From: st3ph3nm on 26 May 2010 04:04 On May 25, 11:11 pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 01:59:23 -0700 (PDT), st3ph3nm <s...(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > >On May 21, 4:59 pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote: > >> On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:33:16 +0800, "Fraser Johnston" > > >> <ftr...(a)iinet.net.au> wrote: > > >> >> Interestingly at Wakefield, A lightly modified NC MX5 is only slightly > >> >> slower than an Elise driven by a similarly skilled driver. > > >> >I highly doubt that. > > >> >Fraser > > >> Jeez Fraser, > >> I posted the link to the last meeting, posted Youtube links to MX5s > >> being "slightly slower" than Elises on other circuits > > >You posted some vids that say far more about the drivers involved than > >the cars. I note you didn't comment about the MX5 being left standing > >still out of each corner in the second video. Not to mention the MX5 > >that both cars pass like it's parked. > > I posted the Vids they showed the MX5 putting in a very good showing > againt the Else....It is after all a "little slower" > ....and ignored the rest of my post, I note. Cheers, Steve
From: OzOne on 26 May 2010 04:18 On Wed, 26 May 2010 01:04:24 -0700 (PDT), st3ph3nm <sgam(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On May 25, 11:11�pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote: >> On Tue, 25 May 2010 01:59:23 -0700 (PDT), st3ph3nm <s...(a)hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On May 21, 4:59�pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote: >> >> On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:33:16 +0800, "Fraser Johnston" >> >> >> <ftr...(a)iinet.net.au> wrote: >> >> >> >> Interestingly at Wakefield, A lightly modified NC MX5 is only slightly >> >> >> slower than an Elise driven by a similarly skilled driver. >> >> >> >I highly doubt that. >> >> >> >Fraser >> >> >> Jeez Fraser, >> >> I posted the link to the last meeting, posted Youtube links to MX5s >> >> being "slightly slower" than Elises on other circuits >> >> >You posted some vids that say far more about the drivers involved than >> >the cars. �I note you didn't comment about the MX5 being left standing >> >still out of each corner in the second video. �Not to mention the MX5 >> >that both cars pass like it's parked. >> >> I posted the Vids they showed the MX5 putting in a very good showing >> againt the Else....It is after all a "little slower" >> > >...and ignored the rest of my post, I note. > Clap clap clap.....It must have been a very nice post for you to be so proud of it. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: st3ph3nm on 26 May 2010 04:29 On May 25, 11:03 pm, Oz...(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 14:23:42 +1000, "Noddy" <Mission.Cont...(a)NASA.com> > wrote: > > >Of course, it pays to bear in mind that he *also* believes his supercharged > >awd Magna is a world beating car too :) > > No Nod....As I've always stated the AWD Verada supercharged allows a > very good chassis to reach its potential ...which happens to be a lot > higher than many others and as good as a WRX. > > If you regard a WRX as being a world beater then so be it.... > 2 or 3 Production World Rally Championships would define it as a world beater, wouldn't it? Cheers, Steve
From: OzOne on 26 May 2010 04:48 On Wed, 26 May 2010 01:29:47 -0700 (PDT), st3ph3nm <sgam(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >2 or 3 Production World Rally Championships would define it as a world >beater, wouldn't it? > >Cheers, >Steve Actually it sucks compared to the real World beater, Lancia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Rally_Championship_records Abnd as a road car the Subaru WRX is no world beater. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 26 May 2010 06:30
On Tue, 25 May 2010 19:18:00 GMT, John McKenzie <jmac_melbourne(a)bigpond.com> wrote: >More importantly, reading the advertising is the closest Oz has ever >come to driving, racing and winning in any of them. Funny how he's let >that slip without realising how obvious a 'tell' it is. Sorry no relation to any obvious tells ;{ OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. |