From: Adrian on
"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

>>> It's a speed limit not a speed target.

>> Wrong - its both as far as DSA and highway code are concerned!

> Wrong yourself, there is no requirement to travel at the speed limit
> during a driving test. Only that one should make progress according to
> road and traffic conditions.

A test that did not include free-moving traffic conditions would be a
very poor test indeed.

> That also takes into account the type of vehicle one is driving.

My brother failed his motorcycle test because his motorcycle wasn't
capable of maintaining a speed near the single carriageway legal limit.
From: The Peeler on
On 23 Jul 2010 15:16:18 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
>they were saying:
>
>>>> It's a speed limit not a speed target.
>
>>> Wrong - its both as far as DSA and highway code are concerned!
>
>> Wrong yourself, there is no requirement to travel at the speed limit
>> during a driving test. Only that one should make progress according to
>> road and traffic conditions.
>
>A test that did not include free-moving traffic conditions would be a
>very poor test indeed.
>
>> That also takes into account the type of vehicle one is driving.
>
>My brother failed his motorcycle test because his motorcycle wasn't
>capable of maintaining a speed near the single carriageway legal limit.

They let him use a motorcycle that wasn't roadworthy for the test????
From: Adrian on
The Peeler <peelingthe(a)invalid.admin> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

>>> That also takes into account the type of vehicle one is driving.

>>My brother failed his motorcycle test because his motorcycle wasn't
>>capable of maintaining a speed near the single carriageway legal limit.

> They let him use a motorcycle that wasn't roadworthy for the test????

It was roadworthy. It just wasn't capable of 60mph.

Since you can only take the test on a 125 with less than 15bhp, 60mph
isn't that far below the maximum of most of those bikes. He's 6'5", and
his bike was a 100cc. It's not difficult to see how 60 would have been
ambitious, even before any loss of power through the bike being a bit
aged.
From: The Peeler on
On 23 Jul 2010 15:42:38 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>The Peeler <peelingthe(a)invalid.admin> gurgled happily, sounding much like
>they were saying:
>
>>>> That also takes into account the type of vehicle one is driving.
>
>>>My brother failed his motorcycle test because his motorcycle wasn't
>>>capable of maintaining a speed near the single carriageway legal limit.
>
>> They let him use a motorcycle that wasn't roadworthy for the test????
>
>It was roadworthy. It just wasn't capable of 60mph.
>
>Since you can only take the test on a 125 with less than 15bhp, 60mph
>isn't that far below the maximum of most of those bikes. He's 6'5", and
>his bike was a 100cc. It's not difficult to see how 60 would have been
>ambitious, even before any loss of power through the bike being a bit
>aged.

So he should have passed.
From: GT on
"mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:i2c6v5$s8k$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote in message
> news:4c496d79$0$22716$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
>> "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> Boltar's cycling advice is not really very good. I can't imagine why...
>>
>> And your road knowledge is very very very bad. We all know why!
> Who is the "we"? are you and boltar the same person?
I was simply referring to anyone in this *driving* group who knows how to
drive properly.