Cyclists above the law
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Cunting lorry drivers.
Next: Britain's scariest roads
From: The Medway Handyman on 4 Dec 2009 15:56 mileburner wrote: > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in > message news:OedSm.11840$Ym4.3829(a)text.news.virginmedia.com... >> Peter Grange wrote: >>> >>> Good to be able to choose like that in a recession. Got any work >>> today? >> >> Yes thanks. And booked solid for the next two weeks, four people to >> call tonight to book in more work, seven messages on the answerphone >> from customers, two qoutes to do and I'm out on Saturday to try & >> catch up. > > Hopefully that will keep nutjob away from his computer for a while. You must be going skint by that standard. No arguments left than? -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
From: mileburner on 4 Dec 2009 16:01 "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:6idSm.11847$Ym4.9587(a)text.news.virginmedia.com... > mileburner wrote: >>The same people will undoubtedly be declaring >> their vehicle cost (including VED) as a bona fide business expense >> and evading tax even further. > > It is a bona fide business expense. Its not evading tax at all. Not when you are taking cash and putting it in your back pocket without declaring it and then claiming your running costs as a business expense. The bizarre thing is that you complain about cyclists not paying the tax which they are not required to pay, but at the same time you are fiddling your own tax and stealing the money you owe. Not only are you avoiding the tax you are required to pay, you are stealing money which is not yours. You really are a hypocrite and a dispicable theif. Why should my tax subsidise scum like you?
From: spam-spam-spam on 4 Dec 2009 18:22 On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:12:27 GMT "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > I've just e mailed btinternet to request your name & address. How are you going to prove that the person who posted as mileburner is the owner of the BT email address?
From: The Medway Handyman on 4 Dec 2009 18:26 spam-spam-spam(a)ntlworld.com wrote: > On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:12:27 GMT > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > >> I've just e mailed btinternet to request your name & address. > > How are you going to prove that the person who posted as mileburner is > the owner of the BT email address? TBH I don't know, but I know people who can find out. For a start I'll have his bt account suspended. He appears well known on radical cycling groups, shouldn't be hard to track him down. -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
From: spam-spam-spam on 4 Dec 2009 18:31
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:26:16 GMT "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > spam-spam-spam(a)ntlworld.com wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:12:27 GMT > > "The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> I've just e mailed btinternet to request your name & address. > > > > How are you going to prove that the person who posted as mileburner > > is the owner of the BT email address? > > TBH I don't know, but I know people who can find out. For a start > I'll have his bt account suspended. He appears well known on radical > cycling groups, shouldn't be hard to track him down. > You have absolutely no proof that the account associated with that address has anything to do with the person who posted, but you still intend to have it suspended? |