From: jim on 5 Apr 2010 13:07 Roger Blake wrote: > > On 2010-04-05, jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m> wrote: > > So what is wrong with that? > > What is wrong with crushing, punishing taxes in the middle of > a recession? (Or any time for that matter.) Are you serious? Yes i'm serious. Either we get used to high energy costs now or pay for it later in a continuing series of energy cost spikes followed by recessions. > > > more money from China. Problem is it is all in your head. That is > > You are looking at the problem backwards. What we need to be doing > is reducing spending. You could confiscate all of the privately-held > wealth in the country and still not be able to pay for what the > DimRATS want to do. The path we are currently on is completely > unsustainable. Well that is completely false and not very much on point. But I never suggested confiscating anybody's wealth. I'm suggesting we pay our bills. Babbling about reducing spending and not paying the bills is what got us into this mess. We can't all continue to pretend we are Ronald Reagon forever - talk about reducing spending while spend spend spend more than anybody else ever has. Nothing is going to change as long as we are doing nothing but talk about reducing spending and then not paying the bills. If we start actually taxing as much as we spend and pay the piper there might be some hope for change. > > > been pushing for - but he won't. Like the others this one is just > > another Bum who can't pay his bills. > > No argument there. > Yeah except you will be happy when the next bum who doesn't pay the bills comes along as long as that one spouts whatever BS you prefer.
From: Roger Blake on 5 Apr 2010 16:18
> Yeah except you will be happy when the next bum who doesn't pay the > bills comes along as long as that one spouts whatever BS you prefer. A rather presumptuous assumption. You are of course wrong. -- Roger Blake (Change "invalid" to "com" for email. Google Groups killfiled due to spam.) "Obama dozed while people froze." |