Cyclists above the law
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Cunting lorry drivers.
Next: Britain's scariest roads
From: Adrian on 4 Dec 2009 05:46 "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: > Oh No! > > I can feel it coming... > > Cyclists don't have drivers licences either! > > <checks wallet for licence> > > Oh yes they do :-) Have you ever been beaten to death with your wallet?
From: Peter Grange on 4 Dec 2009 05:57 On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:36:21 -0000, "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > >"The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message >news:_j5Sm.11691$Ym4.8425(a)text.news.virginmedia.com... > >> Good job I have a clean licence then isn't it? >> >> Oh sorry, you wouldn't understand 'licence' would you, not needing one to >> be a freeloading unregulated cyclist. > >Oh No! > >I can feel it coming... > >Cyclists don't have drivers licences either! > ><checks wallet for licence> > >Oh yes they do :-) > Oh dear, here we go round the mulberry bush :-) -- Pete - The Tax Paying Driving Licence Owning Cyclist
From: Steve Firth on 4 Dec 2009 07:02 Peter Grange <peter(a)plgrange.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > Would probably lower the blood pressure actually. Cycling's good for > that :-) How odd then that the twats who post to urc and urcm act as if they are permanently on the edge of bursting a blood vessel.
From: Peter Grange on 4 Dec 2009 08:36 On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:02:17 +0000, %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: >Peter Grange <peter(a)plgrange.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >> >> Would probably lower the blood pressure actually. Cycling's good for >> that :-) > >How odd then that the twats who post to urc and urcm act as if they are >permanently on the edge of bursting a blood vessel. Speak for yourself mate, and don't generalise. -- Pete
From: Keitht on 4 Dec 2009 08:41
The Medway Handyman wrote: > dan(a)telent.net wrote: >> Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I sometimes wear a hat. Am I a hat-wearer? <checks reflection> No, I >>> am not. Does whether I wear a hat or not affect whether I pay VED? >>> No, it does not. >> And again, I sometimes drive a car. At present, I am not driving a >> car. Last time I paid VED I was not driving a car. It seems that >> paying VED and driving cars are no more closely linked than paying VED >> and wearing hats. > > FFS. If you want to drive a car on the road you have to have a tax disc - > simple. > > Quite a few people want to drive on the roads and do so without tax discs - it's that simple. That it may be illegal doesn't appear to be any deterrent. Some seem to have valid discs but they have been either altered or forged. They don't have any problems about driving on the roads. -- Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle |