Gillard's $2k offer
in [Aussie Drivers]
|
Prev: Trucks and right lanes (Vic)
Next: 88 Tarago
From: OzOne on 28 Jul 2010 23:43 On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:28:04 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: > ><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message >news:4io156pr4lrnds28huu7s5i09bberv2sa0(a)4ax.com... > >> It's either because you are uneducated, ignorant of facts, or need to >> not agree with anything I say. > >I've told you before Ozliar. I only echo the bullshit *you* freely elect to >put up, and I do that just to make sure that no one missed it. Mmmmm, so now you've managed to walk away from your idiotic statement that a large car is no better on a trip than a small one. Good work, your reputation remains as it has always been OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 28 Jul 2010 23:49 On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:27:03 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: > ><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message >news:hdo156h473qlbn04v4vdrf669fp1mdsio3(a)4ax.com... > >> Notice that you have no answer to my post where I suggested reasons >> that you obviously don't understand. >> >> How typically ignorant of you. > >You suggested reasons? Yes indeed...however you seemed to not be capable of comprehension. I'll repeat myself,,and add a few more. Try chassis dynamics...longer suspension travel means better compliance, longer wheelbase and track mean better ride. Larger vehicle means better sound insulation added to the mechanicals being further from and better insulated from the cabin. Larger wheel sizes mean better ride Larger engine does the work easier. The list is rather large...however I'd suggest you feel free to continue long trips on country roads in a small car.....It might rattle a little sense into you. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Noddy on 29 Jul 2010 00:16 <OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message news:17u156pkpr0drf1s347s7194vbmtjdpj4i(a)4ax.com... > Yes indeed...however you seemed to not be capable of comprehension. Translation: "Noddy doesn't understand my particular version of goobledegook" > I'll repeat myself,,and add a few more. Feel free, but *please* be specific. > Try chassis dynamics...longer suspension travel means better > compliance, longer wheelbase and track mean better ride. > Larger vehicle means better sound insulation added to the mechanicals > being further from and better insulated from the cabin. > Larger wheel sizes mean better ride > Larger engine does the work easier. Ooh, nice. > The list is rather large...however I'd suggest you feel free to > continue long trips on country roads in a small car.....It might > rattle a little sense into you. As I mentioned previously, a number of times now, and as you've conveniently ignored me every time I have, perhaps you can explain *exactly* how *any* of that is particular to a larger car or that it cannot be applied equally as effectively to a smaller one? You see Ozliar, your overly simplistic generalisations make it sound like you saying that a poverty pack Falcon wagon is a more comfortable car and a better highway cruiser than a Lexus IS250 or a 3 Series BMW when even *you* aren't *that* dumb to think that's the case. As I said in another post, the *size* of the car is irrelevant. How well it's finished and balanced certainly is. -- Regards, Noddy.
From: OzOne on 29 Jul 2010 01:02 On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:21:09 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: >Given the choice between a bog stock base model Falcon and a Honda Accord >Euro there is absolutely *no* doubt in my mind whatsoever which would be the >vastly superior highway cruiser despite there being a very significant size >difference between the two. Jeeez, given the choice between anything and a Lightburn Zeta.... Damn...you really are QUITE stupid. Let me tell you what makes the Accord so very close to Falcon ride. It's be the FACT that the wheelbase is only 80mm less, and the track a mere 3mm less. Lets now go to external, overall size. The Accord is a massive 25mm shorter than the Falcon and a humungous 23mm narrower. Seems that you are as ignorant of vehicle size as you are of their dynamics. Get the shovel out Nod...you'll either be digging a hole for your bullshit, or digging up more goalposts. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Albm&ctd on 29 Jul 2010 01:02
In article <4c4cf6fc$0$12395$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net>, Mission.Control(a)NASA.com says... > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor(a)rageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:8b3tvvFn0tU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > Let's see the Pollys place themselves into Diesels or Prius' BEFORE I am > > forced to trade up(?) to a new car. > > > > [Shakes head] > > As I understand it, Gillard's version of the "cash for clunkers" scheme is > an incentive, not compulsory, so I don't think anyone will be forcing you to > do anything. > Wonder if she would give me $2K for the Pintara so I could buy a $10 matchbox car and pocket (or buy Vodka with) the rest. Al -- I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html |