From: Graz on 25 Dec 2008 11:04 On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:55:21 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >In article <4952fd6a.586819000(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says... >> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:57:52 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <4951FB0F.9C3ABCDD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore says... >> > >> >> > It is a defective vehicle. Regardless of the MOT status, it does not >> >> > meet the minimum legal requirements for roadworthiness. >> >> >> >> Define. >> >> >> >A MOT test is a test of the vehicles ability to meet the minimum >> >standard for roadworthiness. It failed. >> > >> >There are additional requirements not in the MOT which are covered by >> >C&U regs. >> >> Is a car with one failed number plate light driving in daytime >> "unroadworthy"? >> >Do you honestly need that answering? Yes. For the record. It failed the MOT therefore it is unroadworthy: yes or no?
From: Toommy on 25 Dec 2008 13:25 "M Peters" <mark.peters(a)nospam.com> wrote in message news:gisvk9$hpg$1(a)news.albasani.net... > > "Corporal Jones" <corporaljones(a)thentlworld.com> wrote in message > news:Xr94l.28508$Zz2.13047(a)newsfe30.ams2... >> >> > current MOT does not run out till the 4th of Jan > > You have answered your own question. not really If the car has onlyn 3 wheels for example > >
From: Conor on 25 Dec 2008 13:55 In article <4953aeaf.632202968(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says... > On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:55:21 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: > > >In article <4952fd6a.586819000(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says... > >> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:57:52 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >In article <4951FB0F.9C3ABCDD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore says... > >> > > >> >> > It is a defective vehicle. Regardless of the MOT status, it does not > >> >> > meet the minimum legal requirements for roadworthiness. > >> >> > >> >> Define. > >> >> > >> >A MOT test is a test of the vehicles ability to meet the minimum > >> >standard for roadworthiness. It failed. > >> > > >> >There are additional requirements not in the MOT which are covered by > >> >C&U regs. > >> > >> Is a car with one failed number plate light driving in daytime > >> "unroadworthy"? > >> > >Do you honestly need that answering? > > Yes. For the record. It failed the MOT therefore it is > unroadworthy: yes or no? > For what his has, definitely. If it's got a blown numberplate bulb, again yes, but not for a safety reason. -- Conor I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
From: Graz on 25 Dec 2008 22:05
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:55:38 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >In article <4953aeaf.632202968(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says... >> On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:55:21 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <4952fd6a.586819000(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says... >> >> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:57:52 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >In article <4951FB0F.9C3ABCDD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore says... >> >> > >> >> >> > It is a defective vehicle. Regardless of the MOT status, it does not >> >> >> > meet the minimum legal requirements for roadworthiness. >> >> >> >> >> >> Define. >> >> >> >> >> >A MOT test is a test of the vehicles ability to meet the minimum >> >> >standard for roadworthiness. It failed. >> >> > >> >> >There are additional requirements not in the MOT which are covered by >> >> >C&U regs. >> >> >> >> Is a car with one failed number plate light driving in daytime >> >> "unroadworthy"? >> >> >> >Do you honestly need that answering? >> >> Yes. For the record. It failed the MOT therefore it is >> unroadworthy: yes or no? >> >For what his has, definitely. If it's got a blown numberplate bulb, >again yes, but not for a safety reason. How is a car with one blown number plate bulb "unroadworthy" during daylight hours? What's the worst that can happen? |