From: Ivor Jones on


"David Taylor" <davidt-news(a)yadt.co.uk> wrote in message
news:slrneeghl9.1l0t.davidt-news(a)outcold.yadt.co.uk
> On 2006-08-20, Ivor Jones <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote:
> > "Alex Heney" <me8(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
> > news:jrdfe25dif8pan465o93nc18qb5jbdr30s(a)4ax.com
> > >
> > > He just wrongly believes that somebody who is English
> > > is not also European.
> >
> > Not wrongly.
>
> It's simple logic. Just like all cats are mammals:
>
> All people born in the country of England were also born
> on the continent of Europe.
>
> The meaning of the word "European" in the English
> language includes
> the meaning "Born in Europe".

To you maybe, not to me and it is *my* definition that applies to me, not
yours.

> Thus, anyone who describes you as "European" is correct.
> You may dislike them for describing you like that, but
> you can't say they're wrong.

Yes I can, because they are.

> If you wish, sue me for libel and you can see if a court
> thinks you can be accurately described as European.

I don't care what you or any court may think, I am not a European and
that's an end of it.

If you don't like it, stop calling me it and I will stop complaining.

> Note also that I'm not trying to "define" you, merely
> describe you.

I have not asked for your description. I know perfectly well who and what
I am, and European isn't it.

Ivor


From: Ivor Jones on

"mattic" <this(a)wontwork.com> wrote in message
news:VmWFg.14944$rP1.1997(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au

[rest of long post snipped]

> But, as far as where you live, Ivor, that's
> Europe, mate,

(a) no it isn't, it's England

(b) you're not my mate. No mate of mine would insult me over and over and
over again despite my asking them not to.

Ivor


From: Ivor Jones on


"David Taylor" <davidt-news(a)yadt.co.uk> wrote in message
news:slrneeghc7.1l0t.davidt-news(a)outcold.yadt.co.uk
> On 2006-08-20, Ivor Jones <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote:
> > "Alex Heney" <me8(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
> > news:hkdfe2hpjfsbksocc5bonvq55u7vfklv0m(a)4ax.com
> > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:23:51 +0100, "Brimstone"
> > > <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > He is a *lot* more stubborn (and shows rather less
> > > intelligence) on this matter than Ben Nevis.
> >
> > Stubborness doesn't even begin to come into it.
>
> Ah, it's merely the lack of intelligence.

If that's what you want to think.

Ivor


From: Ivor Jones on


"Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message
news:k6hge2hkgos23sm5olbml8d87geuskhn2d(a)4ax.com
> On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:07:12 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
> > "Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message
> > news:ro9fe2lft5h14ol1jqc4ddhf06c1o5ie4r(a)4ax.com
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Could it be that you are "defined" even better by the
> > > phrase "illiterate fuckwit"?
> >
> > Ah, the foul language argument again.
> >
> > Do you still not get it..? As soon as you start
> > swearing to make your point, you immediately become
> > completely and totally wrong, even if you weren't to
> > start with.
> >
> > You were, but it's irrelevant now, you have just made
> > me right.
> >
>
> Bollocks.

Proof if ever I saw it.

You're wrong.

Ivor


From: Ivor Jones on


"David Taylor" <davidt-news(a)yadt.co.uk> wrote in message
news:slrneegh93.1l0t.davidt-news(a)outcold.yadt.co.uk
> On 2006-08-20, Ivor Jones <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote:
> > "Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message
> > news:ro9fe2lft5h14ol1jqc4ddhf06c1o5ie4r(a)4ax.com
> >
> > > Could it be that you are "defined" even better by the
> > > phrase "illiterate fuckwit"?
> >
> > Ah, the foul language argument again.
> >
> > Do you still not get it..? As soon as you start
> > swearing to make your point, you immediately become
> > completely and totally wrong, even if you weren't to
> > start with.
> >
> > You were, but it's irrelevant now, you have just made
> > me right.
>
> You are not a European, you illiterate fuckwit.

First part correct, second part not so.

> Damn, now I've "immediately become completely and totally
> wrong". So what does that leave you as?

That argument doesn't work. Even a liar can tell the truth sometimes.

Ivor