Cyclists above the law
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Cunting lorry drivers.
Next: Britain's scariest roads
From: The Medway Handyman on 3 Dec 2009 19:27 Adrian wrote: > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> gurgled > happily, sounding much like they were saying: > >>>> I find it hilarious that David Lang, the Medway Handyman (http:// >>>> www.medwayhandyman.co.uk/) thinks that he's actually doing anything >>>> positive by advertising his business in this manner. > >>> Not only that, he makes remarks which are hateful and thoroughly >>> offensive and publishes his home address in the public domain. > >> Can't win the argument, attack the person instead. > > Which of those statements is a personal attack? "hateful and thoroughly offensive" The truth hurts. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk
From: The Medway Handyman on 3 Dec 2009 19:29 Adrian wrote: > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> gurgled > happily, sounding much like they were saying: > >>> I find it hilarious that David Lang, the Medway Handyman (http:// >>> www.medwayhandyman.co.uk/) thinks that he's actually doing anything >>> positive by advertising his business in this manner. > >> I'm not advertising my business. >> -- >> Dave - The Medway Handyman >> www.medwayhandyman.co.uk > > Of course not. If it offends you. I'll change it. Dave - the Tax Paying Motorist.
From: The Medway Handyman on 3 Dec 2009 19:31 mileburner wrote: > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in > message news:%WTRm.11468$Ym4.2662(a)text.news.virginmedia.com... >> mileburner wrote: >>> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >>> message news:SIDRm.11223$Ym4.7974(a)text.news.virginmedia.com... >>>> Squashme wrote: >>>>> On 2 Dec, 16:28, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >>>>>> mileburner <milebur...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Why is it the cyclists who seem to have a complete inability to >>>>>>>> correctly apportion blame? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Possibly because cyclists tend to see safety as more important >>>>>>> than blame. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, cyclists see whining on about safety as important. However >>>>>> they don't have a clue about safety. Otherwise they would not >>>>>> ignore red lights, place their safety above that of pedestrians, >>>>>> and cycle down the blind sides of large vehicles. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll take your pronouncements about safety seriously the day that >>>>>> cyclists place safety above their own convenience. >>>>> >>>>> I certainly find being dead rather inconvenient. >>>> >>>> The only good cyclist is a dead cyclist. >>> >>> That comment certainly highlights the problems that cyclists face on >>> the roads. >> >> Then they should keep off them. > > So that The Medway Handyman can selfishly use the roads as he sees > fit, because he has paid a few hundred quid in tax? Yup, thats exactly it. > I don't think so Sonny... You don't think at all. -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
From: Ray Keattch on 4 Dec 2009 03:41 The Medway Handyman wrote: > mileburner wrote: >> "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in >> message news:wjTRm.11448$Ym4.6010(a)text.news.virginmedia.com... >>> That presupposes that motorists are stupid enough to want to cycle. Why >>> on earth would any sane person want to do so? >> Health, fitness, cost, respect for other who want to breath clean >> air, or just for plain enjoyment. I am sure there are plenty of other >> reasons too. > > I'm sure there aren't. Not to anyone normal. > > Health & fitness? Inhaling all those exhaust fumes? Where did this concern for others inhaling fumes come from? -- MrBitsy
From: Ray Keattch on 4 Dec 2009 03:45
The Medway Handyman wrote: > soup wrote: >> The Medway Handyman wrote: >> >>> You cannot use a vehicle on the road wothout a tax disc, therefore >>> you pay to use the road. >>> What part don't you understand. >> Logic obviously isn't your strong point. Nowhere does that say VED is >> used to pay for the road. I can use the road tomorrow for nothing >> (roads are free to use) it is the vehicle license to use the road >> that costs not the road. > > Logic isn't my strong point? No. > Something I've noticed about you bike riding tossers, you all have this idea > that you somehow pay for using the roads, when you don't. > > Do you have a tax disc for your push bike? No you don't. Therefore you are > a sponging freeloader. Simple isn't it? It is very odd that you don't mind smokers blowing their filth around in public, but you have a problem with cyclists using the roads. Very odd. -- MrBitsy |