From: Tomes on
"Tegger" <tegger(a)tegger.c0m> wrote in message
news:Xns990FB00E69193tegger(a)207.14.116.130...
> Sophie <none(a)yours> wrote in
> news:4mhq1391k5hq2i00du9ce95sn9d3pgspt8(a)4ax.com:
>> There aren't too many people that keep cars past 100,000 miles.
>
> The original owners may not have the cars past 100K, but those cars are
> still on the road up to 200-250K these days.
>
188K on the Sienna, 80K on the Jeep and it is very young, Expect the Prius
to go over 200K.....
Tomes


From: SMS on
Sophie wrote:

> There aren't too many people that keep cars past 100,000 miles.

Not sure where you live, but in California it's very very common because
the cars don't rust much.

> How
> long does a catalytic converter normaly last? I also thought the
> emissions warrenty on cars wast more than 100,000 miles. So if it
> can't be proven, how is anyone going to know the reason?

That's why you want to avoid products that are known to damage catalytic
converters, such as high-phosphorus, non-API motor oil.
From: Sophie on
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:01:17 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com>
wrote:

>Sophie wrote:
>
>> There aren't too many people that keep cars past 100,000 miles.
>
>Not sure where you live, but in California it's very very common because
>the cars don't rust much.

Where I live there is plenty of rust.


>> How
>> long does a catalytic converter normaly last? I also thought the
>> emissions warrenty on cars wast more than 100,000 miles. So if it
>> can't be proven, how is anyone going to know the reason?
>
>That's why you want to avoid products that are known to damage catalytic
>converters, such as high-phosphorus, non-API motor oil.

I'm still waiting to see proof of a real world test where this proven.
I did read an article where they ran a bench test and caused an oil
leak that pumped far more oil into the converter than would normally
happen in real world conditions, according to that same report.

If you have proof, cool, post it somewhere we can all read it.
From: clare at on
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:43:27 -0500, Sophie <none(a)yours> wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:01:17 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Sophie wrote:
>>
>>> There aren't too many people that keep cars past 100,000 miles.
>>
>>Not sure where you live, but in California it's very very common because
>>the cars don't rust much.
>
>Where I live there is plenty of rust.
>
>
>>> How
>>> long does a catalytic converter normaly last? I also thought the
>>> emissions warrenty on cars wast more than 100,000 miles. So if it
>>> can't be proven, how is anyone going to know the reason?
>>
>>That's why you want to avoid products that are known to damage catalytic
>>converters, such as high-phosphorus, non-API motor oil.
>
>I'm still waiting to see proof of a real world test where this proven.
>I did read an article where they ran a bench test and caused an oil
>leak that pumped far more oil into the converter than would normally
>happen in real world conditions, according to that same report.
>
>If you have proof, cool, post it somewhere we can all read it.


Well, might not be "proof" to you, but on my wife's 1988 New Yorker
(3 liter Mitsu-shitty) I was changing oil every 3 months,
occaisionally stretching to 6 (car got about 12000km a year put on it)
and the converter started to rattle and the car failled the E-test. I
replaced the cat, and all was fine, for another 2 years. I was not
noticing any apreciable oil consumption - never had to add between
changes, and NEVER saw or smelled any oil smoke. Car failed again so I
started to investigate. Figured the cat had died again - but what
caused it? I removed the cat and started the car and it became quite
obvious it was burning oil. I decided to check the valve seals, and it
became obvious why the engine was smoking, with the typical failed
Mitsu-shitty valve guides.
Installed rebuilt heads and another new cat and passed with flying
colors. Was it the oil, or the Phosphorous in the oil that killed the
cat?? We'll likely never know - but I did switch to the ZDDP free oil
from the "all fleet" that had been used.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: Scott Dorsey on
Sophie <none(a)yours> wrote:
>
>I'm still waiting to see proof of a real world test where this proven.
>I did read an article where they ran a bench test and caused an oil
>leak that pumped far more oil into the converter than would normally
>happen in real world conditions, according to that same report.

I dunno, I have seen some cars on the road that seemed to be burning more
oil than gasoline. Real-world conditions can be pretty harsh.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."