From: Scott Dorsey on
Roger Blake <rogblake(a)iname.invalid> wrote:
>On 2010-04-04, KG <kgsAT(a)msbx.net> wrote:
>> It hasn't any thing to do whit the president.
>
>It will if the Anointed One signs the threatened cap-and-loot bill which
>the Dimrats want to push through. That will raise energy taxes through
>the roof, all with His blessing.

I really don't understand this. Cap and trade was a Republican concept
that Bush was promoting... but now come the new administration and all
the folks on the right of the aisle are against it. Can't you just make
up your mind?
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
From: Roger Blake on
On 2010-04-04, Scott Dorsey <kludge(a)panix.com> wrote:
> I really don't understand this. Cap and trade was a Republican concept
> that Bush was promoting... but now come the new administration and all
> the folks on the right of the aisle are against it. Can't you just make
> up your mind?

One might just as well ask why the DimRATs are supporting it since it
was supported by the eeeevil, satanic George Bush. After all -- Bush's
policies were idiotic, failed, crackpot ideas, right?

I'm against cap-and-license-to-steal no matter whether it comes
from the Repugnicans or the DimRATs. Both parties are out to screw
us. They both stink to high heaven.

--
Roger Blake
(Change "invalid" to "com" for email. Google Groups killfiled due to spam.)
"Obama dozed while people froze."
From: aemeijers on
Roger Blake wrote:
> On 2010-04-04, Scott Dorsey <kludge(a)panix.com> wrote:
>> I really don't understand this. Cap and trade was a Republican concept
>> that Bush was promoting... but now come the new administration and all
>> the folks on the right of the aisle are against it. Can't you just make
>> up your mind?
>
> One might just as well ask why the DimRATs are supporting it since it
> was supported by the eeeevil, satanic George Bush. After all -- Bush's
> policies were idiotic, failed, crackpot ideas, right?
>
> I'm against cap-and-license-to-steal no matter whether it comes
> from the Repugnicans or the DimRATs. Both parties are out to screw
> us. They both stink to high heaven.
>

Now you're catching on. A pox on both their houses. Time for None of the
Above!

--
aem sends...
From: jim on


Roger Blake wrote:
>
> On 2010-04-04, KG <kgsAT(a)msbx.net> wrote:
> > It hasn't any thing to do whit the president.
>
> It will if the Anointed One signs the threatened cap-and-loot bill which
> the Dimrats want to push through. That will raise energy taxes through
> the roof, all with His blessing.

So what is wrong with that? That would makes more sense than borrowing
more money from China. Problem is it is all in your head. That is
definitely what this president and the previous 4 presidents should have
been pushing for - but he won't. Like the others this one is just
another Bum who can't pay his bills.

-jim
From: Roger Blake on
On 2010-04-05, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m> wrote:
> So what is wrong with that?

What is wrong with crushing, punishing taxes in the middle of
a recession? (Or any time for that matter.) Are you serious?

> more money from China. Problem is it is all in your head. That is

You are looking at the problem backwards. What we need to be doing
is reducing spending. You could confiscate all of the privately-held
wealth in the country and still not be able to pay for what the
DimRATS want to do. The path we are currently on is completely
unsustainable.

> been pushing for - but he won't. Like the others this one is just
> another Bum who can't pay his bills.

No argument there.

--
Roger Blake
(Change "invalid" to "com" for email. Google Groups killfiled due to spam.)
"Obama dozed while people froze."
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Prev: visit to succeed
Next: Toyota's electronic throttle, and..