Cunting lorry drivers.
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Andy Bonwick on 26 Nov 2009 02:28 On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:32:58 -0800 (PST), NM <nik.morgan(a)mac.com> wrote: snip> >But as all lory drivers are thick why are you surprised when he fails >to illuminate the road for you, maybe it's you being thick by assuming >he will. I've kept out of the main beam discussion because I honestly don't expect anything decent from a lorry driver. I'm having a very wild guess here but I suspect that on any given day in the UK the percentage of drivers unable to speak English is higher than the percentage unable to speak English working in any other industry. They're not used to people wanting to have the road lit up for them before they overtake, they're used to cars just pulling out and going for it regardless of any hazards in the way. You've also got to remember that plenty of these retards don't waste their time looking in their mirrors as often as we'd all like them to so if you're waiting to overtake you need to make sure your main beam is clearly visible to the driver.
From: Silk on 26 Nov 2009 03:54 On 26/11/2009 07:17, The Older Gentleman wrote: > <snip> > > General observation: why is privacy.net the last refuge of complete > tossers? Think Spacker on upce. Having a go at the method one uses to post on Usenet is the last refuge of the loser of the argument.
From: Silk on 26 Nov 2009 03:55 On 25/11/2009 23:09, Champ wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:05:02 +0000, Silk<me(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >> On 25/11/2009 22:58, Champ wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:24:52 +0000, Silk<me(a)privacy.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Bikers are simply a different breed and, apart from sharing the same >>>> roads, have almost nothing in common with car drivers. >>> >>> The vast majority of bikers are also car drivers, you twonk. > >> You don't get it. Hardly surprising really. > > Ah, the "superiour smug" response - a usenet favourite. Well done. I'll leave the "superior smug" to those who are best at it, namely bikers.
From: Silk on 26 Nov 2009 03:57 On 26/11/2009 07:39, boots wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:31:52 -0700 in uk.rec.motorcycles, > vulgarandmischevious says: > >> Can we just skip a few steps and go straight to death threats? This >> thread is a bit boring now. > > Lets be fair, you're not likely to get an intellectual argument from > Conor et al Is that like a Morris et al?
From: Malc on 26 Nov 2009 03:58
Harry Bloomfield wrote: > > Bring back the Romans :-) Hah! What did the Romans ever do for us? -- Malc |