From: Criminal Drivers Murder 40,000 Americans a Year on 20 May 2010 23:46 On May 20, 8:50 pm, hal wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2010 11:00:14 -0700 (PDT), "Criminal Drivers Murder > 40,000 Americans a Year" <xeton2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >Drugged drivers are killers and maimers and deserve prison time but > >that's too expensive for the taxpayers. Better to hit them with loss > >of license and huge fines. Criminal drivers are a bigger threat to > >each of us than all other criminals put together!! > > There has never, ever been an automobile accident attributable to > cannabis when alcohol was not a contributing factor. In other words, > cannabis doesn't cause driving impairment at all. Alcohol does. Well hell - lets just start making stuff up around here.
From: hal on 21 May 2010 00:03 On Thu, 20 May 2010 20:46:28 -0700 (PDT), "Criminal Drivers Murder 40,000 Americans a Year" <xeton2001(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On May 20, 8:50=A0pm, hal wrote: >> On Thu, 20 May 2010 11:00:14 -0700 (PDT), "Criminal Drivers Murder >> 40,000 Americans a Year" <xeton2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >Drugged drivers are killers and maimers and deserve prison time but >> >that's too expensive for the taxpayers. =A0 Better to hit them with loss >> >of license and huge fines. Criminal drivers are a bigger threat to >> >each of us than all other criminals put together!! >> >> There has never, ever been an automobile accident attributable to >> cannabis when alcohol was not a contributing factor. =A0In other words, >> cannabis doesn't cause driving impairment at all. =A0Alcohol does. > >Well hell - lets just start making stuff up around here. It's true. You try to find one single example of a car accident attributed conclusively to cannabis when alcohol was also not a factor. Just one. You can't because it never happened.
From: Criminal Drivers Murder 40,000 Americans a Year on 21 May 2010 11:36 On May 20, 10:03 pm, hal wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2010 20:46:28 -0700 (PDT), "Criminal Drivers Murder > 40,000 Americans a Year" <xeton2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >On May 20, 8:50=A0pm, hal wrote: > >> On Thu, 20 May 2010 11:00:14 -0700 (PDT), "Criminal Drivers Murder > >> 40,000 Americans a Year" <xeton2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> >Drugged drivers are killers and maimers and deserve prison time but > >> >that's too expensive for the taxpayers. =A0 Better to hit them with loss > >> >of license and huge fines. Criminal drivers are a bigger threat to > >> >each of us than all other criminals put together!! > > >> There has never, ever been an automobile accident attributable to > >> cannabis when alcohol was not a contributing factor. =A0In other words, > >> cannabis doesn't cause driving impairment at all. =A0Alcohol does. > > >Well hell - lets just start making stuff up around here. > > It's true. You try to find one single example of a car accident > attributed conclusively to cannabis when alcohol was also not a > factor. Just one. You can't because it never happened. Do you enjoy being the board laughingstock?
From: jane on 21 May 2010 11:49 On May 20, 9:58 pm, "Criminal Drivers Murder 40,000 Americans a Year" <xeton2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 20, 1:40 pm, John David Galt <j...(a)diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> > wrote: > > > > > Any law that takes away a driver's license for reasons other than bad driving > > only provokes, and justifies, driving without a license. > > YOu libertarian loons are all alike. You think you should be allowed > to drive as crazy as you want until you actually kill someone Do you have a reading comprehension problem? I read John's post and no where did John state that people should be allowed to drive "as crazy as you want". John's statement was merely expressing opposition to a law that allowed a government to arrest a person who as driving NORMALLY and NOT under the influence of any drugs. Do you think a person should be arrested for driving a week after having a a few beers? Jane
From: lorad on 21 May 2010 12:00 On May 20, 2:00 pm, "Criminal Drivers Murder 40,000 Americans a Year" <xeton2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > http://www.prisonplanet.com/feds-move-to-throw-pot-smokers-in-prison-... > > Feds Move to Throw Pot Smokers in Prison for Impaired Driving > > Infowars.com May 20 2010 > > If you smoked marijuana last week or even last month and you drive a > car, you may be sent to prison under new guidelines drafted by the > federal government. > > The Obama administration released its National Drug Control Strategy > guidelines last week. The federal government wants all of the states > to adopt its authoritarian and draconian diktat and expand the drug > war. From the guidelines: > > Cannabis metabolites can remain detectable in the urine for up to 100 > days or longer for a regular cannabis consumer and up to fifteen days > for the casual consumer, according to NORML, the marijuana advocacy > organization. In other words, even if a pot smoker is conscientious > and does not drive while intoxicated, that person can be arrested and > convicted for DUID days or weeks after consuming marijuana. > (snip) > > Drugged drivers are killers and maimers and deserve prison time but > that's too expensive for the taxpayers. Better to hit them with loss > of license and huge fines. Criminal drivers are a bigger threat to > each of us than all other criminals put together!! You need to re-examine your thinking. If there is no impaired driving evident why would you put people in prison? It does indeed look as though the neocon administrations are attempting to criminalize everyone. You too.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Operation Distance Chart: 16.55% Next: Will Obama lead to Perestroika? |