From: boltar2003 on
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:55:27 -0000
"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>exagerating the horsebox problem if your roads are flat as you now
>>>claim.
>>
>> I live in north london. There are plenty of steep hills around here
>
>ROFL. Living in north London you've never experienced a steep hill.

Translation: "I've never visited north london".

Why not take a trip around mill hill, hampstead, highgate or barnet then
get back to us.

>> particularly mill hill which is where I've seen a couple of these wheezing
>> piles of junk.
>
>Only a couple, and you want to force them all off the road?

I've seem others elsewhere. That was merely one example. Need some more?
There are plenty scuttling around the north downs.

B2003

From: Brimstone on


<boltar2003(a)boltar.world> wrote in message
news:hoiiat$3em$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:55:27 -0000
> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>exagerating the horsebox problem if your roads are flat as you now
>>>>claim.
>>>
>>> I live in north london. There are plenty of steep hills around here
>>
>>ROFL. Living in north London you've never experienced a steep hill.
>
> Translation: "I've never visited north london".
>
Wrong, I've lived most of my life in London travelling around most of it on
a variety of vehicle, including a push bike when I was a kid. Even the
hilliest part, north London, doesn't have any decent hills worth talking
about. If they can be cycled up they're not hills.



From: Bod on
On 26/03/2010 16:45, Brimstone wrote:
>
>
> <boltar2003(a)boltar.world> wrote in message
> news:hoiiat$3em$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:55:27 -0000
>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> exagerating the horsebox problem if your roads are flat as you now
>>>>> claim.
>>>>
>>>> I live in north london. There are plenty of steep hills around here
>>>
>>> ROFL. Living in north London you've never experienced a steep hill.
>>
>> Translation: "I've never visited north london".
>>
> Wrong, I've lived most of my life in London travelling around most of it
> on a variety of vehicle, including a push bike when I was a kid. Even
> the hilliest part, north London, doesn't have any decent hills worth
> talking about. If they can be cycled up they're not hills.
>
>
>
Ah! a new definition of what constitutes a hill.

Bod
From: Happi Monday on
--
> Dave - The Medway Handyman
> www.medwayhandyman.co.uk "
>
> Not that Handy

Yes, surprising that, as his daughter has fantastic hands. They don't
call her Handy Mandy for nothing.
From: thomas on

"Phil W Lee" <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote in message
news:2rm1r5dn77phem4nhr6vh6ho2coc2spb2u(a)4ax.com...
> It takes a considerable exercise in epidemiology to find the
> correlation between pollution levels and chronic lung conditions, and
> even having done so, it is not proven from a scientific point of view,
> because "correlation is not causation", which I believe is the point
> he is relying on to make this claim.
> Thankfully, our politicians do not seem to be waiting until the last
> link in the scientific chain of causation is established to act on
> what is clearly a problem.

Its a bid sad when petrol heads deny ALLthe facts - I think the ciggy
companies did the same in the early 1960s