From: dan on
Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> writes:

> Peter Grange <peter(a)plgrange.demon.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much
> like they were saying:
>> I am a motorist and a cyclist.
>
> Yes, you are. At different times. As am I. I am also a pedestrian. But
> not at the same time as being either a cyclist or a motorist.
[...]
> But you do not pay VED as a cyclist, and you do not pay VED as a
> pedestrian. You pay VED as the keeper of a vehicle - a subset of
> "motorist".

This argument is logically inconsistent. If I am only a cyclist when
cycling and only a motorist when motoring, and only a pedestrian when
walking, yet I am the keeper of a vehicle *all the time* (it still needs
VED even when I'm not using it, if it is parked on the public road),
keepers of vehicles cannot be a subset of motorists. The most you could
claim is that they are people who may also at times be assumed to be
motorists.


-dan
From: mileburner on

"The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:xEDRm.11220$Ym4.4167(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> mileburner wrote:
>> The Medway Handyman wrote:
>>
>> Despite your weasel words, motorists have to pay VED
>>> (known to everyone as Road Tax) in order to use the roads. What
>>> specifically do cyclists have to pay in order to use the roads?
>>
>> Nothing! Because we do not pollute and damage the roads.
>
> But you do use them and clog them up, so you should pay more.

I have yet to see roads clogged up by bikes.

> But at last you have stopped lying & admitted you are a freeloading
> sponging cyclist.

Freeloading and sponging because we use what are entitled to use?

Are pedestrians freeloading sponging too?


From: Adrian on
"mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying:

> I am a cyclist and I pay VED.

Not as a cyclist, you don't.

> Is that so hard for a non-cycling motorist to understand?

Do you buy bike bits as a motorist, too?
From: Adrian on
dan(a)telent.net gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:

> keepers of vehicles cannot be a subset of motorists.

Of course they can. Or have you never heard of somebody driving a car of
which they are not the registered keeper? Hire car, company car, works
van?
From: mileburner on

"The Medway Handyman" <davidlang(a)nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:eIDRm.11222$Ym4.9939(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...

> David Lang & Steve Firth have too much common sense to ride a bike.

And therefore unlikely to understand much about riding a bike either.