Prev: Trucks and right lanes (Vic)
Next: 88 Tarago
From: OzOne on 28 Jul 2010 08:43 On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:56:04 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: > ><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message >news:snlv46te5pdocf9f35sfen942jc26dqchi(a)4ax.com... > >> Dearest ignorant one....If you are not aware of the reasons why a >> large car is more comfortable and probably as economical as a small >> one on a long trip, Then neither I nor anyone else would be able to >> convince you of it. > >So, you mean "I made a ridiculous statement, and I'm not prepared to >embarrass myself with any more bullshit"? > >> Still, I'll give you a few points to ponder >> Chassis dynamics >> Noise >> Engine RPM. > >Uh-huh. So, what is intrinsically "large car" about any of those? > >Your detailed explanation should be a corker :) Noticed yet that no-one is backing you on this one Nod? OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Noddy on 28 Jul 2010 08:53 <OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message news:8f9056hgs055vl86jq5mu5jshs8af3lldb(a)4ax.com... > Noticed yet that no-one is backing you on this one Nod? Notice that this is your *second* reply to the same post? That usually happens when you can't defend your bullshit claims and you've got your panties in a knot about it :) -- Regards, Noddy.
From: John_H on 28 Jul 2010 18:26 Toby wrote: > >Fun: >Dial up 130 and attack, say, Miriamvale to Gin Gin. >Good test of nerve, that one:-) How anyone could set their cruise control at 130 in a 100 zone and survive is completely beyond me (it'd be like one of those runaway cars we hear about)! OTOH I have no doubt that setting it at a 100 in a 100 zone is perfectly safe under any conditions (so long as it doesn't creep so much as 1k over). :) -- John H
From: OzOne on 28 Jul 2010 18:47 On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:53:35 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: > ><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message >news:8f9056hgs055vl86jq5mu5jshs8af3lldb(a)4ax.com... > >> Noticed yet that no-one is backing you on this one Nod? > >Notice that this is your *second* reply to the same post? Yeah I like to post to you in small bites, so you can understand! Noticed yet that no-one is backing you on this one? OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 28 Jul 2010 22:08
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:57:41 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: > ><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message >news:qrc156psvb3583olqtce7dsvaf0bk4kd6k(a)4ax.com... > >> Yeah sure... >> Did you think about vehicle dynamics and how this affects comfort? >> Have you had a think about how much less noise you get in a larger >> car? >> Have you thought about a loping large engine compared to a hard >> working smaller one? >> >> Nah didn't think so.....You could never be convinced that a larger car >> is better for distance travel.....especially as I've said it is eh! > >What I "think* about this is irrelevant Ozliar. Of course you do. It's either because you are uneducated, ignorant of facts, or need to not agree with anything I say. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. |