Blackwall Tunnel Closures
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Overtaking at roundabouts
Next: Saab sold to Spyker
From: NM on 25 Jan 2010 16:36 On 25 Jan, 21:21, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > NM wrote: > > On 25 Jan, 19:01, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > >> NM wrote: > >>> On 25 Jan, 13:36, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > >>>> "®i©ardo" <h...(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message > > >>>>news:Sge7n.31114$u23.16344(a)newsfe05.ams2... > > >>>>> Fine, as long as cyclists are prepared to pay for using the roads. > > >>>> Why? No one else does... > > >>> You know full well they do, so many times explained. You must enjoy > >>> looking like a cretin? > > >> No-one pays to use the roads. > > >> Registered keepers of motor vehicles pay VED to allow vehicles to be > >> used on the roads but: > > >> No-one pays to use the roads. > > >> HTH (but it probably wont :-( ) > > > As you well know that is semantics and bollox. > > You might call it semantics, I would call it the fact of the matter. Facts only a true dedicated pedant would quote to support his argument which is still bollox.
From: NM on 25 Jan 2010 16:38 On 25 Jan, 21:29, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > The Medway Handyman wrote: > > mileburner wrote: > > <WRIGGLE ALERT> > > >> No-one pays to use the roads. > > > <WRIGGLE ALERT> > > >> Registered keepers of motor vehicles pay VED to allow vehicles to be > >> used on the roads but: > > > <WRIGGLE ALERT> > > >> No-one pays to use the roads. > > And you point is exactly? > > You be telling us next that "drivers" pay "Road Tax" [sic] > > The only "Road Tax" [sic] I pay is as the registered keeper of vehicles. > > You'll be telling us soon that "cyclists" dont pay it. > > If that's the case, I should get a refund huh? I'd like that a rebate from something I've never paid, sounds attractive.
From: mileburner on 25 Jan 2010 16:40 NM wrote: > On 25 Jan, 21:21, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >> NM wrote: >>> On 25 Jan, 19:01, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >>>> NM wrote: >>>>> On 25 Jan, 13:36, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >>>>>> "�i�ardo" <h...(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message >> >>>>>> news:Sge7n.31114$u23.16344(a)newsfe05.ams2... >> >>>>>>> Fine, as long as cyclists are prepared to pay for using the >>>>>>> roads. >> >>>>>> Why? No one else does... >> >>>>> You know full well they do, so many times explained. You must >>>>> enjoy looking like a cretin? >> >>>> No-one pays to use the roads. >> >>>> Registered keepers of motor vehicles pay VED to allow vehicles to >>>> be used on the roads but: >> >>>> No-one pays to use the roads. >> >>>> HTH (but it probably wont :-( ) >> >>> As you well know that is semantics and bollox. >> >> You might call it semantics, I would call it the fact of the matter. > > Facts only a true dedicated pedant would quote to support his argument > which is still bollox. Don't get so upset over it.
From: mileburner on 25 Jan 2010 16:42 NM wrote: > On 25 Jan, 21:29, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >> >> You be telling us next that "drivers" pay "Road Tax" [sic] >> >> The only "Road Tax" [sic] I pay is as the registered keeper of >> vehicles. >> >> You'll be telling us soon that "cyclists" dont pay it. >> >> If that's the case, I should get a refund huh? > > I'd like that a rebate from something I've never paid, sounds > attractive. You miss the point. Drivers do not pay the Medway Road Tax. Cyclists do not pay the Medway Road Tax. The Medway Road Tax only exists in his mind.
From: NM on 25 Jan 2010 16:49
On 25 Jan, 21:40, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > NM wrote: > > On 25 Jan, 21:21, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > >> NM wrote: > >>> On 25 Jan, 19:01, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > >>>> NM wrote: > >>>>> On 25 Jan, 13:36, "mileburner" <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > >>>>>> "®i©ardo" <h...(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message > > >>>>>>news:Sge7n.31114$u23.16344(a)newsfe05.ams2... > > >>>>>>> Fine, as long as cyclists are prepared to pay for using the > >>>>>>> roads. > > >>>>>> Why? No one else does... > > >>>>> You know full well they do, so many times explained. You must > >>>>> enjoy looking like a cretin? > > >>>> No-one pays to use the roads. > > >>>> Registered keepers of motor vehicles pay VED to allow vehicles to > >>>> be used on the roads but: > > >>>> No-one pays to use the roads. > > >>>> HTH (but it probably wont :-( ) > > >>> As you well know that is semantics and bollox. > > >> You might call it semantics, I would call it the fact of the matter. > > > Facts only a true dedicated pedant would quote to support his argument > > which is still bollox. > > Don't get so upset over it. OK, Goodnight. |