From: jim on


Roger Blake wrote:
>
> On 2010-04-05, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m> wrote:
> > So what is wrong with that?
>
> What is wrong with crushing, punishing taxes in the middle of
> a recession? (Or any time for that matter.) Are you serious?


Yes i'm serious. Either we get used to high energy costs now or pay for
it later in a continuing series of energy cost spikes followed by
recessions.



>
> > more money from China. Problem is it is all in your head. That is
>
> You are looking at the problem backwards. What we need to be doing
> is reducing spending. You could confiscate all of the privately-held
> wealth in the country and still not be able to pay for what the
> DimRATS want to do. The path we are currently on is completely
> unsustainable.

Well that is completely false and not very much on point. But I never
suggested confiscating anybody's wealth. I'm suggesting we pay our
bills. Babbling about reducing spending and not paying the bills is what
got us into this mess. We can't all continue to pretend we are Ronald
Reagon forever - talk about reducing spending while spend spend spend
more than anybody else ever has. Nothing is going to change as long as
we are doing nothing but talk about reducing spending and then not
paying the bills. If we start actually taxing as much as we spend and
pay the piper there might be some hope for change.


>
> > been pushing for - but he won't. Like the others this one is just
> > another Bum who can't pay his bills.
>
> No argument there.
>

Yeah except you will be happy when the next bum who doesn't pay the
bills comes along as long as that one spouts whatever BS you prefer.
From: Roger Blake on
> Yeah except you will be happy when the next bum who doesn't pay the
> bills comes along as long as that one spouts whatever BS you prefer.

A rather presumptuous assumption. You are of course wrong.

--
Roger Blake
(Change "invalid" to "com" for email. Google Groups killfiled due to spam.)
"Obama dozed while people froze."