Prev: Speeding - a few questions
Next: Smartcom 12s relay?
From: Ivor Jones on 20 Aug 2006 11:41 "David Taylor" <davidt-news(a)yadt.co.uk> wrote in message news:slrneeghl9.1l0t.davidt-news(a)outcold.yadt.co.uk > On 2006-08-20, Ivor Jones <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote: > > "Alex Heney" <me8(a)privacy.net> wrote in message > > news:jrdfe25dif8pan465o93nc18qb5jbdr30s(a)4ax.com > > > > > > He just wrongly believes that somebody who is English > > > is not also European. > > > > Not wrongly. > > It's simple logic. Just like all cats are mammals: > > All people born in the country of England were also born > on the continent of Europe. > > The meaning of the word "European" in the English > language includes > the meaning "Born in Europe". To you maybe, not to me and it is *my* definition that applies to me, not yours. > Thus, anyone who describes you as "European" is correct. > You may dislike them for describing you like that, but > you can't say they're wrong. Yes I can, because they are. > If you wish, sue me for libel and you can see if a court > thinks you can be accurately described as European. I don't care what you or any court may think, I am not a European and that's an end of it. If you don't like it, stop calling me it and I will stop complaining. > Note also that I'm not trying to "define" you, merely > describe you. I have not asked for your description. I know perfectly well who and what I am, and European isn't it. Ivor
From: Ivor Jones on 20 Aug 2006 11:43 "mattic" <this(a)wontwork.com> wrote in message news:VmWFg.14944$rP1.1997(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au [rest of long post snipped] > But, as far as where you live, Ivor, that's > Europe, mate, (a) no it isn't, it's England (b) you're not my mate. No mate of mine would insult me over and over and over again despite my asking them not to. Ivor
From: Ivor Jones on 20 Aug 2006 11:44 "David Taylor" <davidt-news(a)yadt.co.uk> wrote in message news:slrneeghc7.1l0t.davidt-news(a)outcold.yadt.co.uk > On 2006-08-20, Ivor Jones <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote: > > "Alex Heney" <me8(a)privacy.net> wrote in message > > news:hkdfe2hpjfsbksocc5bonvq55u7vfklv0m(a)4ax.com > > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:23:51 +0100, "Brimstone" > > > <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > He is a *lot* more stubborn (and shows rather less > > > intelligence) on this matter than Ben Nevis. > > > > Stubborness doesn't even begin to come into it. > > Ah, it's merely the lack of intelligence. If that's what you want to think. Ivor
From: Ivor Jones on 20 Aug 2006 11:44 "Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message news:k6hge2hkgos23sm5olbml8d87geuskhn2d(a)4ax.com > On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:07:12 +0100, "Ivor Jones" > <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote: > > > "Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message > > news:ro9fe2lft5h14ol1jqc4ddhf06c1o5ie4r(a)4ax.com > > > > [snip] > > > > > Could it be that you are "defined" even better by the > > > phrase "illiterate fuckwit"? > > > > Ah, the foul language argument again. > > > > Do you still not get it..? As soon as you start > > swearing to make your point, you immediately become > > completely and totally wrong, even if you weren't to > > start with. > > > > You were, but it's irrelevant now, you have just made > > me right. > > > > Bollocks. Proof if ever I saw it. You're wrong. Ivor
From: Ivor Jones on 20 Aug 2006 11:45
"David Taylor" <davidt-news(a)yadt.co.uk> wrote in message news:slrneegh93.1l0t.davidt-news(a)outcold.yadt.co.uk > On 2006-08-20, Ivor Jones <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote: > > "Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message > > news:ro9fe2lft5h14ol1jqc4ddhf06c1o5ie4r(a)4ax.com > > > > > Could it be that you are "defined" even better by the > > > phrase "illiterate fuckwit"? > > > > Ah, the foul language argument again. > > > > Do you still not get it..? As soon as you start > > swearing to make your point, you immediately become > > completely and totally wrong, even if you weren't to > > start with. > > > > You were, but it's irrelevant now, you have just made > > me right. > > You are not a European, you illiterate fuckwit. First part correct, second part not so. > Damn, now I've "immediately become completely and totally > wrong". So what does that leave you as? That argument doesn't work. Even a liar can tell the truth sometimes. Ivor |