Prev: M25 north of Dartford crossing, fences and SPECS
Next: cheapest laptop battery camera battery camcorder battery
From: Adrian on 23 Jul 2010 11:16 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>> It's a speed limit not a speed target. >> Wrong - its both as far as DSA and highway code are concerned! > Wrong yourself, there is no requirement to travel at the speed limit > during a driving test. Only that one should make progress according to > road and traffic conditions. A test that did not include free-moving traffic conditions would be a very poor test indeed. > That also takes into account the type of vehicle one is driving. My brother failed his motorcycle test because his motorcycle wasn't capable of maintaining a speed near the single carriageway legal limit.
From: The Peeler on 23 Jul 2010 11:29 On 23 Jul 2010 15:16:18 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: >"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like >they were saying: > >>>> It's a speed limit not a speed target. > >>> Wrong - its both as far as DSA and highway code are concerned! > >> Wrong yourself, there is no requirement to travel at the speed limit >> during a driving test. Only that one should make progress according to >> road and traffic conditions. > >A test that did not include free-moving traffic conditions would be a >very poor test indeed. > >> That also takes into account the type of vehicle one is driving. > >My brother failed his motorcycle test because his motorcycle wasn't >capable of maintaining a speed near the single carriageway legal limit. They let him use a motorcycle that wasn't roadworthy for the test????
From: Adrian on 23 Jul 2010 11:42 The Peeler <peelingthe(a)invalid.admin> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>> That also takes into account the type of vehicle one is driving. >>My brother failed his motorcycle test because his motorcycle wasn't >>capable of maintaining a speed near the single carriageway legal limit. > They let him use a motorcycle that wasn't roadworthy for the test???? It was roadworthy. It just wasn't capable of 60mph. Since you can only take the test on a 125 with less than 15bhp, 60mph isn't that far below the maximum of most of those bikes. He's 6'5", and his bike was a 100cc. It's not difficult to see how 60 would have been ambitious, even before any loss of power through the bike being a bit aged.
From: The Peeler on 23 Jul 2010 11:50 On 23 Jul 2010 15:42:38 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: >The Peeler <peelingthe(a)invalid.admin> gurgled happily, sounding much like >they were saying: > >>>> That also takes into account the type of vehicle one is driving. > >>>My brother failed his motorcycle test because his motorcycle wasn't >>>capable of maintaining a speed near the single carriageway legal limit. > >> They let him use a motorcycle that wasn't roadworthy for the test???? > >It was roadworthy. It just wasn't capable of 60mph. > >Since you can only take the test on a 125 with less than 15bhp, 60mph >isn't that far below the maximum of most of those bikes. He's 6'5", and >his bike was a 100cc. It's not difficult to see how 60 would have been >ambitious, even before any loss of power through the bike being a bit >aged. So he should have passed.
From: GT on 23 Jul 2010 11:50
"mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message news:i2c6v5$s8k$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote in message > news:4c496d79$0$22716$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... >> "mileburner" <mileburner(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> >>> Boltar's cycling advice is not really very good. I can't imagine why... >> >> And your road knowledge is very very very bad. We all know why! > Who is the "we"? are you and boltar the same person? I was simply referring to anyone in this *driving* group who knows how to drive properly. |