From: Albm&ctd on
In article <3i7ur5dknegi4kn8v2u9r6lsdd03egq9bb(a)4ax.com>, cynic(a)society.sux.ok
says...
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:18:27 +1000, Albm&ctd
> <alb_mandctdNOWMD(a)connexus.net.au> wrote:
>
> >The ultimate aim is not just to ban load pipes...
>
> I'm all for banning load pipes...
>
> =================
>
> Onya bike
>
> Gerry
>
What about lewd ones?

Al
--
I don't take sides.
It's more fun to insult everyone.
http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
From: atec7 7 ""atec77 " on
G-S wrote:
> D Walford wrote:
>> On 11/04/2010 8:37 AM, G-S wrote:
>>> Jason James wrote:
>>>> I love
>>>> the sound of a loud Ford V8, and if I could get away with it, I run
>>>> open pipes on it (when I had it),..the difference is, people love the
>>>> sound of a V8 as opposed to a Harley twin POS.
>>>
>>> There are a LOT of people who love the sound of a Harley with loud pipes
>>> (ok there's a lot who love the sound of a V8 too) and there are a lot of
>>> people who think Harley twins aren't POS.
>>>
>>> Having said that I've always thought it was rather odd that the police
>>> would hassle a bike with loud pipes UNLESS it was a Harley who always
>>> seemed to be left alone.
>>>
>>> If they are applying the noise regs across the board now then I don't
>>> have a problem with that.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Funny thing is that most of those loud bikes would even be too noisy
>> for a lot of race tracks like Sandown and Phillip Island which have
>> strict noise limits.
>>
>> Darylh
>>
>
> The noise limits at race tracks are a recent thing, the race bikes
> sounded better when they were louder.
>
> Look I'm not making excuses for loud bikes, I'm not saying it's morally
> excusable in some way.
>
> All I'm saying is they sound good :) [1]
>
>
> G-S
>
> [1] And that the racing isn't as good without the noise (now that you've
> mentioned racing)
Nothing like a Velocette 500 cc at full roar out the fishtale at 1oomph

or a 5pot japper at a million revs
From: atec7 7 ""atec77 " on
Albm&ctd wrote:

>>
> What's a biscuit master ??



nev with his hand off it for once ?
>
> Al
From: Albm&ctd on
In article <0l7ur51l6g1aq020e8abdlnfittqo5aba6(a)4ax.com>, cynic(a)society.sux.ok
says...
> I've had bikes since 1971. Never bothered with loud pipes. Never
> got hit by any cars. But then I ride sensibly (read "defensively").
>
Lucky yoooo.

Al
--
I don't take sides.
It's more fun to insult everyone.
http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
From: Albm&ctd on
In article <vJGvn.18367$pv.18342(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
knobdoodle(a)hotmail.com says...
> "Albm&ctd" <alb_mandctdNOWMD(a)connexus.net.au> wrote:
> > Back in the '70's I had a 350 twin with Dunstall Decibels (sp) (read loud)
> > then
> > I bought a 350-4 with four standard pipes that one could hardly hear. I
> > found
> > out quickly by the shocked look on one drivers faces that he failed to
> > hear the
> > quiet bike. It was close to a T-bone... not in my favour.
> >
> I was also of this opinion after switching frrom a noisy, rattly 860GTS to a
> quiet-as-a-mouse 500SL Pantah on which I was constantly being lane-changed
> onto!
> That was in 1982 though.
>
Silentiums like mine originally had, no doubt. Rusted quickly and made it a real
pain to remove the back wheel.

Al
--
I don't take sides.
It's more fun to insult everyone.
http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html