Children are fighting back!
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: For all those Facebookers who don't like England Flags on cars..
Next: Yet another pavement killing, by police this time.
From: Tony Dragon on 6 Jun 2010 15:13 Trevor wrote: > On Jun 5, 6:12�am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >> Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous drivers. >> >> "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window > > If you feel the need to complain about the content of this post, > please do so to: > > Doug Bollen, 119a Culverley Road, Catford, London SE6 2JZ. > > If you post it, please ensure you include a turd in the package. If > you deliver by hand, wrapping the message round a brick works quite > well. I think you will find that that is the address of the other Doug. -- Tony Dragon
From: The Medway Handyman on 6 Jun 2010 19:37 Tony Dragon wrote: > Trevor wrote: >> On Jun 5, 6:12?am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >>> Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous >>> drivers. "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window >> >> If you feel the need to complain about the content of this post, >> please do so to: >> >> Doug Bollen, 119a Culverley Road, Catford, London SE6 2JZ. >> >> If you post it, please ensure you include a turd in the package. If >> you deliver by hand, wrapping the message round a brick works quite >> well. > > I think you will find that that is the address of the other Doug. I'd really like to know the correct addres - then I could report his illegal use of an electric bike. -- Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.
From: Derek Geldard on 6 Jun 2010 20:03 On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 11:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Trevor <trevorharryroberts(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 5, 6:12?am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >> Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous drivers. >> >> "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window > >If you feel the need to complain about the content of this post, >please do so to: > >Doug Bollen, 119a Culverley Road, Catford, London SE6 2JZ. > >If you post it, please ensure you include a turd in the package. Turds don't grow on trees you know. Derek
From: Mark on 7 Jun 2010 01:19 "Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message news:f1b97043-e847-495d-882c-fccfd6d95567(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com... > Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous drivers. > > "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window > > A driver had a "lucky escape" after her windscreen was shattered by > children who threw a rock at her car. > > The motorist was driving along Robertson Way in Shrewsbury at 1235 BST > on Thursday when she spotted three children hiding in bushes. > > Moments later she spotted one throwing a stone at her car, which > shattered the windscreen, say West Mercia Police. Doug, how did these children know if she was a dangerous driver, or just a normal person going about their buisness. Did the children check somehow? Why do you appear to condone a random act of violence against a random person just for driving a car, but a week ago on uk.legal you were condeming the police for stopping motorists, which resulted in ten unsafe cars/drivers being taken off the road? Is this not hypocritical?
From: Doug on 7 Jun 2010 02:25
On 6 June, 08:50, Tony Dragon <tony.dra...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > Doug wrote: > > On 5 June, 23:04, "jamesd1974" <easyh...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: > >> "Doug" <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote in message > > >>news:f1b97043-e847-495d-882c-fccfd6d95567(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com.... > > >>> Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous drivers.. > >>> "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window > >>> A driver had a "lucky escape" after her windscreen was shattered by > >>> children who threw a rock at her car. > >>> The motorist was driving along Robertson Way in Shrewsbury at 1235 BST > >>> on Thursday when she spotted three children hiding in bushes. > >>> Moments later she spotted one throwing a stone at her car, which > >>> shattered the windscreen, say West Mercia Police. > >>> The driver was able to stop safely. A force spokesman said: "This was > >>> an extremely foolish and dangerous act." > >> if she had been blinded by broken glass and then inadvertently hit and > >> killed a cyclist would the death have been her fault?, and if so, how? > > >> james ( I know what your answer is going to be, I'm just wondering how > >> you're going to twist it so she would be to blame) > > > You are surely not trying to blame the vulnerable victim for their own > > death, as usual? > > > Let me see. > > > Likely scenario... > > > Windscreen gets broken and driver continues to proceed in a straight > > line while cautiously applying her brakes and hits a cyclist who > > wrongly gets in her way. Obviously the driver cannot be at fault > > because children broke her windscreen thus absolving her from all > > blame The fact that she is in sole charge of a dangerous machine, aka > > 'weapon', in a public place is of no consequence. Probably because > > millions of others are in a similar position and this is a democracy, > > where majority mob rule must, by definition, prevail regardless of any > > ethical considerations. > > > Well we know from what you have said before, that if she had lost > control of her vehicle it would not be her fault as she had been attacked.. > > Therefore you have just accepted that as she was attacked she would not > be to blame. > How clever of you to understand what has been written above. Yes indeed, I was merely illustrating why a hypothetical cyclist should not be blamed as a way of absolving a driver from possible blame. > > -- > > UK Radical Campaigns. > > http://www.zing.icom43.net > > One man's democracy is another man's Aristotlean mob. |