Prev: Cunting lorry drivers.
Next: Britain's scariest roads
From: Conor on 1 Dec 2009 05:39 In article <thq9h59v48poocktlfvm2objdp7orclqs3(a)4ax.com>, Peter Grange says... = > More bollocks. So what direct costs do you pay to maintain the roads, bearing in mind that taxation on motor vehicles is eight times the road maintenance and buiding budget? -- Conor www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Steve Firth on 1 Dec 2009 05:28 Keitht <KeithT> wrote: > Idiot. Keep the sig.
From: Steve Firth on 1 Dec 2009 05:28 Keitht <KeithT> wrote: > Steve Firth wrote: > > Peter Grange <peter(a)plgrange.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > > >>> See previous comment about "tu quoque" it really does draw you like a > >>> moth to a candle, doesn't it? > >> I repeat, I didn't attempt to justify either of them being there, and > >> never have. > > > > Still struggling with that "tu quoque" business I see. > > Still using that false legal bollocks I see. It's nothing to do with "false legal bollocks". But thanks for the demonstration of the extent of your ignorance. > "Oooh, it's in Latin, it must be important" I like it when thick people pretend something isn't apposite based purely on the depths of their ignorance.
From: Steve Firth on 1 Dec 2009 05:32 Huge <Huge(a)nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > "cyclists are a bandit tribe who blithely ignore the usual laws of the road"; "riding a bike has to stop being a lawless occupation" > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/article6936082.ece (ibid.)
From: Conor on 1 Dec 2009 05:44
In article <hf2fic$col$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, mileburner says... > Although on the local housing estate where plenty of the residents are > unemployed and live on benefits and do not pay council tax, they still > manage to run untaxed cars on the road. How do you know they're unemployed? Are you basing it solely on the virtue that they live on a council estate? -- Conor www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally. |