From: Les Hemmings on
Steve Firth wrote:
> Les Hemmings <l.c(a)v.n> wrote:
>
>> We were taught in SAGA home & motor dept that you can't insure
>> something you don't own.
>
> Who were you taught that by, a fuckwit?
>

Could easily have been... bloody awful employers, poxy job, felt like a
battery hen on those 'phones!


From: Dr Zoidberg on

"Les Hemmings" <l.c(a)v.n> wrote in message
news:80n5n0F4shU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> Trevor wrote:
>> I have just noticed that a car I have registered in my name, is
>> insured in my wife's name - is that OK?
>
>
> We were taught in SAGA home & motor dept that you can't insure something
> you don't own.

Well , aside from that being wrong , the name on the V5 doesn't show
ownership anyway.


--
Alex

From: thomas on
exactly - registered keeper - which is what the V5 shows is different (or
can be) to the owner

Probably best to have a chat with the insurance company , they'll know the
facts rather than mere opinions here

"Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOOO!!!!!!@drzoidberg.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ho76ie$o0r$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "Les Hemmings" <l.c(a)v.n> wrote in message
> news:80n5n0F4shU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> Trevor wrote:
>>> I have just noticed that a car I have registered in my name, is
>>> insured in my wife's name - is that OK?
>>
>>
>> We were taught in SAGA home & motor dept that you can't insure something
>> you don't own.
>
> Well , aside from that being wrong , the name on the V5 doesn't show
> ownership anyway.
>
>
> --
> Alex

From: thomas on

"Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1jfq06y.1pfqkb6t5zeyoN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk...
> Les Hemmings <l.c(a)v.n> wrote:
>
>> We were taught in SAGA home & motor dept that you can't insure something
>> you
>> don't own.
>
> Who were you taught that by, a fuckwit?
>
Your views are wrong filth but it never stops you looking for the jugular -
don'y try and understand the difference between insuring risk and insuring
property 'cos its too much for your angry little brain :(

Your argument means that If you crash and dies then Its a win win situation
for me - your silence and the value of the upmarket 4X4 explorer (almost one
hundred of your earth pounds?)LOL

From: Steve Firth on
thomas <to0mmy(a)retardedloony.com> wrote:

> "Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1jfq06y.1pfqkb6t5zeyoN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk...
> > Les Hemmings <l.c(a)v.n> wrote:
> >
> >> We were taught in SAGA home & motor dept that you can't insure something
> >> you
> >> don't own.
> >
> > Who were you taught that by, a fuckwit?
> >
> Your views are wrong filth but it never stops you looking for the jugular -
> don'y try and understand the difference between insuring risk and insuring
> property 'cos its too much for your angry little brain :(

Oh look, it's Toomy having a hissy fit and claiming that someone else is
angry, again.

> Your argument means that If you crash and dies then Its a win win situation
> for me - your silence and the value of the upmarket 4X4 explorer (almost one
> hundred of your earth pounds?)LOL

Do you want a tissue so that you can clean the drool off your keyboard
Toomy?