From: Brimstone on 9 Jan 2010 04:49 "broadssailor" <graham.trimmer(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message news:3d4caec3-9040-4110-9e86-0442dc9abf5c(a)a15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On 8 Jan, 20:22, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message >> >> news:6974d091-374f-4cde-a7ba-a79f16706070(a)c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > On 8 Jan, 17:44, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message >> >> >>news:1495d415-ea7d-4c2d-a268-7f8cebb0382a(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> > On 8 Jan, 16:05, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Alang <inva...(a)invalid.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like >> >> >> they >> >> >> were saying: >> >> >> >> >>Absolutely, and I would be happy for pay an extra penny (say) of >> >> >> >>income >> >> >> >>tax if that would stop "our troops" getting killed. >> >> >> > If they don't want to risk getting killed they shouldn't join the >> >> >> > army >> >> >> >> There are times when I think I'm the only person holding that >> >> >> opinion... >> >> >> >> Having people try to kill you is a fairly inherent part of the job >> >> >> description. Don't like it? Walk _past_ the Army recruitment >> >> >> office, >> >> >> then. >> >> >> > My sentiments entirely! >> >> >> We could always revert to conscription. >> >> > Then they would 'deserve' sympathy. >> >> Who is asking for sympathy? > > OK then, they would deserve our our 'support and protection.' Do you understand the function of the armed forces?
From: Bod on 9 Jan 2010 04:53 Brimstone wrote: > > > "broadssailor" <graham.trimmer(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message > news:3d4caec3-9040-4110-9e86-0442dc9abf5c(a)a15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> On 8 Jan, 20:22, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message >>> >>> news:6974d091-374f-4cde-a7ba-a79f16706070(a)c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> >>> >>> > On 8 Jan, 17:44, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message >>> >>> >>news:1495d415-ea7d-4c2d-a268-7f8cebb0382a(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> >>> >> > On 8 Jan, 16:05, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> Alang <inva...(a)invalid.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much >>> like >> >> they >>> >> >> were saying: >>> >>> >> >> >>Absolutely, and I would be happy for pay an extra penny (say) of >>> >> >> >>income >>> >> >> >>tax if that would stop "our troops" getting killed. >>> >> >> > If they don't want to risk getting killed they shouldn't join >>> the >>> >> >> > army >>> >>> >> >> There are times when I think I'm the only person holding that >>> >> >> opinion... >>> >>> >> >> Having people try to kill you is a fairly inherent part of the job >>> >> >> description. Don't like it? Walk _past_ the Army recruitment >> >>> >> office, >>> >> >> then. >>> >>> >> > My sentiments entirely! >>> >>> >> We could always revert to conscription. >>> >>> > Then they would 'deserve' sympathy. >>> >>> Who is asking for sympathy? >> >> OK then, they would deserve our our 'support and protection.' > > Do you understand the function of the armed forces? > > The protection of our oil interests in the middle east? :-) Bod
From: Brimstone on 9 Jan 2010 05:43
"Bod" <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message news:7qr21eFsmfU2(a)mid.individual.net... > Brimstone wrote: >> >> >> "broadssailor" <graham.trimmer(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:3d4caec3-9040-4110-9e86-0442dc9abf5c(a)a15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>> On 8 Jan, 20:22, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message >>>> >>>> news:6974d091-374f-4cde-a7ba-a79f16706070(a)c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > On 8 Jan, 17:44, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> "broadssailor" <graham.trim...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message >>>> >>>> >>news:1495d415-ea7d-4c2d-a268-7f8cebb0382a(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> >> > On 8 Jan, 16:05, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> >> Alang <inva...(a)invalid.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much >>>> like >> >> they >>>> >> >> were saying: >>>> >>>> >> >> >>Absolutely, and I would be happy for pay an extra penny (say) >>>> >> >> >>of >>>> >> >> >>income >>>> >> >> >>tax if that would stop "our troops" getting killed. >>>> >> >> > If they don't want to risk getting killed they shouldn't join >>>> the >>>> >> >> > army >>>> >>>> >> >> There are times when I think I'm the only person holding that >>>> >> >> opinion... >>>> >>>> >> >> Having people try to kill you is a fairly inherent part of the >>>> >> >> job >>>> >> >> description. Don't like it? Walk _past_ the Army recruitment >> >>>> >> office, >>>> >> >> then. >>>> >>>> >> > My sentiments entirely! >>>> >>>> >> We could always revert to conscription. >>>> >>>> > Then they would 'deserve' sympathy. >>>> >>>> Who is asking for sympathy? >>> >>> OK then, they would deserve our our 'support and protection.' >> >> Do you understand the function of the armed forces? >> >> > The protection of our oil interests in the middle east? :-) > That's what the politicians use them for, sadly. >:-( |