From: Chris Bartram on 12 Apr 2010 03:22 On 12/04/2010 07:38, Doug wrote: > On 11 Apr, 23:33, Derek Geldard<im...(a)miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:53:55 -0700 (PDT), FrengaX >> >> <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: >>> On Apr 10, 8:13 am, Doug<jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >>>> Once again demonstrating the sheer destructive force of a car compared >>>> to the much maligned bicycle. >> >>> Still having to convince yourself of this, I see. Most people know >>> that cars are heavy objects, and driving them into things isn't going >>> to end happily. >> >>> Anyway, "car runs over people who are already dead" is hardly >>> newsworthy. >> >> OTOH, "car runs over people who are already dead - not many injured", >> would be slightly better. >> > How about, "The dead manage to damage a car by getting in its way and > hindering its right to pass and repass. The driver said she was > 'devastated'"? > > -- > UK Radical Campaigns > www.zing.icom43.net > A driving licence is a licence to kill. > The dead weren't in the way. Their gravestones were.
From: Brimstone on 12 Apr 2010 03:47 "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message news:8-ydnXotdsxNXl_WnZ2dnUVZ8kti4p2d(a)bt.com... > Doug wrote: >> On 11 Apr, 23:33, Derek Geldard <im...(a)miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote: >>> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:53:55 -0700 (PDT), FrengaX >>> >>> <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: >>>> On Apr 10, 8:13 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >>>>> Once again demonstrating the sheer destructive force of a car compared >>>>> to the much maligned bicycle. >>>> Still having to convince yourself of this, I see. Most people know >>>> that cars are heavy objects, and driving them into things isn't going >>>> to end happily. >>>> Anyway, "car runs over people who are already dead" is hardly >>>> newsworthy. >>> OTOH, "car runs over people who are already dead - not many injured", >>> would be slightly better. >>> >> How about, "The dead manage to damage a car by getting in its way and >> hindering its right to pass and repass. The driver said she was >> 'devastated'"? >> > No, because that would be a lie. > Since when has reimagining the facts worried Doug?
From: NM on 12 Apr 2010 05:01 On 12 Apr, 07:38, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > On 11 Apr, 23:33, Derek Geldard <im...(a)miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:53:55 -0700 (PDT), FrengaX > > > <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: > > >On Apr 10, 8:13 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > > >> Once again demonstrating the sheer destructive force of a car compared > > >> to the much maligned bicycle. > > > >Still having to convince yourself of this, I see. Most people know > > >that cars are heavy objects, and driving them into things isn't going > > >to end happily. > > > >Anyway, "car runs over people who are already dead" is hardly > > >newsworthy. > > > OTOH, "car runs over people who are already dead - not many injured", > > would be slightly better. > > How about, "The dead manage to damage a car by getting in its way and > hindering its right to pass and repass. The driver said she was > 'devastated'"? Which type of "devestated"?
From: Doug on 12 Apr 2010 05:18 On 12 Apr, 10:01, NM <nik.mor...(a)mac.com> wrote: > On 12 Apr, 07:38, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > > > > > On 11 Apr, 23:33, Derek Geldard <im...(a)miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:53:55 -0700 (PDT), FrengaX > > > > <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: > > > >On Apr 10, 8:13 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > > > >> Once again demonstrating the sheer destructive force of a car compared > > > >> to the much maligned bicycle. > > > > >Still having to convince yourself of this, I see. Most people know > > > >that cars are heavy objects, and driving them into things isn't going > > > >to end happily. > > > > >Anyway, "car runs over people who are already dead" is hardly > > > >newsworthy. > > > > OTOH, "car runs over people who are already dead - not many injured", > > > would be slightly better. > > > How about, "The dead manage to damage a car by getting in its way and > > hindering its right to pass and repass. The driver said she was > > 'devastated'"? > > Which type of "devestated"? > Well this time it seems she was sorry for the harm she had caused but usually killer drivers seem to suffer from some form of psychological damage while being physically completely unharmed, at least that is what their sympathisers here would have us believe. Lets hope the living dead don't take things the wrong way in this case, for her sake. She won't be able to sleep at night. -- UK Radical Campaigns www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill.
From: Adrian on 12 Apr 2010 05:20
Doug <jagmad(a)riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: > Lets hope the living dead don't take things the wrong way in this case, > for her sake. She won't be able to sleep at night. Sorry, did you really just suggest that zombie vigilantes might get her? Every time I think you've hit a new peak of stupidity, you burst straight through into territory previously uncharted by all but the Tooomturd. |