones suggesting the 3000 mile
> > interval. Through commercials they've gained believers.
>
> I was taught 3,000 mile intervals long before there were companies that
> specialized in oil changes.
>
> I have a friend who changes his oil every 2,000 miles. I would rather
> buy one of his used cars than any new car, for quality reasons (though
> the price wouldn't hurt either).

Using synthetic oil would be far more sensible actually.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


SnoMan wrote:

> I have
> also run several vehicles well past 200K too and I have a few that are
> now 18 years old and older and still run great and use no oil between
> changes (I do not have to add).

My Saab uses no oil that I can notice and has 160,000 mi on it.

It had its oil changed regularly every 9,000 mi.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


Steve Barker wrote:

> So you'd spend fifty grand on a car, then abuse the engine. What a fukin
> idiot.

Do *YOU* use synthetic oil ? Not doing so is abusing the engine.

Graham


From: Eeyore on


Steve Barker wrote:

> Yeah, and why do they say this? 'Cause the government tells them to. Its
> an EPA thing, not the fact that the engine still needs the oil changed every
> 3000 miles.

No modern engine needs 3000 mi oil changes.

Mind you.... if you do insist on using dino oil !


Graham

From: Eeyore on


clifto wrote:

> Roy wrote:
> > I'm going to date myself, but before there were speedy oil changes and syn
> > oil the interval was 5,000+.
>
> The official automakers' figure, anyway. Good mechanics I knew were pushing
> 3K.

In the days of dinosaur oil that may have made sense.

Graham