From: FrengaX on
On Jul 21, 3:02 pm, Jethro <krazyka...(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> Having just watched a number cars grinding up a hill near me (I was
> walking) because a cyclist was at the head of the queue, and it was
> too twisty and narrow to safely overtake, I started wondering about
> the OVERALL effect cyclists have on carbon emissions.

Why restrict your pointless venom at cyclists? What is the similar
effect of:
- buses which crawl along/block the road with long queues of cars
behind
- milk floats (if such things exist any more)
- temporary traffic lights left in place where there is no hazard on
the road (apart from the lights themselves)
- People who have accidents on the motorway and cause massive
tailbacks
- Gypsies who decide to descend on Appleby in their horse-drawn
caravans, causing miles and miles of tailbacks on the A65
- etc

>
> Does all the extra carbon produced by cars having to crawl behind
> cyclists cancel out, or exceed the carbon saved by the cyclist ?

From: GT on
"mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:i28le3$tdn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "GT" <ContactGT_rem_ove_(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4c4774db$0$12279$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>> "Bernard" <bernard.x.ramsden(a)x.btinternet.x.com> wrote in message
>> news:VMidnWDLFL8W79rRnZ2dnUVZ8hCdnZ2d(a)bt.com...
>>>
>>> "Jethro" <krazykara0(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6842a0c5-6d67-4d78-a6b5-7ce0b485caa7(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>>>> Having just watched a number cars grinding up a hill near me (I was
>>>> walking) because a cyclist was at the head of the queue, and it was
>>>> too twisty and narrow to safely overtake, I started wondering about
>>>> the OVERALL effect cyclists have on carbon emissions.
>>>>
>>>> Does all the extra carbon produced by cars having to crawl behind
>>>> cyclists cancel out, or exceed the carbon saved by the cyclist ?
>>>
>>> If a driver is being held up by slow moving traffic and the driver is
>>> concerned about their affect on the environment, they they should find
>>> a safe place to park, turn off the engine and wait for the traffic to
>>> dissipate,
>>
>> How about...
>> If a driver is holding up traffic by moving more slowly than everyone
>> else is capable, he should find a safe place to stop and let the faster
>> moving traffic dissipate.
>
> Either way, if they were *that* concerned, they would probably not be
> driving...

Driving / riding - are you going to argue about a verb now?? Petty!

However this 'being concerned and stopping' is precisely the point -
cyclists don't care what problems they directly cause. They don't give a
damn about what is going on behind them. They are not concerned about the
pollution, queues and frustration that they directly cause, they are only
concerned with number 1 and things that impact their day directly. This is
evident daily on our roads and frequently in this driving group and it
annoys me.

I have obviously touched a nerve with you, but I wish to point out I am not
anti-cycling and I am not anti-cyclist. I frequently enjoy a leisurely cycle
at the weekends with my family, when the weather permits. My bugbear is that
I hate the 'I'm better than you' attitude that cyclists force on the other
users of our public roads, both verbally and physically.


From: GT on
"FrengaX" <hnkjqrh02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:434a3a89-0aa4-4601-9161-b43804fb9a64(a)i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 21, 3:02 pm, Jethro <krazyka...(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> Having just watched a number cars grinding up a hill near me (I was
> walking) because a cyclist was at the head of the queue, and it was
> too twisty and narrow to safely overtake, I started wondering about
> the OVERALL effect cyclists have on carbon emissions.

Why restrict your pointless venom at cyclists? What is the similar
effect of:
- buses which crawl along/block the road with long queues of cars
behind
- milk floats (if such things exist any more)
- temporary traffic lights left in place where there is no hazard on
the road (apart from the lights themselves)
- People who have accidents on the motorway and cause massive
tailbacks
- Gypsies who decide to descend on Appleby in their horse-drawn
caravans, causing miles and miles of tailbacks on the A65
- etc

I would stick my neck out and say that most of the drivers in this group
agree with you, but the original question concerned a particular example of
cyclist deliberately causing congestion, delay and frustration for many
other people. Had he moved over or stopped for a short time (as the highway
code suggests that road users should do when causing queues), then the
problem would have been alleviated, but alas this rarely happens.


From: GT on
"GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote in message
news:4c48098c$0$8908$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
> "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:i28le3$tdn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "GT" <ContactGT_rem_ove_(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4c4774db$0$12279$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>>> "Bernard" <bernard.x.ramsden(a)x.btinternet.x.com> wrote in message
>>> news:VMidnWDLFL8W79rRnZ2dnUVZ8hCdnZ2d(a)bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Jethro" <krazykara0(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:6842a0c5-6d67-4d78-a6b5-7ce0b485caa7(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> Having just watched a number cars grinding up a hill near me (I was
>>>>> walking) because a cyclist was at the head of the queue, and it was
>>>>> too twisty and narrow to safely overtake, I started wondering about
>>>>> the OVERALL effect cyclists have on carbon emissions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does all the extra carbon produced by cars having to crawl behind
>>>>> cyclists cancel out, or exceed the carbon saved by the cyclist ?
>>>>
>>>> If a driver is being held up by slow moving traffic and the driver is
>>>> concerned about their affect on the environment, they they should find
>>>> a safe place to park, turn off the engine and wait for the traffic to
>>>> dissipate,
>>>
>>> How about...
>>> If a driver is holding up traffic by moving more slowly than everyone
>>> else is capable, he should find a safe place to stop and let the faster
>>> moving traffic dissipate.
>>
>> Either way, if they were *that* concerned, they would probably not be
>> driving...
>
> Driving / riding - are you going to argue about a verb now?? Petty!
>
> However this 'being concerned and stopping' is precisely the point -
> cyclists don't care what problems they directly cause. They don't give a
> damn about what is going on behind them. They are not concerned about the
> pollution, queues and frustration that they directly cause, they are only
> concerned with number 1 and things that impact their day directly. This is
> evident daily on our roads and frequently in this driving group and it
> annoys me.
>
> I have obviously touched a nerve with you, but I wish to point out I am
> not anti-cycling and I am not anti-cyclist. I frequently enjoy a leisurely
> cycle at the weekends with my family, when the weather permits. My bugbear
> is that I hate the 'I'm better than you' attitude that cyclists force on
> the other users of our public roads, both verbally and physically.

Last sentence - add *some* before 'cyclists force'.


From: mileburner on
GT wrote:
> "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:i28le3$tdn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "GT" <ContactGT_rem_ove_(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4c4774db$0$12279$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>>> "Bernard" <bernard.x.ramsden(a)x.btinternet.x.com> wrote in message
>>> news:VMidnWDLFL8W79rRnZ2dnUVZ8hCdnZ2d(a)bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Jethro" <krazykara0(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:6842a0c5-6d67-4d78-a6b5-7ce0b485caa7(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> Having just watched a number cars grinding up a hill near me (I
>>>>> was walking) because a cyclist was at the head of the queue, and
>>>>> it was too twisty and narrow to safely overtake, I started
>>>>> wondering about the OVERALL effect cyclists have on carbon
>>>>> emissions. Does all the extra carbon produced by cars having to crawl
>>>>> behind
>>>>> cyclists cancel out, or exceed the carbon saved by the cyclist ?
>>>>
>>>> If a driver is being held up by slow moving traffic and the driver
>>>> is concerned about their affect on the environment, they they
>>>> should find a safe place to park, turn off the engine and wait for
>>>> the traffic to dissipate,
>>>
>>> How about...
>>> If a driver is holding up traffic by moving more slowly than
>>> everyone else is capable, he should find a safe place to stop and
>>> let the faster moving traffic dissipate.
>>
>> Either way, if they were *that* concerned, they would probably not be
>> driving...
>
> Driving / riding - are you going to argue about a verb now?? Petty!
>
> However this 'being concerned and stopping' is precisely the point -
> cyclists don't care what problems they directly cause. They don't
> give a damn about what is going on behind them. They are not
> concerned about the pollution, queues and frustration that they
> directly cause, they are only concerned with number 1 and things that
> impact their day directly. This is evident daily on our roads and
> frequently in this driving group and it annoys me.

Ah, diddums.

You are Violet Elizabeth Bott AICM5�

> I have obviously touched a nerve with you, but I wish to point out I
> am not anti-cycling and I am not anti-cyclist. I frequently enjoy a
> leisurely cycle at the weekends with my family, when the weather
> permits. My bugbear is that I hate the 'I'm better than you' attitude
> that cyclists force on the other users of our public roads, both
> verbally and physically.