Cyclists above the law
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Cunting lorry drivers.
Next: Britain's scariest roads
From: The Medway Handyman on 21 Dec 2009 14:33 Conor wrote: > In article <6fa61301-830a-4334-a526-eed018885134 > @l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, MasonS(a)BP.com says... > >> That's why our site is building a world scale biodiesel plant - got >> to keep you going when the oil runs out. > > And I wonder how the materials and equipment to build the plant > arrive.... Dead simple mate. I've learned a few things from these lycra loons. Cycling is 'the' most effcient form of transort after all. And they have claimed you can run a business from a bike. So, instead of using containers, use push bikes instead. I've worked it out. A container holds 30,000 kilos. Now we don't want to overload the buggers, so 20kg each, thats 1500 cyclists. Now, say we want to do London to Leeds, thats 200 miles @20mph - it would only take them 10 hours each. So 1500 cyclists @ 10 hours, thats 15,000 man hours on minimum wage, only �87K. Thats got to be much cheaper than a lorry. -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
From: The Medway Handyman on 21 Dec 2009 14:33 MasonS(a)BP.com wrote: > On 20 Dec, 01:12, "The Medway Handyman" > <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >> Conor wrote: >>> In article <6fa61301-830a-4334-a526-eed018885134 >>> @l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, Mas...(a)BP.com says... >> >>>> That's why our site is building a world scale biodiesel plant - got >>>> to keep you going when the oil runs out. >> >>> And I wonder how the materials and equipment to build the plant >>> arrive.... >> >> They will be delivered by byclcle of course... >> >> -- >> Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist > > Ship and train mostly. Don't forget the horse &cart. -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
From: The Medway Handyman on 21 Dec 2009 14:36 MasonS(a)BP.com wrote: > On 20 Dec, 01:18, "The Medway Handyman" > <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >> Phil W Lee wrote: >>> "The Medway Handjob" <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> considered >>> Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:04:36 GMT the perfect time to write: >> >>>> I like people to see I'm a clueless idiot with an attitude problem, >>>> and I'm not going to let anyone stop me proving it. >> >>> Or words to that effect. >> >> Typical pathetic cyclist attempt to have a go. >> >> I didn't actually say that did I fuckwit? >> >> -- >> Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist > > Do you have a truce on cyclist hunting on Xmas Day? Of course, all the little kids on their new bikes.... -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
From: The Medway Handyman on 21 Dec 2009 14:38 MasonS(a)BP.com wrote: > On 21 Dec, 18:54, "The Medway Handyman" > <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > >> >> It all makes perfect sense, but you just can't stand the thought that >> cyclists should be regulated like other users of vehicles on the >> road and that they might have to pay for using them. > > Reality check. > > They will never be "regulated", as you call it, because they rarely > cause harm to anyone, quite the opposite. > > Get over it for your own health's sake, you are wasting your time > ranting on here. But I'm not out taking photos to prove a point. Ha ha ha ha! -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist
From: The Medway Handyman on 21 Dec 2009 14:39
MasonS(a)BP.com wrote: > On 21 Dec, 19:02, "The Medway Handyman" > <davidl...(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > >> Oh FFS. How on earth can reduction in house prices be blamed on >> motorists. Absolute proof the figures are made up bollox. > > Try selling your house when someone has built a big new by-pass next > to it, then come back and say that. > Quiet secluded locations always attract a premium. As do 'close to motorway & road links'. This is commuter land, easy access to motorways adds a premium. -- Dave - The Tax Paying Motorist |