From: Harry K on
On Jan 20, 5:25 am, gpsman <gps...(a)driversmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 19, 12:10 pm, "Dave C." <no...(a)nohow.never> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:30:39 -0800 (PST)
> > Harry K <turnkey4...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I learned a long time ago that in limited visibility conditions,
> > > > it's safest to run without lights on.  It attracts too much
> > > > attention from LEOs.  Better to run stealth.
>
> > > That is about the dumbest statement I have read.
>
> > Roughly 15 years ago, I would have thought so, too.  But I was getting
> > hassled for speeding when the only difference between me and nearby
> > traffic was, I had my lights on in low visibility conditions.  It
> > happened too often to be coincidence.  When you are in the middle of a
> > pack of 5-10 cars and you are the one that gets pulled over (time and
> > again), you start to wonder what it is about your car that is drawing
> > attention.
>
> > Anyway, I learned my lesson.   In rain/fog, the lights are off.  No
> > more hassles.  -Dave
>
> Stupid + stupid = more stupid, not less, stupid.
>  -----
>
> - gpsman- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Amen to that. I am still shaking my head at that statement.

Harry K
From: Harry K on
On Jan 19, 9:11 am, "Dave C." <no...(a)nohow.never> wrote:
> > Sounds like she had the speed right.  In heavy fog everyone should
> > keep it under 20.
>
> Please PLEASE tell me you practice what you preach.  But then again, if
> you did, you would have exited stage right decades ago...-Dave

But would have saved the cost of a coffin, the ball of metal would
serve nicely.

Harry K