Car damages cemetery.
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Doug on 13 Apr 2010 02:45 On 13 Apr, 07:33, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > > >> > Lets hope the living dead don't take things the wrong way in this > >> > case, for her sake. She won't be able to sleep at night. > >> Sorry, did you really just suggest that zombie vigilantes might get > >> her? > > >> Every time I think you've hit a new peak of stupidity, you burst > >> straight through into territory previously uncharted by all but the > >> Tooomturd. > > I hadn't realised until now that you also lack a sense of humour, which > > you obviously try to compensate for with personal abuse. Have you > > considered cutting down on your driving stress? > > Ah, the old "It was a joke..." cop-out. > > Let's face it, it wouldn't be the first time (by a looooong way) you've > made threats of physical violence against person or criminal damage > against property - and you've frequently lauded those who actually carry > it out. > More of your abuse? -- UK Radical Campaigns www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill.
From: Adrian on 13 Apr 2010 02:48 Doug <jagmad(a)riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> Let's face it, it wouldn't be the first time (by a looooong way) you've >> made threats of physical violence against person or criminal damage >> against property - and you've frequently lauded those who actually >> carry it out. > More of your abuse? Abuse? No. Simple statement of fact.
From: webreader on 13 Apr 2010 02:56 On Apr 13, 7:45 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > On 13 Apr, 07:33, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > > saying: > > > >> > Lets hope the living dead don't take things the wrong way in this > > >> > case, for her sake. She won't be able to sleep at night. > > >> Sorry, did you really just suggest that zombie vigilantes might get > > >> her? > > > >> Every time I think you've hit a new peak of stupidity, you burst > > >> straight through into territory previously uncharted by all but the > > >> Tooomturd. > > > I hadn't realised until now that you also lack a sense of humour, which > > > you obviously try to compensate for with personal abuse. Have you > > > considered cutting down on your driving stress? > > > Ah, the old "It was a joke..." cop-out. > > > Let's face it, it wouldn't be the first time (by a looooong way) you've > > made threats of physical violence against person or criminal damage > > against property - and you've frequently lauded those who actually carry > > it out. > > More of your abuse? > > -- > UK Radical Campaignswww.zing.icom43.net > A driving licence is a licence to kill. Only if you consider the truth abusive. WSR
From: Brimstone on 13 Apr 2010 03:07 "Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message news:0bf39fab-06c4-43df-b904-8976d02b0c6e(a)i25g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On 13 Apr, 07:33, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were >> saying: >> >> >> > Lets hope the living dead don't take things the wrong way in this >> >> > case, for her sake. She won't be able to sleep at night. >> >> Sorry, did you really just suggest that zombie vigilantes might get >> >> her? >> >> >> Every time I think you've hit a new peak of stupidity, you burst >> >> straight through into territory previously uncharted by all but the >> >> Tooomturd. >> > I hadn't realised until now that you also lack a sense of humour, which >> > you obviously try to compensate for with personal abuse. Have you >> > considered cutting down on your driving stress? >> >> Ah, the old "It was a joke..." cop-out. >> >> Let's face it, it wouldn't be the first time (by a looooong way) you've >> made threats of physical violence against person or criminal damage >> against property - and you've frequently lauded those who actually carry >> it out. >> > More of your abuse? > Since when has a simple statement of fact been abuse?
From: loopy livernose on 13 Apr 2010 10:42
> "A woman from South Gloucestershire has said she is "devastated" by > the damage she caused at a cemetery after losing control of her car. > > Shirley Potts, who is a Labour member of South Gloucestershire > Council, was visiting Mangotsfield Cemetery on Easter Sunday to tend > her son's grave. > > She lost control of her new car and accidentally drove over the > memorials. > > Mrs Potts said she was advised not to contact the police but report it > to the council when their offices reopened. Who gave this advice? and more importantly, is it not the case that ignorance of the law is no excuse.. if "vandalism" is criminal damage, then it was criminally negligent NOT to report an accident in the circumstances above. > After laying flowers on her son's grave, Mrs Potts, who had owned the > vehicle for a month, was trying to leave when her foot slipped and > caught on the accelerator. hmm, foot slipped and caught on the accellerator? sounds very far fetched to me? unless she was wearing unsuitable attire, heels maybe? > "It all happened so fast, the car just shot forward," she said..." anyone know if it was an auto.. of course, the car "shooting" forwards now means Hyundai need to recall all their dangerous cars... (sic) > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/8610549.stm > bit of a non story there.. not enough info to really get to grips, but why drive a car into a grave yard? I don't see the need? only times I have ever seen cars (local to me) in a grave yard is during a funeral! maybe South Gloucestershire has much bigger grave yards?? |