From: Harry K on 20 Jan 2010 10:53 On Jan 20, 5:25 am, gpsman <gps...(a)driversmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 19, 12:10 pm, "Dave C." <no...(a)nohow.never> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:30:39 -0800 (PST) > > Harry K <turnkey4...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I learned a long time ago that in limited visibility conditions, > > > > it's safest to run without lights on. It attracts too much > > > > attention from LEOs. Better to run stealth. > > > > That is about the dumbest statement I have read. > > > Roughly 15 years ago, I would have thought so, too. But I was getting > > hassled for speeding when the only difference between me and nearby > > traffic was, I had my lights on in low visibility conditions. It > > happened too often to be coincidence. When you are in the middle of a > > pack of 5-10 cars and you are the one that gets pulled over (time and > > again), you start to wonder what it is about your car that is drawing > > attention. > > > Anyway, I learned my lesson. In rain/fog, the lights are off. No > > more hassles. -Dave > > Stupid + stupid = more stupid, not less, stupid. > ----- > > - gpsman- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Amen to that. I am still shaking my head at that statement. Harry K
From: Harry K on 20 Jan 2010 10:54 On Jan 19, 9:11 am, "Dave C." <no...(a)nohow.never> wrote: > > Sounds like she had the speed right. In heavy fog everyone should > > keep it under 20. > > Please PLEASE tell me you practice what you preach. But then again, if > you did, you would have exited stage right decades ago...-Dave But would have saved the cost of a coffin, the ball of metal would serve nicely. Harry K
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Late night live TV car commerical??? Next: Operation Emboss: 91.17% |