Cyclists above the law
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Cunting lorry drivers.
Next: Britain's scariest roads
From: Steve Firth on 10 Dec 2009 03:42 MasonS(a)BP.com <MasonS(a)BP.com> wrote: > On 7 Dec, 21:19, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > > > > > > > Still good to see you hypocritically resorting to ad hominem. Makes a > > > > change from tu quoque, I suppose. > > > > > Did you have some particularly good bottles last night? > > > > And more ad hominem, it just comes naturally to you, doesn't it? > > You mean when you mock someone "someone"? > for driving an Alfa, drinking poncy beer and wearing different clothes to > you, this is somehow not Ad Hominem? How strange it only works one way. Is the beer a person? Is the car a person?
From: MasonS on 10 Dec 2009 03:53 On 10 Dec, 08:42, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > Mas...(a)BP.com <Mas...(a)BP.com> wrote: > > On 7 Dec, 21:19, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > > > > > > Still good to see you hypocritically resorting to ad hominem. Makes a > > > > > change from tu quoque, I suppose. > > > > > Did you have some particularly good bottles last night? > > > > And more ad hominem, it just comes naturally to you, doesn't it? > > > You mean when you mock someone > > "someone"? > > > for driving an Alfa, drinking poncy beer and wearing different clothes to > > you, this is somehow not Ad Hominem? How strange it only works one way. > > Is the beer a person? Is the car a person? Nice try, but we both know who you were attacking and why. "Look at that silly man chaps, he drives an Alfa - let's all laugh at him." "Oh and he wears silly tights as well, all the better." "Look at that poncy drink he bought. Puff." Big man in the pub with his mates syndrome. Short on logic, big on insults as a poor substitute. -- Simon Mason
From: The Medway Handyman on 10 Dec 2009 03:53 MasonS(a)BP.com wrote: > On 7 Dec, 21:19, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > >> >>>> Still good to see you hypocritically resorting to ad hominem. >>>> Makes a change from tu quoque, I suppose. >> >>> Did you have some particularly good bottles last night? >> >> And more ad hominem, it just comes naturally to you, doesn't it? > > You mean when you mock someone for driving an Alfa, drinking poncy > beer and wearing different clothes to you, this is somehow not Ad > Hominem? How strange it only works one way. Scuse me, that wasn't Mr Firth, it was me. It's not ad hominem. I just think you are a pretentious prat. -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
From: MasonS on 10 Dec 2009 03:57 On 10 Dec, 08:53, "The Medway Handyman" <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > Mas...(a)BP.com wrote: > > On 7 Dec, 21:19, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > > >>>> Still good to see you hypocritically resorting to ad hominem. > >>>> Makes a change from tu quoque, I suppose. > > >>> Did you have some particularly good bottles last night? > > >> And more ad hominem, it just comes naturally to you, doesn't it? > > > You mean when you mock someone for driving an Alfa, drinking poncy > > beer and wearing different clothes to you, this is somehow not Ad > > Hominem? How strange it only works one way. > > Scuse me, that wasn't Mr Firth, it was me. It's not ad hominem. I just > think you are a pretentious prat. > > -- > Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist I stand corrected, he just laughed at my car and clothes then, my apologies. -- Simon Mason
From: mileburner on 10 Dec 2009 05:21
MasonS(a)BP.com wrote: > I stand corrected, he just laughed at my car and clothes then, my > apologies. It is better to be laughed at for you car and clothes, than to be laughed at for your lack of ability to comprehend the tax system, your hypocrisy, you poor attitude to other road users and your vile postings. |