From: Brimstone on

"Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9824CC8CF6B6Eadrianachapmanfreeis(a)204.153.244.170...
> PC Paul (urd(a)munge.org.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
> saying :
>
>> Look, poor Ivor has said he gives up lots of times, why not just let him!
>
> I'm not *forcing* him to reply... are you?

Just as no one is forcing him to read chicken language.


From: Ivor Jones on
"Tony Raven" <junk(a)raven-family.com> wrote in message
news:4kp56sFd3p9vU1(a)individual.net
> Ivor Jones wrote on 19/08/2006 18:44 +0100:
> >
> > I'm still not a European either.
> >
>
> OED: European n.
>
> B. 1. A native of Europe.
>
> Ergo you are a European and saying otherwise will not
> change the fact.

I'm not a native of Europe, there is no such country. I can only be a
native of a country, not a continent.

> You still haven't said whether you recognise the terms
> American, Asian, African or Australian.

That's not relevant.

Ivor


From: Brimstone on

"Ivor Jones" <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote in message
news:4kp6lrFda5s5U1(a)individual.net...
> "Tony Raven" <junk(a)raven-family.com> wrote in message
> news:4kp56sFd3p9vU1(a)individual.net
>> Ivor Jones wrote on 19/08/2006 18:44 +0100:
>> >
>> > I'm still not a European either.
>> >
>>
>> OED: European n.
>>
>> B. 1. A native of Europe.
>>
>> Ergo you are a European and saying otherwise will not
>> change the fact.
>
> I'm not a native of Europe, there is no such country. I can only be a
> native of a country, not a continent.

So you know better than the Oxford English Dictionary?

>> You still haven't said whether you recognise the terms
>> American, Asian, African or Australian.
>
> That's not relevant.

So that's a "yes" then is it?


From: Chris Slade on
Ivor Jones wrote:

> I'm not a native of Europe, there is no such country. I can only be a
> native of a country, not a continent.

There's your problem. You simply don't understand simple English. You can be
a native of much more than just a country.

See e.g. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/native

>> You still haven't said whether you recognise the terms
>> American, Asian, African or Australian.
>
> That's not relevant.

It might show if you were consistently wrong. I can understand why you might
not want to admit that though.
--
Chris


From: Adrian on
Ivor Jones (ivor(a)despammed.invalid) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying :

>> You still haven't said whether you recognise the terms
>> American, Asian, African or Australian.

> That's not relevant.

It certainly is - because by your logic, there's no such thing as an Asian
or African, because there's no country called Asia or Africa.