From: Ret. on
Adrian wrote:
> bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
> were saying:
>
>>> I thought caravans were for people wanting a holiday on the cheap.
>
>> Some folk prefer the freedom etc. Each to their own.
>
> "Freedom"?
>
> Apart from the inability to use many back roads, there's a lot less
> caravan sites than there are B&Bs in touristy areas.

My wife hates using B&Bs - she just feels very uncomfortable lodging in a
stranger's home.

--
Kev

From: Adrian on
"Man at B&Q" <manatbandq(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

>> >> I thought caravans were for people wanting a holiday on the cheap.

>> > A common fallacy and misunderstanding.

>> Ok, fair enough.  I'd rather rent a cottage or stay in a hotel or guest
>> house.

> And you think that would work out cheaper than a 'van when comparing the
> same number of nights away?
>
> One weeks rent of a cottage could easily exceed one years depreciation.
> Factor in multiple trips per year and the 'van very soon starts to look
> a lot cheaper.

With all the other costs included? The capital tie-up, maintenance,
storage, extra fuel, site pitch etc etc? Now remember that Kev's planning
on changing the R75 to a smaller, cheaper-to-run car, since he doesn't
need such a large one any more - so include the extra running costs of
the larger car for the rest of the annual mileage.

I suspect it comes in a chunk closer than you think, unless you use the
caravan a LOT.

Especially don't underestimate the cost of the pitch - a quick google
finds that a "touring pitch" caravan site close to Stratford upon Avon
(random location - I'm heading near there in a few weeks) costs £80 for a
bank holiday weekend (three nights), or £46 for a normal summer weekend
(two nights).

Checking the first result for B&B in Stratford, you could be staying in a
rather lovely looking thatched cottage for £75/night for a double room.
So that's a difference of ~£100 for a two night stay. And somebody else
makes you a big fry-up for that...
From: Man at B&Q on
On Jun 22, 2:26 pm, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> "Man at B&Q" <manatba...(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
>
> >> >> I thought caravans were for people wanting a holiday on the cheap.
> >> > A common fallacy and misunderstanding.
> >> Ok, fair enough.  I'd rather rent a cottage or stay in a hotel or guest
> >> house.
> > And you think that would work out cheaper than a 'van when comparing the
> > same number of nights away?
>
> > One weeks rent of a cottage could easily exceed one years depreciation.
> > Factor in multiple trips per year and the 'van very soon starts to look
> > a lot cheaper.
>
> With all the other costs included? The capital tie-up, maintenance,
> storage, extra fuel, site pitch etc etc? Now remember that Kev's planning
> on changing the R75 to a smaller, cheaper-to-run car, since he doesn't
> need such a large one any more - so include the extra running costs of
> the larger car for the rest of the annual mileage.
>
> I suspect it comes in a chunk closer than you think, unless you use the
> caravan a LOT.

Kinda silly to have a caravan and not make use of it.

>
> Especially don't underestimate the cost of the pitch - a quick google
> finds that a "touring pitch" caravan site close to Stratford upon Avon
> (random location - I'm heading near there in a few weeks) costs £80 for a
> bank holiday weekend (three nights), or £46 for a normal summer weekend
> (two nights).

Wee-ell...

Even during Regatta week it's only £20/night for two adults inc. hook-
up, at Swiss Farm in Henley. You can stay for a lot less than that as
well at various sites all over the country.

I can guarantee my usage pattern (if I had a caravan) would make
caravanning a lot cheaper than B&B or renting.

MBQ

From: Ret. on
Adrian wrote:
> "Man at B&Q" <manatbandq(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much
> like they were saying:
>
>>>>> I thought caravans were for people wanting a holiday on the cheap.
>
>>>> A common fallacy and misunderstanding.
>
>>> Ok, fair enough. I'd rather rent a cottage or stay in a hotel or
>>> guest house.
>
>> And you think that would work out cheaper than a 'van when comparing
>> the same number of nights away?
>>
>> One weeks rent of a cottage could easily exceed one years
>> depreciation. Factor in multiple trips per year and the 'van very
>> soon starts to look a lot cheaper.
>
> With all the other costs included? The capital tie-up, maintenance,
> storage, extra fuel, site pitch etc etc? Now remember that Kev's
> planning on changing the R75 to a smaller, cheaper-to-run car, since
> he doesn't need such a large one any more - so include the extra
> running costs of the larger car for the rest of the annual mileage.
>
> I suspect it comes in a chunk closer than you think, unless you use
> the caravan a LOT.
>
> Especially don't underestimate the cost of the pitch - a quick google
> finds that a "touring pitch" caravan site close to Stratford upon Avon
> (random location - I'm heading near there in a few weeks) costs £80
> for a bank holiday weekend (three nights), or £46 for a normal summer
> weekend (two nights).
>
> Checking the first result for B&B in Stratford, you could be staying
> in a rather lovely looking thatched cottage for £75/night for a
> double room. So that's a difference of ~£100 for a two night stay.
> And somebody else makes you a big fry-up for that...

We last used the 'van in April for an eight night stay on a CL near to
Church Stretton. The cost was £100 exactly (£12.50 per night). That fee
included electric hook up.

We recently considered a four night stay in a Premier Inn in Nottingham just
for a short break. The cost (even with staff discount because we have a
relative who works for Premier Inn) woul have been £220. That £220 included
continental breakfast - but no other meals.

So more than double the price for half the length of time...

For many people, caravanning is not just 'accommodation' - it is a hobby and
an interest and they enjoy the whole experience.

--
Kev


From: Ret. on
Man at B&Q wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2:26 pm, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Man at B&Q" <manatba...(a)hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much
>> like they were saying:
>>
>>>>>> I thought caravans were for people wanting a holiday on the
>>>>>> cheap.
>>>>> A common fallacy and misunderstanding.
>>>> Ok, fair enough. I'd rather rent a cottage or stay in a hotel or
>>>> guest house.
>>> And you think that would work out cheaper than a 'van when
>>> comparing the same number of nights away?
>>
>>> One weeks rent of a cottage could easily exceed one years
>>> depreciation. Factor in multiple trips per year and the 'van very
>>> soon starts to look a lot cheaper.
>>
>> With all the other costs included? The capital tie-up, maintenance,
>> storage, extra fuel, site pitch etc etc? Now remember that Kev's
>> planning on changing the R75 to a smaller, cheaper-to-run car, since
>> he doesn't need such a large one any more - so include the extra
>> running costs of the larger car for the rest of the annual mileage.
>>
>> I suspect it comes in a chunk closer than you think, unless you use
>> the caravan a LOT.
>
> Kinda silly to have a caravan and not make use of it.
>

Which is one of the main reasons we have decided to give it up. We are
child-minders for our grand-daughter two days a week and that has seriously
affected our ability to just shoot off.

>>
>> Especially don't underestimate the cost of the pitch - a quick google
>> finds that a "touring pitch" caravan site close to Stratford upon
>> Avon (random location - I'm heading near there in a few weeks) costs
>> �80 for a bank holiday weekend (three nights), or �46 for a normal
>> summer weekend (two nights).
>
> Wee-ell...
>
> Even during Regatta week it's only �20/night for two adults inc. hook-
> up, at Swiss Farm in Henley. You can stay for a lot less than that as
> well at various sites all over the country.
>
> I can guarantee my usage pattern (if I had a caravan) would make
> caravanning a lot cheaper than B&B or renting.

I agree. Site fees vary a lot and CLs (even those with full facilities) can
be a lot cheaper than main sites.

--
Kev