From: st3ph3nm on
On May 25, 11:11 pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 01:59:23 -0700 (PDT), st3ph3nm <s...(a)hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On May 21, 4:59 pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote:
> >> On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:33:16 +0800, "Fraser Johnston"
>
> >> <ftr...(a)iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
> >> >> Interestingly at Wakefield, A lightly modified NC MX5 is only slightly
> >> >> slower than an Elise driven by a similarly skilled driver.
>
> >> >I highly doubt that.
>
> >> >Fraser
>
> >> Jeez Fraser,
> >> I posted the link to the last meeting, posted Youtube links to MX5s
> >> being "slightly slower" than Elises on other circuits
>
> >You posted some vids that say far more about the drivers involved than
> >the cars.  I note you didn't comment about the MX5 being left standing
> >still out of each corner in the second video.  Not to mention the MX5
> >that both cars pass like it's parked.
>
> I posted the Vids they showed the MX5 putting in a very good showing
> againt the Else....It is after all a "little slower"
>

....and ignored the rest of my post, I note.

Cheers,
Steve
From: OzOne on
On Wed, 26 May 2010 01:04:24 -0700 (PDT), st3ph3nm <sgam(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On May 25, 11:11�pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 May 2010 01:59:23 -0700 (PDT), st3ph3nm <s...(a)hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 21, 4:59�pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:33:16 +0800, "Fraser Johnston"
>>
>> >> <ftr...(a)iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> Interestingly at Wakefield, A lightly modified NC MX5 is only slightly
>> >> >> slower than an Elise driven by a similarly skilled driver.
>>
>> >> >I highly doubt that.
>>
>> >> >Fraser
>>
>> >> Jeez Fraser,
>> >> I posted the link to the last meeting, posted Youtube links to MX5s
>> >> being "slightly slower" than Elises on other circuits
>>
>> >You posted some vids that say far more about the drivers involved than
>> >the cars. �I note you didn't comment about the MX5 being left standing
>> >still out of each corner in the second video. �Not to mention the MX5
>> >that both cars pass like it's parked.
>>
>> I posted the Vids they showed the MX5 putting in a very good showing
>> againt the Else....It is after all a "little slower"
>>
>
>...and ignored the rest of my post, I note.
>

Clap clap clap.....It must have been a very nice post for you to be so
proud of it.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: st3ph3nm on
On May 25, 11:03 pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 14:23:42 +1000, "Noddy" <Mission.Cont...(a)NASA.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Of course, it pays to bear in mind that he *also* believes his supercharged
> >awd Magna is a world beating car too :)
>
> No Nod....As I've always stated the AWD Verada supercharged allows a
> very good chassis to reach its potential ...which happens to be a lot
> higher than many others and as good as a WRX.
>
> If you regard a WRX as being a world beater then so be it....
>

2 or 3 Production World Rally Championships would define it as a world
beater, wouldn't it?

Cheers,
Steve
From: OzOne on
On Wed, 26 May 2010 01:29:47 -0700 (PDT), st3ph3nm <sgam(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:


>2 or 3 Production World Rally Championships would define it as a world
>beater, wouldn't it?
>
>Cheers,
>Steve

Actually it sucks compared to the real World beater, Lancia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Rally_Championship_records

Abnd as a road car the Subaru WRX is no world beater.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on
On Tue, 25 May 2010 19:18:00 GMT, John McKenzie
<jmac_melbourne(a)bigpond.com> wrote:


>More importantly, reading the advertising is the closest Oz has ever
>come to driving, racing and winning in any of them. Funny how he's let
>that slip without realising how obvious a 'tell' it is.

Sorry no relation to any obvious tells ;{




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.