From: George W Frost on

"Albm&ctd" <alb_mandctdNOWMD(a)connexus.net.au> wrote in message
news:MPG.263a6c7d43b6a06f989b60(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> In article <zhyzn.20502$pv.13218(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
> georgewfrost(a)gmail.com says...
>> Yes, I reverse small and large trailers using both flat and convex
>> mirrors
>> and it makes no difference at all.
>>
> You crash into things with both types?
>
> Al
> --
> I don't take sides.
> It's more fun to insult everyone.
> http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html

Sure, I don't discriminate


From: George W Frost on

"Albm&ctd" <alb_mandctdNOWMD(a)connexus.net.au> wrote in message
news:MPG.263a6bdb4dc86625989b5f(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> In article <4BCE9771.6070609(a)yahoo.com>, pjetson(a)yahoo.com says...
>> My wife's 2006 Honda Jazz has a convex driver's side mirror. I'm
>> looking for someone to supply a replacement flat mirror in Melbourne -
>> does anyone have any ideas on who I can call?
>>
>> While I was googling to try to find a supplier, I came across what seems
>> to be the current ADR for rear vision mirrors:
>>
>> <http://www.fedlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/LegislativeInstrumentCompilation1.nsf/0/88A97BFF3124ECEDCA257257007D18BC/$file/ADR1401comp1FINALFRLI.pdf>
>>
>> The ADR says that the external driver's side mirror must be flat. How
>> then have Honda been able to sell this car with a convex mirror?
>>
>> Peter
>>
> Same way they got the CRV rear lights passed, I guess.
>
> Al
> --
> I don't take sides.
> It's more fun to insult everyone.
> http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html

While you are talking about lights
How come, when I looked at replacing my taillights with those Altezza?
lights on my BA coon car
The roadworthy place told me that they would not pass them for a roadworthy
Yet, the Prius has got the same style of taillight, with the silvery looking
plastic cover instead of the red lens


From: Pete on
hippo wrote:

> I suppose it's silly to ask if you've checked whether Honda Spares carry a
> flat replacement as a stock item?

Yes, I've checked, and no, Honda don't make a flat mirror.

Peter
From: D Walford on
On 21/04/2010 9:40 PM, Atheist Chaplain wrote:
> "D Walford" <dwalford(a)internode.on.net> wrote in message
> news:4bce9d5d$0$8753$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>> On 21/04/2010 4:13 PM, Pete wrote:
>>> My wife's 2006 Honda Jazz has a convex driver's side mirror. I'm
>>> looking for someone to supply a replacement flat mirror in Melbourne -
>>> does anyone have any ideas on who I can call?
>>>
>>> While I was googling to try to find a supplier, I came across what seems
>>> to be the current ADR for rear vision mirrors:
>>>
>>> <http://www.fedlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/LegislativeInstrumentCompilation1.nsf/0/88A97BFF3124ECEDCA257257007D18BC/$file/ADR1401comp1FINALFRLI.pdf>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The ADR says that the external driver's side mirror must be flat. How
>>> then have Honda been able to sell this car with a convex mirror?
>>>
>> Good question, my 09 Hilux has a convex drivers side mirror and I
>> don't like it.
>> Not 100% sure about my wife's new Forester but I think it also has a
>> convex drivers side external mirror.
>>
>>
>> Daryl
>
> now that would be an interesting argument, refusing delivery of your car
> from the dealer because the convex drivers side mirror does not meet
> Australian ADR's :-)
> I wonder how that would go down with the dealer.............
>
Like a lead brick:-)


Daryl
From: D Walford on
On 21/04/2010 10:40 PM, George W Frost wrote:
> "Someone Else"<bogusname(a)smallpond.com> wrote in message
> news:4bced028$0$24251$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "Pete"<pjetson(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:4BCE9771.6070609(a)yahoo.com...
>>> My wife's 2006 Honda Jazz has a convex driver's side mirror. I'm looking
>>> for someone to supply a replacement flat mirror in Melbourne - does
>>> anyone have any ideas on who I can call?
>>>
>>> While I was googling to try to find a supplier, I came across what seems
>>> to be the current ADR for rear vision mirrors:
>>>
>>> <http://www.fedlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/LegislativeInstrumentCompilation1.nsf/0/88A97BFF3124ECEDCA257257007D18BC/$file/ADR1401comp1FINALFRLI.pdf>
>>>
>>> The ADR says that the external driver's side mirror must be flat. How
>>> then have Honda been able to sell this car with a convex mirror?
>>>
>>> Peter
>>
>> That ADR reference is out of date. Get your hands on ADR 14/02. Key
>> words: "The reflecting surface of a mirror must be either flat or
>> spherically convex. Exterior mirrors may be equipped with an additional
>> aspherical part provided that the main mirror fulfils the requirements of
>> the indirect field of vision."
>>
>> I test drove a new Golf today - it has a convex external mirror - quite
>> annoying when you've been used to a flattie for decades...
>>
>
> I have those smaller convex mirrors stuck onto my original mirrors and work
> with them all the time
>
>
That's fine if you have both but when you haven't got any flat mirror to
judge distance with it makes it so much more difficult.
The DAF I used to drive had a huge flat mirror plus a large convex
mirror on both sides (all power adjustable and heated) which made rear
visibility excellent in all conditions.


Daryl


Daryl