Cyclists carbon footprint
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: M25 north of Dartford crossing, fences and SPECS
Next: cheapest laptop battery camera battery camcorder battery
From: boltar2003 on 26 Jul 2010 06:16 On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:47:24 +0100 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote: ><boltar2003(a)boltar.world> wrote in message >news:i2jj26$7pm$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... >> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:43:40 +0100 >> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> We're not talking about stopping on a dual carraigeway. >>> >>>Quite, if we were I'd have written "70mph". >> >> The limit on most of them is 60. Stick to your bicycle old man. > >Really, are you seriously saying that the NSL on a dual carriageway is >60mph? If theres no central reservation yes. Feel free to argue the point. >>>Yet again you demonstrate that you are an incompetent driver. >> >> LOL , ah the irony :) > >What irony? Ask your teddy bear. B2003
From: Adrian on 26 Jul 2010 06:19 boltar2003(a)boltar.world gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>>> We're not talking about stopping on a dual carraigeway. >>>>Quite, if we were I'd have written "70mph". >>> The limit on most of them is 60. Stick to your bicycle old man. >>Really, are you seriously saying that the NSL on a dual carriageway is >>60mph? > If theres no central reservation yes. Feel free to argue the point. You either don't know what a dual carriageway is or are just plain wrong. No "argue the point" needed.
From: boltar2003 on 26 Jul 2010 06:25 On 26 Jul 2010 10:19:34 GMT Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> If theres no central reservation yes. Feel free to argue the point. > >You either don't know what a dual carriageway is or are just plain wrong. >No "argue the point" needed. Don't even start with some BS about a 4 lane road being a single carraigeway simply because its a continuous strip of tarmac. If you think its all the same carraigeway then next time you're on one drive on the right and see what happens. B2003
From: Adrian on 26 Jul 2010 06:33 boltar2003(a)boltar.world gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>> If theres no central reservation yes. Feel free to argue the point. >>You either don't know what a dual carriageway is or are just plain >>wrong. No "argue the point" needed. > Don't even start with some BS about a 4 lane road being a single > carraigeway simply because its a continuous strip of tarmac. Count the carriageways. There's a clue in the name. It's not particularly subtle. > If you think its all the same carraigeway then next time you're on one > drive on the right and see what happens. Exactly the same as if you tried it on a two-lane single carriageway.
From: boltar2003 on 26 Jul 2010 06:47
On 26 Jul 2010 10:33:11 GMT Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: >boltar2003(a)boltar.world gurgled happily, sounding much like they were >saying: > >>>> If theres no central reservation yes. Feel free to argue the point. > >>>You either don't know what a dual carriageway is or are just plain >>>wrong. No "argue the point" needed. > >> Don't even start with some BS about a 4 lane road being a single >> carraigeway simply because its a continuous strip of tarmac. > >Count the carriageways. There's a clue in the name. It's not particularly >subtle. You're right, its not. Theres one for one direction and one for the other. Whether theres a bit of grass or 2 white lines down the middle makes not a jot of difference. B2003 |