From: Graz on
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:55:21 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <4952fd6a.586819000(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says...
>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:57:52 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <4951FB0F.9C3ABCDD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore says...
>> >
>> >> > It is a defective vehicle. Regardless of the MOT status, it does not
>> >> > meet the minimum legal requirements for roadworthiness.
>> >>
>> >> Define.
>> >>
>> >A MOT test is a test of the vehicles ability to meet the minimum
>> >standard for roadworthiness. It failed.
>> >
>> >There are additional requirements not in the MOT which are covered by
>> >C&U regs.
>>
>> Is a car with one failed number plate light driving in daytime
>> "unroadworthy"?
>>
>Do you honestly need that answering?

Yes. For the record. It failed the MOT therefore it is
unroadworthy: yes or no?

From: Toommy on

"M Peters" <mark.peters(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:gisvk9$hpg$1(a)news.albasani.net...
>
> "Corporal Jones" <corporaljones(a)thentlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:Xr94l.28508$Zz2.13047(a)newsfe30.ams2...
>>
>> > current MOT does not run out till the 4th of Jan
>
> You have answered your own question.

not really If the car has onlyn 3 wheels for example
>
>


From: Conor on
In article <4953aeaf.632202968(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says...
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:55:21 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <4952fd6a.586819000(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says...
> >> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:57:52 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <4951FB0F.9C3ABCDD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore says...
> >> >
> >> >> > It is a defective vehicle. Regardless of the MOT status, it does not
> >> >> > meet the minimum legal requirements for roadworthiness.
> >> >>
> >> >> Define.
> >> >>
> >> >A MOT test is a test of the vehicles ability to meet the minimum
> >> >standard for roadworthiness. It failed.
> >> >
> >> >There are additional requirements not in the MOT which are covered by
> >> >C&U regs.
> >>
> >> Is a car with one failed number plate light driving in daytime
> >> "unroadworthy"?
> >>
> >Do you honestly need that answering?
>
> Yes. For the record. It failed the MOT therefore it is
> unroadworthy: yes or no?
>
For what his has, definitely. If it's got a blown numberplate bulb,
again yes, but not for a safety reason.


--
Conor

I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
looking good either. - Scott Adams
From: Graz on
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:55:38 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <4953aeaf.632202968(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says...
>> On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:55:21 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <4952fd6a.586819000(a)news.motzarella.org>, Graz says...
>> >> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:57:52 -0000, Conor <conor_turton(a)hotmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >In article <4951FB0F.9C3ABCDD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore says...
>> >> >
>> >> >> > It is a defective vehicle. Regardless of the MOT status, it does not
>> >> >> > meet the minimum legal requirements for roadworthiness.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Define.
>> >> >>
>> >> >A MOT test is a test of the vehicles ability to meet the minimum
>> >> >standard for roadworthiness. It failed.
>> >> >
>> >> >There are additional requirements not in the MOT which are covered by
>> >> >C&U regs.
>> >>
>> >> Is a car with one failed number plate light driving in daytime
>> >> "unroadworthy"?
>> >>
>> >Do you honestly need that answering?
>>
>> Yes. For the record. It failed the MOT therefore it is
>> unroadworthy: yes or no?
>>
>For what his has, definitely. If it's got a blown numberplate bulb,
>again yes, but not for a safety reason.

How is a car with one blown number plate bulb "unroadworthy" during
daylight hours? What's the worst that can happen?