From: Brimstone on
Alex Heney wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:23:18 +0100, "Brimstone"
> <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> David Taylor wrote:
>>> On 2006-08-19, Brimstone <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If we all email them today, maybe they'll put it in the next
>>>>> edition!
>>>>
>>>> Since it's an inaccurate usage why bother?
>>>
>>> There is so much wrong with that sentence, I don't entirely know
>>> where to start.
>>>
>>> The English language is described BY it's usage. The dictionaries
>>> are merely there to document that usage. That English changes over
>>> time is rather obvious -- look at Shakespeare's plays.
>>
>> Quite true but, as I've said elsewhere, the word in question has
>> been in widespread use for several decades and the OED hasn't seen
>> fit to include it whereas they have with other more recent words and
>> uses.
>>
>
> So they have missed it.
>
> I am quite sure that if somebody presented them with evidence that it
> was a recognised meaning of the word, they would include it.

Here's your chance to have an influence on the future of our great
language:-

http://www.oed.com/general/contacts.html and scroll down to "OED appeals and
submissions"


From: Brimstone on
Alex Heney wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:16:32 +0100, "Brimstone"
> <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Paul {Hamilton Rooney} wrote:
>>> On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:08:44 +0100, "Brimstone"
>>> <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alex Heney" <me8(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:5lhce2dfu34qn4ppn7o1frf94sgfl0t2fv(a)4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:50:58 +0100, Tony Raven
>>>>> <junk(a)raven-family.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex Heney wrote on 18/08/2006 21:40 +0100:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:58:04 GMT, JAF
>>>>>>> <anarchSPAMKILLER(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:07:41 +0100, Paul {Hamilton Rooney}
>>>>>>>> <craig(a)oil.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It meant a fixed thing or place.
>>>>>>>> Post (stick in the ground) and post (mail) have different
>>>>>>>> origins.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And "undertake" (to take upon oneself), "undertake" (to carry
>>>>>>> out funerals) and "undertake" (to pass on the "wrong" side) all
>>>>>>> have different origins.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But only the first two are recognised by the OED.
>>>>>
>>>>> True.
>>>>>
>>>>> But give it time :-)
>>>>
>>>> How long?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd guess two or three years.
>>
>> Hmmm, I've been hearing it used in the sense of passing another
>> vehicle on the nearside for as many decades, how come the OED
>> haven't included it yet?
>>
>
> The OED require print evidence of it having been used with that
> meaning.
>
> Didn't you watch "Balderdash and Piffle" on BBC2 recently?

I don't watch TV.


From: Brimstone on
Ivor Jones wrote:
> "SteveH" <steve(a)italiancar.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1hkcdcb.18n3s7qexz5ldN%steve(a)italiancar.co.uk
>> Ivor Jones <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>>> My passport has nothing to do with it.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately for you, it does.
>>>>
>>>> You live in a country, and have a passport from, a
>>>> country that is part of the European Economic
>>>> Community. This makes you a European.
>>>>
>>>> What is it that's so hard to understand about this
>>>> concept?
>>>
>>> Everything, because it isn't true.
>>
>> OK. Right.... <takes deep breath>
>>
>> Could you *please* explain to everyone how someone with a
>> British passport, resident in the UK, which is part of
>> the EU cannot be considered a European?
>
> Because a continent is not a country. I am defined by my country of
> birth not my continent of residence. If I move to Australia, I will
> still be English.

You will also still be European. If you remain there any length of time you
will become Australian.


From: Brimstone on
Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Zo2dnazyZaXfD3rZRVnyjQ(a)bt.com
>> Ivor Jones wrote:
>>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:GaWdnRiFM52yGHrZRVny2g(a)bt.com
>>>> Ivor Jones wrote:
>>>>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:J_CdnS2fedU943rZnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d(a)bt.com
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>>> So you object to being defined as a human male?
>>>>>
>>>>> I object to others deciding what I am.
>>>>
>>>> Others decided you are a human male.
>>>
>>> Oh yes, who..? I was unaware it was possible to choose
>>> the gender of a child in the 50's.
>>
>> But it's what other people define you as.
>
> Hmm. I didn't think my mother and father looked at me and said "we've
> had a European"

No, they probably said, "We've had a baby boy". True or False?


From: Brimstone on
Alex Heney wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:52:16 +0100, "Brimstone"
> <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Ivor Jones" <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:4kp14fFd9k96U1(a)individual.net...
>>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:cK6dnTgzcauTs3rZRVnygg(a)bt.com
>>>> Ivor Jones wrote:
>>>>> "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:CeWdnSWvU9LHI3vZRVnyuQ(a)bt.com
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>>> So you're an immigrant?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, my father was..! I was born in Essex.
>>>>
>>>> You're still an immigrant in that you're not English.
>>>
>>> Now you're really talking cobblers. How can I not be English if I
>>> was born in England..?
>>
>> Because of your parentage.
>>
>
> By that argument, there is (and can be) nobody who is English.

Nor any other nationality.