Cyclists above the law
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Cunting lorry drivers.
Next: Britain's scariest roads
From: MasonS on 6 Dec 2009 11:42 On 6 Dec, 16:32, "The Medway Handyman" <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > Mas...(a)BP.com wrote: > > On 6 Dec, 13:22, Conor <co...(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote: > >> In article <9794ca9a-552a-4520-a03e-618921e70364 > >> @x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>, Mas...(a)BP.com says... > > >>> Don't car drivers have to eat as well? > > >> Not to replace energy used to transport themselves. > > >>> Stop clutching at straws. > > >> You should. > > >> -- > >> Conorwww.notebooks-r-us.co.uk > > >> I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally. > > > I eat about 2500 calories a day and am around 12 stone. A lot of my > > fat car driving workmates eat *far* more than I do to maintain their > > 18 stone plus weight. This bulk, plus their 1.5 tonne cars needs a lot > > of fossil fuel energy to shift on top of their carbon footprint caused > > by all of the lorries shifting their pies and sausage rolls up and > > down the land. > > So your pro biotic yoghurt & muesli transport themselves do they? > > -- > Dave - The Medway Handymanwww.medwayhandyman.co.uk- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Sadly for your blinkered stereotype, I'm more likely to eat fillet steak than muesli. -- Simon Mason
From: The Medway Handyman on 6 Dec 2009 12:29 MasonS(a)BP.com wrote: > On 6 Dec, 16:32, "The Medway Handyman" > <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >> Mas...(a)BP.com wrote: >>> On 6 Dec, 13:22, Conor <co...(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote: >>>> In article <9794ca9a-552a-4520-a03e-618921e70364 >>>> @x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>, Mas...(a)BP.com says... >> >>>>> Don't car drivers have to eat as well? >> >>>> Not to replace energy used to transport themselves. >> >>>>> Stop clutching at straws. >> >>>> You should. >> >>>> -- >>>> Conorwww.notebooks-r-us.co.uk >> >>>> I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally. >> >>> I eat about 2500 calories a day and am around 12 stone. A lot of my >>> fat car driving workmates eat *far* more than I do to maintain their >>> 18 stone plus weight. This bulk, plus their 1.5 tonne cars needs a >>> lot of fossil fuel energy to shift on top of their carbon footprint >>> caused by all of the lorries shifting their pies and sausage rolls >>> up and down the land. >> >> So your pro biotic yoghurt & muesli transport themselves do they? >> >> -- >> Dave - The Medway Handymanwww.medwayhandyman.co.uk- Hide quoted text >> - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Sadly for your blinkered stereotype, I'm more likely to eat fillet > steak than muesli. So how is that delivered then? In the same lorry as the pies and sausage rolls? -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
From: Ian Dalziel on 6 Dec 2009 12:34 On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 08:37:43 -0800 (PST), "MasonS(a)BP.com" <MasonS(a)BP.com> wrote: >On 6 Dec, 16:26, Phil W Lee <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote: >> "Mas...(a)BP.com" <Mas...(a)BP.com> considered Sun, 6 Dec 2009 04:33:34 >> -0800 (PST) the perfect time to write: > >> >> >�5 a gallon is about �1-10 a litre. I just bought some 95% water >> >called beer and it cost me �3 a litre. >> >Petrol is dirt cheap considering its journey to your tank. >> >> Which proves that if you derive your cycling calories from beer, you >> may well be paying more duty that the motorist.- Hide quoted text - > >I have probably paid for the M25 on my own then! >Pauwel Kwak was �6.50 a litre in Waitrose and 97 RON only �1.20 a >litre earlier on today. Tastes much nicer, though - trust me on this. -- Ian D
From: Steve Firth on 6 Dec 2009 12:34 MasonS(a)BP.com <MasonS(a)BP.com> wrote: > Sadly for your blinkered stereotype, I'm more likely to eat fillet > steak than muesli. Makes a note, Simon knows nothing about steak.
From: Adrian on 6 Dec 2009 12:45
johnwright <""john\"@no spam here.com"> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> Considering man made CO2 has absolutely no effect on climate change at >> all, why does it matter? > You have some proof of that - real proof I mean not some illegally > hacked out of context emails from UEA[1]? I'd love to know what possible context deleting information rather than reveal it in response to an FoI request would be acceptable. As for the legality - umm, does the method of revelation (assuming it wasn't an internal whistle-blower) somehow invalidate the information revealed? |