From: Brimstone on


"broadssailor" <graham.trimmer(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3d4caec3-9040-4110-9e86-0442dc9abf5c(a)a15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On 8 Jan, 20:22, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>>
>> news:6974d091-374f-4cde-a7ba-a79f16706070(a)c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 8 Jan, 17:44, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:1495d415-ea7d-4c2d-a268-7f8cebb0382a(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > On 8 Jan, 16:05, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Alang <inva...(a)invalid.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like
>> >> >> they
>> >> >> were saying:
>>
>> >> >> >>Absolutely, and I would be happy for pay an extra penny (say) of
>> >> >> >>income
>> >> >> >>tax if that would stop "our troops" getting killed.
>> >> >> > If they don't want to risk getting killed they shouldn't join the
>> >> >> > army
>>
>> >> >> There are times when I think I'm the only person holding that
>> >> >> opinion...
>>
>> >> >> Having people try to kill you is a fairly inherent part of the job
>> >> >> description. Don't like it? Walk _past_ the Army recruitment
>> >> >> office,
>> >> >> then.
>>
>> >> > My sentiments entirely!
>>
>> >> We could always revert to conscription.
>>
>> > Then they would 'deserve' sympathy.
>>
>> Who is asking for sympathy?
>
> OK then, they would deserve our our 'support and protection.'

Do you understand the function of the armed forces?


From: Bod on
Brimstone wrote:
>
>
> "broadssailor" <graham.trimmer(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3d4caec3-9040-4110-9e86-0442dc9abf5c(a)a15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> On 8 Jan, 20:22, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:6974d091-374f-4cde-a7ba-a79f16706070(a)c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 8 Jan, 17:44, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>
>>> >>news:1495d415-ea7d-4c2d-a268-7f8cebb0382a(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> >> > On 8 Jan, 16:05, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> Alang <inva...(a)invalid.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much
>>> like >> >> they
>>> >> >> were saying:
>>>
>>> >> >> >>Absolutely, and I would be happy for pay an extra penny (say) of
>>> >> >> >>income
>>> >> >> >>tax if that would stop "our troops" getting killed.
>>> >> >> > If they don't want to risk getting killed they shouldn't join
>>> the
>>> >> >> > army
>>>
>>> >> >> There are times when I think I'm the only person holding that
>>> >> >> opinion...
>>>
>>> >> >> Having people try to kill you is a fairly inherent part of the job
>>> >> >> description. Don't like it? Walk _past_ the Army recruitment >>
>>> >> office,
>>> >> >> then.
>>>
>>> >> > My sentiments entirely!
>>>
>>> >> We could always revert to conscription.
>>>
>>> > Then they would 'deserve' sympathy.
>>>
>>> Who is asking for sympathy?
>>
>> OK then, they would deserve our our 'support and protection.'
>
> Do you understand the function of the armed forces?
>
>
The protection of our oil interests in the middle east? :-)

Bod
From: Brimstone on


"Bod" <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:7qr21eFsmfU2(a)mid.individual.net...
> Brimstone wrote:
>>
>>
>> "broadssailor" <graham.trimmer(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:3d4caec3-9040-4110-9e86-0442dc9abf5c(a)a15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>>> On 8 Jan, 20:22, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:6974d091-374f-4cde-a7ba-a79f16706070(a)c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On 8 Jan, 17:44, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> >>news:1495d415-ea7d-4c2d-a268-7f8cebb0382a(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >> > On 8 Jan, 16:05, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> Alang <inva...(a)invalid.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much
>>>> like >> >> they
>>>> >> >> were saying:
>>>>
>>>> >> >> >>Absolutely, and I would be happy for pay an extra penny (say)
>>>> >> >> >>of
>>>> >> >> >>income
>>>> >> >> >>tax if that would stop "our troops" getting killed.
>>>> >> >> > If they don't want to risk getting killed they shouldn't join
>>>> the
>>>> >> >> > army
>>>>
>>>> >> >> There are times when I think I'm the only person holding that
>>>> >> >> opinion...
>>>>
>>>> >> >> Having people try to kill you is a fairly inherent part of the
>>>> >> >> job
>>>> >> >> description. Don't like it? Walk _past_ the Army recruitment >>
>>>> >> office,
>>>> >> >> then.
>>>>
>>>> >> > My sentiments entirely!
>>>>
>>>> >> We could always revert to conscription.
>>>>
>>>> > Then they would 'deserve' sympathy.
>>>>
>>>> Who is asking for sympathy?
>>>
>>> OK then, they would deserve our our 'support and protection.'
>>
>> Do you understand the function of the armed forces?
>>
>>
> The protection of our oil interests in the middle east? :-)
>
That's what the politicians use them for, sadly. >:-(