Gas price up a $1 a gallon
in [Technical]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 26 Mar 2010 20:24 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:15:11 -0500, hls wrote: > The price of gasoline is not the worst thing that could result from > Obama's presidency. > > I didnt like his politics before he was elected,and like them even less > now. > > I hope that after November a lot of Democrats have to walk home from > Washington D.C. I think Nancy will board the last Military flight back to San Fran...
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 26 Mar 2010 20:27 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:54:15 -0500, AZ Nomad wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:06:40 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <chuck(a)nil.car> wrote: >>=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote >>in news:hoh98r$87h$2(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:07:46 -1000, dsi1 wrote: >>> >>>>> Merely stating a fact. Obama's BC could be etched in stone, for all I >>>>> care. I'm not debating the BC, just the sealing of records. >>>> >>>> This is a good thing - believing in the BC fairy tale is not good. >>>> Only a Mr. Bungle would do that. Personally, I'd rather be informed >>>> first before anybody released any of my personal records for printing >>>> in the media. I bet you would too - come on... fess up. :-) >>> >>> Damn right! But, I'm not the leader of the Free world!! We all saw >>> Bush's Nat Guard record, didn't we? Not that it was worth anything, or >>> that he was any better. >>> >>Booted out for substance abuse is my bet. > > Nah. He just didn't show up. He knew daddy would take care of it. But the record was there for all to see.
From: Roger Blake on 27 Mar 2010 08:08 On 2010-03-26, chuckcar <chuck(a)nil.car> wrote: > We'll see when you're 80 and getting free treatment for cancer. Show us the section of the Constitution that authorizes the federal government to provide "free treatment for cancer." Where do you think the funds for this "free treatment" are going to come from after your buddy Barack and his henchmen in Congress have finished the job of completely bankrupting this country? -- Roger Blake (Change "invalid" to "com" for email. Google Groups killfiled due to spam.) "Obama dozed while people froze."
From: Scott Dorsey on 27 Mar 2010 10:10 Roger Blake <rogblake(a)iname.invalid> wrote: >On 2010-03-26, chuckcar <chuck(a)nil.car> wrote: >> We'll see when you're 80 and getting free treatment for cancer. > >Show us the section of the Constitution that authorizes the federal >government to provide "free treatment for cancer." Whoops! It's unconstitutional to provide free treatment for cancer! I guess we need to shut down Medicare, then. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
From: Roger Blake on 27 Mar 2010 10:47
On 2010-03-27, Scott Dorsey <kludge(a)panix.com> wrote: > Whoops! It's unconstitutional to provide free treatment for cancer! > I guess we need to shut down Medicare, then. You are evading the question. The Constitution is a grant of limited powers to the federal government. (See Amenment 10.) This being the case, where in that document do you find the authority to provide for "free treatment for cancer?" Have you even read it? Ever? You are also evading the question of how you expect to pay for this "free" treatment, particularly when other countries can no longer be suckered into buying trillions of dollars of our debt. To answer your question: If you have any respect for freedom, liberty, limited constitutional government, and the rule of law, then yes, Medicare needs to be shut down. It should never have been permitted in the first place in the abscence of a Constitutional amendment. As judge Janice Rogers Brown has observed, there is simply no way to fit the New Deal or the Great Society into the framework of the Constitution. Obamacare falls into the same category. Your buddy Barack has crumpled up what was left of the Constitution and left it laying by the side of the road for dead. -- Roger Blake (Change "invalid" to "com" for email. Google Groups killfiled due to spam.) "Obama dozed while people froze." |