From: Catman on
Adrian wrote:
> Silk <me(a)privacy.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying:
>
>>>>> your sock puppet, Steve H
>
>>>> I doubt that, y'know.
>
>>> He's been suffering from that delusion for quite a long time now.
>>>
>>> Most amusing when you consider that a UKRMer knows Steve F and that I
>>> met up with him for lunch the day I collected my Ducati.
>
>> We only have your word for that.
>
> <shrug> Fine.
>
> I've not met Steve F, but I do know people who have - and their
> descriptions of him certainly don't match Steve H, who I have met several
> times.

The real question is: Have you met Katie :)

--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS 156 V6 2.5 S2
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
From: Catman on
SteveH wrote:
> Mike P <privacy(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>
>>> is also one of my other personalities, feel free to ask him. He's
>>> usually kicking around in one of the car groups. He's one of the lucky
>>> few who have met both of us in person and is the only one who has met us
>>> both in the same place at the same time.
>> And he says you are both quite normal human beings..
>
> I suspect he's not the best judge of character.

I'd have to agree with that, and I've only met one of you :)

--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS 156 V6 2.5 S2
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
From: Catman on
SteveH wrote:
> Mike P <privacy(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>
>>> is also one of my other personalities, feel free to ask him. He's
>>> usually kicking around in one of the car groups. He's one of the lucky
>>> few who have met both of us in person and is the only one who has met us
>>> both in the same place at the same time.
>> And he says you are both quite normal human beings..
>
> I suspect he's not the best judge of character.

I'd have to agree with that, and I've only met one of you :)

--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS 156 V6 2.5 S2
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
From: Conor on
In article <hee35f$rt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Krusty says...

> As an (ex) HGV driver, can you answer the original question? If you
> didn't see it, the gist was why do the vast majority of HGV drivers
> never use full beam at night, thus making it much harder for the
> cars/bikes stuck behind them to overtake as they can't see when there's
> a straight bit of road ahead?
>
Because they don't go fast enough to need it, are on roads they know.
There's something else which I would like to explain but have trouble
articulating. Its kind of like an ability to see better at night because
you do so much of it.

> I'd guess that being professional drivers they know they're making it
> harder for people,

No.

> so is it just that they like keeping everyone behind
> them, or are they just too lazy to flick between full & dip? It is a
> serious question btw.

They have no need to put full beam on. Its not being lazy or doing it to
be annoying - its just that they don't feel the need to.

As for not apparently being able to overtake at night unless the driver
in front uses full and dipped beam, I would suggest the deficiency lies
with the person wanting to do the overtaking - I've never found it an
issue as a car driver.

--
Conor
www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Conor on
In article <mn.bc227d9b5b080add.106911(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk>, Harry
Bloomfield says...
>
> Conor explained on 23/11/2009 :
> > If the HGV test is so easy, how come so many car drivers fail it?
>
> Not very many car drivers will actually take it, most will already be
> gainfully employed.

What bearing does that have on anything?

--
Conor
www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk

I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.